These posts are getting tired. Why make all of these threads when there could just be the one?
It's a divide and conquer.
Atheism is compared to theism and found equal in the sense that they are both "beleif systems" by which we live. This "equalization" is then used to make atheism less scientific and theism more scientific, making them equally scientific. After that all bets are off since theism is in reality completely fictional, but this logical stunt fallacy makes theism scientific. So, fiction becomes science by this strike of a logic fallacy and shadowhawk gains his ground to spew fiction as fact declaring that the universe must have a border and outside the border must be God and that all he said is science, not fiction or religion.
On the other hand, religions of Christianity and Islam are not emphasized to be equal in the sense of being "beleif systems" as that is obvious to all. So, the argument he used to "drag" atheism down to the level of religions is skipped over in the other threads as it is taken for granted. Noone should notice it. Since atheism is discussed in another thread.
But in fact, if we apply the same principle that he used to "devalue" atheism we can only conclude that all such "beleif systems" are equal in purpose, we use them to guide ourselves. This conclusion is in fact true but is not what he's after. He needs atheism devalued, Christianity uphieved to be the only truth and Islam "allowed in spite of moral transgressions" because christians are so forgiving.
So the islam thread discusses islam transgressions while the same thing is deemed discussion derailing and off topic in the christianity thread. The islam thread talks about islam discriminating other religions. In the christianity thread posts about christians burning non-christians at the stake, inventing slavery etc is declared to be off topic and discussion derailing or red herring. Posts about Islam actually allowing Christianity while at the same time Christians burned all non christians and the period laster for centuries are also deemed off topic.
So, that's why he needs separate threads. He can not possibly add up all his argumentation into a coherent system that does not contradict itself. So he divides his mind and argumentation to three distinct "battle fields" and he has a ready "magic the gathering deck" for "fighting" each one. It is in fact "discussion derailing" to stray from his magic the gathering deck. All this seems to be a result of him needing attention and validation for his existence. So much vigour into proving something that needs no proof, has no proof by design and is in fact destroyed by proof (proof renders faith into knowledge and thus removes the subjective effect that faith has on people) shows his deep cognitive dissonance.
Edited by addx, 23 May 2014 - 10:09 AM.
LongeCity
