• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In    
  • Create Account
  LongeCity
              Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans

Photo
- - - - -

Resveratrol is genotoxic?


  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

#1 platypus

  • Guest
  • 2,386 posts
  • 240
  • Location:Italy

Posted 13 August 2008 - 10:45 AM


What's this?:

Chem Res Toxicol. 2008 Feb;21(2):282-7. Epub 2008 Jan 5.
Effect of methyl substitution on the antioxidative property and
genotoxicity of resveratrol.
Fukuhara K, Nakanishi I, Matsuoka A, Matsumura T, Honda S, Hayashi M,
Ozawa T, Miyata N, Saito S, Ikota N, Okuda H.
Division of Organic Chemistry, National Institute of Health Sciences,
Setagaya-ku, Tokyo 158-8501, Japan. fukuh...@nihs.go.jp
Resveratrol ( trans-3,4',5-trihydroxystilbene) is a natural
phytoalexin with various biological activities including inhibition of
lipid peroxidation and free radical scavenging properties. In addition
to its beneficial effects, resveratrol also has significant
genotoxicity that leads to a high frequency of chromosome aberration
together with micronucleus and sister chromatid exchanges. To enhance
the radical scavenging activities and to reduce the genotoxicity of
resveratrol, we designed 4'-methyl resveratrol analogues where a
methyl group was introduced at the ortho position relative to the 4'-
hydroxy group, which is responsible for both antioxidative activities
and genotoxicity of resveratrol. These synthesized methyl analogues of
resveratrol showed increased antioxidative activities against
galvinoxyl radical as an oxyl radical species. Furthermore, the methyl
analogues also surprisingly showed reduced in vitro genotoxicities,
suggesting that methyl substitution may improve resveratrol efficacy.


PMID: 18177016 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

#2 maxwatt

  • Guest, Moderator LeadNavigator
  • 4,949 posts
  • 1,625
  • Location:New York

Posted 13 August 2008 - 10:55 AM

Caffeine is genotoxic. LSD is genotoxic. Almost anything is genotoxic in vitro at a high enough concentration. We need to look at the methods section of the paper to find out what concentrations they were using. Odds are it's much higher than can the sermum levels that can be obtained in mammals.

Click HERE to rent this advertising spot to support LongeCity (this will replace the google ad above).

#3 Guest_chucklesmcgee_*

  • Lurker
  • 0

Posted 14 August 2008 - 01:21 AM

If it is, it's not genotoxic enough to outweigh it's lifespan extending properties seen in studies with rats and mice. Something interesting just the same. Might explain it's in-vitro abilities to destroy cancer cells.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users