• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In    
  • Create Account
  LongeCity
              Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans

Photo

Elite Athletes Live Longer


  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

#1 reason

  • Guardian Reason
  • 1,101 posts
  • 249
  • Location:US

Posted 20 August 2014 - 11:09 AM


It remains an open question as to why top-level athletes live notably longer than the rest of us. The point of interest is to what degree the longevity difference is produced by exercise and training versus a population bias among successful athletes to more robust individuals who would live longer regardless of their profession. That's hard to answer at this point, and is a part of broader research regarding exercise, in that while moderate regular exercise is clearly beneficial, it is unknown as to whether anything more than merely moderate regular exercise is more beneficial over the long term.

To determine whether the health benefits of exercise are actually confined (or not) to noncompetitive, moderate (or recreational) practice is of broad medical interest and might help clinicians have more evidence-based data on exercise benefits. Thus, we conducted a meta-analysis of cohort studies comparing mortality in elite athletes with mortality in the general population. We hypothesized that the overall health benefits of competitive exercise would counteract any potential detrimental effect, resulting in higher longevity and lower disease risk in elite athletes than in the general population.

Ten studies, including data from a total of 42,807 athletes (707 women), met all inclusion criteria. The all-cause pooled standard mortality ratio (SMR) was 0.67 with no evidence of publication bias but with significant heterogeneity among studies. Six studies provided data on cardiovascular disease (CVD) and 5 on cancer (in a total of 35,920 and 12,119 athletes, respectively). When only CVD was considered as a cause of mortality, the pooled SMR was 0.73 with no evidence of bias or heterogenity among studies. The SMR for cancer was 0.60 with no evidence of bias despite a significant heterogeneity.

The evidence available indicates that top-level athletes live longer than the general population and have a lower risk of 2 major causes of mortality, namely, CVD and cancer. [This] suggests that the beneficial health effects of exercise, particularly in decreasing CVD and cancer risk, are not necessarily confined to moderate doses. Future studies might elucidate whether the present high demands of professional sports participation also translate into an actual longevity and health benefit.

Link: http://www.mayoclini...0519-9/fulltext


View the full article at FightAging

#2 Kalliste

  • Guest
  • 1,147 posts
  • 159

Posted 23 August 2014 - 10:04 AM

Whats the take-away. Should I try to exercise as much as possible and see if I can qualify as an atheltic person for the rest of my life. I'm afraid I will damage my heart but my energy to kind of do this is definetly there.



Click HERE to rent this BIOSCIENCE adspot to support LongeCity (this will replace the google ad above).

#3 scottknl

  • Guest
  • 421 posts
  • 325
  • Location:Seattle

Posted 23 August 2014 - 02:08 PM

The counterpoint here:

 

How much is too much?

https://www.youtube....h?v=Y6U728AZnV0



#4 burungnasar

  • Guest
  • 32 posts
  • 10
  • Location:Gütersloh

Posted 23 August 2014 - 06:17 PM

The counterpoint here:

 

How much is too much?

https://www.youtube....h?v=Y6U728AZnV0

 

How serious am I supposed to take someone who starts with that old Pheidippides canard?



#5 drew_ab

  • Guest
  • 121 posts
  • 18
  • Location:Earth

Posted 23 August 2014 - 06:25 PM

Exactly the same video I was about to link.  Dr. O'keefe (sp?) has done much additional research since that video as well.  All of which seems to indicate exercise being on a U-shaped curve.  Too much is bad, as is too little.

The counterpoint here:

 

How much is too much?

https://www.youtube....h?v=Y6U728AZnV0

 



#6 scottknl

  • Guest
  • 421 posts
  • 325
  • Location:Seattle

Posted 23 August 2014 - 10:31 PM

 

The counterpoint here:

 

How much is too much?

https://www.youtube....h?v=Y6U728AZnV0

 

How serious am I supposed to take someone who starts with that old Pheidippides canard?

 

How about the Micah True story?

http://www.nytimes.c...wanted=all&_r=0

 

Much more recent and illustrates the same phenomena.  Excessive exercise->Enlarged heart = early death.



Click HERE to rent this BIOSCIENCE adspot to support LongeCity (this will replace the google ad above).

#7 scottknl

  • Guest
  • 421 posts
  • 325
  • Location:Seattle

Posted 23 August 2014 - 10:35 PM

Another curious fact is that no supercentenarians were elite athletes.


  • Needs references x 1
  • Good Point x 1




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users