I'm a impressionable semi young male who is getting really involved in the Obama movement,
it just seems so easy and they seem to gather everything on the internet --
I feel as if I get a lead on the party now,
I will have more power in the next 3 years.
(Obama for Chancellor implying that in next 5 years we have major economic gains, major military involvement, and start to re-take territorial possessions) for ***
Uh no, a Liberal who kicks ass who would of thought we'd get the younger generation rowdy!
Bam.
(This is of course just one possible scenario)
Let me continue -- if you think about it --
at the end of the fight, how much money is really spent? We get these when we find these 'facts' and figures they announce... are you assuming those numbers are being controlled too? Because 51 million might sound like a lot -- but to me it just seems a drop in the bucket...so thats a question...I'm asking
http://www.opensecre...res08/index.php51 million raised, as said by THAT source.. sounds like a drop in the bucket?
So I'm thinking something runs deeper.
It's not the people with the most money, I think democracy has to be rigged. It actually works. You just have to get the vote. If you REALLY don't have the votes, you REALLY don't win.
Anyways -- that's all assuming these 'numbers' are all just from 'donations' and not being 'rigged' (You know, IRS shit) but regardless, it shows a huge 2:1 advantage to Obama -- is it implying that Obama is going to win? "major medit outlets" all show leads for Obama, slight, but, enought to enspire a fight (of course)
So, you know -- just throwing that out there --
He's the first major-party candidate since the system was created to decline taxpayers' money for the general election.** quoted from that source. Isn't that going to sound amazing during a debate?
To the people who actually vote? Just all ideas.
Edited by JackCole, 31 July 2008 - 06:21 AM.