I'm not sure about the level of interest in AMPAkines. I already take a bunch of neuroprotective compounds, deprenyl, ALCAR, Bacopa so I see the risk of excitotoxicity as somewhat mitigated. IDRA-21 was not pushed forward because it was such a potent compound. It was intended for people with dementia or recovering from strokes. While compounds like NSI-189 are interesting for people with MDD, I don't see the need for it in the average citizen. NSI-189 insofar as I can tell was intended to be used on veterans recovering from extremely stressful situation, like war and helping with PTSD.
Also, I don't understand the interest in CX compounds and IDRA-21. IDRA-21 has a much longer half-life, lower dose profile and sustained nootropic effects after administration of the compound in patat monkeys. CX has not shown such properties to my knowledge. And, if people are scared of IDRA-21 because it has a benzo structure, that's just stupid. There are plenty of compounds with benzo structures that are potent nootropics, like GABAa alpha 5 inverse agonists and IDRA-21 which also acts as a moderate inverse agonist at those receptors. So, I don't see why the bad rap of benzo's should carry onto this compound (either that or people are misinformed.)
Still interested in your input on IDRA-21. So, fat a similar compound with such qualities is yet to be discovered.














