• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In    
  • Create Account
  LongeCity
              Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans

Photo
- - - - -

Why aren't we going crazy for Tiron?

tiron

  • Please log in to reply
11 replies to this topic

#1 The Ripper

  • Guest
  • 97 posts
  • 8
  • Location:Europe

Posted 06 November 2014 - 05:15 AM


Article: http://www.scienceda...40110103526.htm

It can be bought already: http://www.fisher.co...-m-p-300-c.html

---------

 

 

c60 has only had toxicity studies done on rats and plenty of people including myself are already taking it without waiting for definitive human trials. Likewise, Tiron appears to be extremely effective. How come more on here haven't tried to calculate a safe dose based on interspecies scaling and start taking it?

 


  • Pointless, Timewasting x 1

#2 Heyman

  • Guest
  • 207 posts
  • 13
  • Location:Germany

Posted 06 November 2014 - 07:46 AM

Good question. I wonder how one would even get it into the skin as lots of substances its very hard to get them into the skin. There are also safety issues, who says reducing radicals by 100% is a good thing? Your cells try to communicate and actually do useful things with these radicals. But this also applies to c60. However I don't understand people who use c60 either, at least not if they are not threatened by death immdiately. There is no way I would use that right now instead of waiting several years into the future when it is more researched.



sponsored ad

  • Advert
Click HERE to rent this advertising spot for AGELESS LOOKS to support LongeCity (this will replace the google ad above).

#3 PWAIN

  • Guest
  • 1,288 posts
  • 241
  • Location:Melbourne

Posted 06 November 2014 - 11:32 AM

Looks interesting. C60 in oo was considered reasonably safe because testing had been done in humans with C60. It was also supposedly responsible for a considerable amount of life extension in mice. This seems to be limited to skin and is of unknown safety in humans. Antioxidants don't appear to be the answer to life extension and it is not clear whether this targets mitochondria. On the plus side, it appears to be super cheap...

#4 Logic

  • Guest
  • 2,659 posts
  • 587
  • Location:Kimberley, South Africa
  • NO

Posted 06 November 2014 - 02:00 PM

It seems that iron is freed from iron-sulphur enzymes within the cell by UVA.
The free iron reacts with ROS causing irreversible oxidative damage.
Tiron is able to chelate the iron inside the mitochondria.
http://www.longecity...w-anti-oxidant/

More local links:
http://www.longecity...about-it/page-3

#5 The Ripper

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 97 posts
  • 8
  • Location:Europe

Posted 08 November 2014 - 04:32 PM

It seems that iron is freed from iron-sulphur enzymes within the cell by UVA.
The free iron reacts with ROS causing irreversible oxidative damage.
Tiron is able to chelate the iron inside the mitochondria.
http://www.longecity...w-anti-oxidant/

More local links:
http://www.longecity...about-it/page-3

Crazy stuff!

Are there any human trials going on right now? And is there any reason we don't just scale the doses used in mice for humans and try it ourselves right now?

Finally, these results are from ingestion of Tiron, not topical application, correct?



#6 Logic

  • Guest
  • 2,659 posts
  • 587
  • Location:Kimberley, South Africa
  • NO

Posted 08 November 2014 - 08:09 PM

Crazy stuff!

Are there any human trials going on right now? And is there any reason we don't just scale the doses used in mice for humans and try it ourselves right now?

Finally, these results are from ingestion of Tiron, not topical application, correct?


:)
I asked myself the same question when I read about this stuff.
I haven't looked deeply but it looks like the studies are all in vitro atm?
Worth keeping an eye on though.

#7 SuicidalTraveler

  • Guest
  • 25 posts
  • 3
  • Location:Traveling

Posted 25 February 2016 - 10:48 AM

Yep.

People should give this more attention.

#8 Logic

  • Guest
  • 2,659 posts
  • 587
  • Location:Kimberley, South Africa
  • NO

Posted 25 February 2016 - 03:00 PM

Yep.

People should give this more attention.

 

Yep!  :)

 

http://www.longecity...idant/?p=763513



#9 DanielEdward

  • Guest
  • 21 posts
  • 3
  • Location:UK
  • NO

Posted 27 February 2016 - 11:09 PM

It seems that iron is freed from iron-sulphur enzymes within the cell by UVA.
The free iron reacts with ROS causing irreversible oxidative damage.
Tiron is able to chelate the iron inside the mitochondria.
http://www.longecity...w-anti-oxidant/

More local links:
http://www.longecity...about-it/page-3


So if we are not taking Tiron should we decrease dietary iron? I thought increased iron levels correlated with less oxidative damage/ skin damage

#10 niner

  • Guest
  • 16,276 posts
  • 2,000
  • Location:Philadelphia

Posted 28 February 2016 - 03:15 AM

So if we are not taking Tiron should we decrease dietary iron? I thought increased iron levels correlated with less oxidative damage/ skin damage

 

If anything, it's the other way around.  Higher iron means more oxidative damage.  More than one person here uses blood donation as a way of keeping their ferritin level below 100.


  • Informative x 1

#11 DanielEdward

  • Guest
  • 21 posts
  • 3
  • Location:UK
  • NO

Posted 28 February 2016 - 03:55 PM

So if we are not taking Tiron should we decrease dietary iron? I thought increased iron levels correlated with less oxidative damage/ skin damage


If anything, it's the other way around. Higher iron means more oxidative damage. More than one person here uses blood donation as a way of keeping their ferritin level below 100.

I've been increasing iron thinking I was doing good (I'm slightly anaemic looking). This makes me wonder where else I may be unknowingly going wrong with my diet plan. I'm considering stopping trying to perfect my diet and just following my gut instinct on food

#12 Logic

  • Guest
  • 2,659 posts
  • 587
  • Location:Kimberley, South Africa
  • NO

Posted 01 April 2017 - 07:28 PM

 

 

So if we are not taking Tiron should we decrease dietary iron? I thought increased iron levels correlated with less oxidative damage/ skin damage


If anything, it's the other way around. Higher iron means more oxidative damage. More than one person here uses blood donation as a way of keeping their ferritin level below 100.

I've been increasing iron thinking I was doing good (I'm slightly anaemic looking). This makes me wonder where else I may be unknowingly going wrong with my diet plan. I'm considering stopping trying to perfect my diet and just following my gut instinct on food

 

 

IIRC a shortage of one of the B vitamins, or its not being metabolised properly is responsible for anemia when iron is plentiful.
Use GoogleSiteSearch in the Search menu (top of page) to search out the info.







Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: tiron

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users