noting the double slit experiment then what is the gravitational form of a particle after it has travelled
a way to map the gravity around this is to have the double slit experiment at a diffuse plasma of spin polarized hydrogen or deuterium atoms (bosons or fermions) then run numerous atoms through the double slit, while creating experimental versions with only wave detection, as well as versions with only particle detection as well as either version, as well as nondetected version Then with sufficient numbers of atoms the diffuse spin polarized hydrogen or deuterium should migrate towards the strem of resolved atoms as a resul;t of gravity (you see the hydrogen or deuterium with nmr) . there are spectrometers where people have actually moved grams of atoms through an ion beam, thus a cumulative gravity measure through a double slit is possible. do the always detected as wave versions have a different gravity map, possibly wider or banded or even nodal, than the always detected as particles if they do then equational variations on gravity are produced. Nodal gravity compared with particle point gravity would be amenable to adjustment. if measuring gravity resolves to always create a nonexclusive wave or particle detection (an eitherish thing) then there is the occurence of observationless pregravity where gravity is actually absent existence prior to a seperate detector event after a travelled path, if the gravity map forms immediately post double slit "like an angstrom away" then always creates or drives a particular detectability then the area of how gravity is thought to act on all other gravityable objects is questioned. or otherwise if measuring the gravity gives the system identity it seems as though the previously considered gravity is always actioned n active all over the planet thing is questioned if it is observationless pregravity kind of the copenhagen (actual sentient observer required) version compared with the (if it could be observed, it has observation function) version
so if the continual gravity form of what occurs after a double slit traversal can create the observed definition then its actually a three resolution system gravmap, wave, or particle triality
yet wouldnt it be more actual to note that all the fundamental forces like strong n weak nuclear force if they can be mapped just after a double slit traversal of an atom are also mappable. perhaps rather than duality or triality it is actually an ality of the number of fundamental forces any of which could be used to resolve the double slit, its just that some are more "near" measure than others. wave is like EM linked, particle is like kinetic linked, gravmap is gravity linked. if you have atoms meet a double slit with a half life of 1 millisecond, while passing the slit takes a millisecond, then half the atopms will create daughter products during the experiment, so does that create an observable novel conserved effect, which would be a strongweak nuclear force map of double slit effect. possibly this could be used to study the effects of various things on modifyiong the nterval of atomic decay, modifying that would be novel
also what do superconductors do at a double slit experiment superconductors have a transition temperature yet at a vacuum with only directional translation velocity perhaps temperature is nonmeaningful or is defined as the meeting of wave or particle with detector nteraction notably a superconductor would deflect with the meissner effect so a big magnet placed behind the detectors could eithe do nothing to a wave version, yet deflect or even halt a particle prior to detection, what is the time direction functionality of that
it might be nifty to aim superconding molecules through a double slit then see if if wave effects are a path to studying ways to raise superconducting transition temperatures as you could overlap two or more beams of waves to see how that effect, which could be nterpreted at the particle detector as different molecules or molecular overlaps effects transition temperature also you can tell if the superconductor is better with higher transition temperature if it deflects more from the big magnet from the meissner effect
