• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In    
  • Create Account
  LongeCity
              Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans

Photo
- - - - -

'Bad luck' of random mutations plays predominant role in cancer

neurogenesis cancer

  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

#1 Fenix_

  • Guest
  • 183 posts
  • 20
  • Location:Longecity
  • NO

Posted 02 January 2015 - 09:02 PM


http://www.scienceda...50101142318.htm

 

Should we be worried about the possibility of developing brain tumours when taking drugs like NSI-189, and boosting neurotrophic factors that increase rates of neurogenesis? And how do we prevent or fix these mutations, or inhibit their expression? Is C60-oo the closest thing we have for this?


Edited by Fenix_, 02 January 2015 - 09:05 PM.

  • like x 1

#2 StevesPetRat

  • Guest
  • 565 posts
  • 86
  • Location:San Jose, CA

Posted 03 January 2015 - 12:17 AM

Interesing. This fits nicely with my preferred model of aging, the stochastic hypothesis. I think mainly you just have to make sure the environment in your body isn't conducive to the spread of cancer, via things like intermittent fasting and taking occasional rounds of pro-apoptotic supplements.

sponsored ad

  • Advert
Click HERE to rent this advertising spot for BRAIN HEALTH to support LongeCity (this will replace the google ad above).

#3 Maxpower

  • Guest
  • 79 posts
  • 8
  • Location:Where work takes me.
  • NO

Posted 05 January 2015 - 11:05 AM

Is there any evidence yet of C60-oo reducing the chance (or curing early cases) of cancer in humans?







Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: neurogenesis, cancer

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users