• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In    
  • Create Account
  LongeCity
              Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans

Photo
- - - - -

C60 fullerene nanoemulsion is good for collagen regeneration against skin aging

c60 fullerene skin aging collagen

  • Please log in to reply
9 replies to this topic

#1 Anthony_Loera

  • Life Member
  • 3,168 posts
  • 745
  • Location:Miami Florida

Posted 03 May 2015 - 12:54 AM


and something for your skin...

 

Skin intervention of fullerene-integrated nanoemulsion in structural and collagen regeneration against skinaging.

 

Abstract

Despite the fact that intrinsic oxidative stress is inevitable, the extrinsic factor such as ultraviolet radiation enhances reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation resulting in premature skin aging.

 

Nanoemulsion was loaded with fullerene, a strong free radical scavenger, and its efficacy to provide protection and regenerative effect against ROS-induced collagen breakdown in human skin was studied. Stable fullerene nanoemulsions were formulated using high shear homogenization and ultrasonic dispersion technique.

 

An open trial was conducted using fullerene nanoemulsion on skin twice a day for 28 days.

 

The mean collagen score significantly increased (P<0.05) from 36.53±4.39 to 48.69±5.46 with 33.29% increment at the end of the treatment. Biophysical characteristics of skin revealed that skin hydration was increased significantly (P<0.05) from 40.91±7.01 to 58.55±6.08 corneometric units (43.12% increment) and the water was able to contain within the stratum corneum without any increased in transepidermal water loss.

 

In the in vitro safety evaluation, fullerene nanoemulsion showed no acute toxicity on 3T3 fibroblast cell line for 48h and no indication of potential dermal irritation. Hence, the fullerene nanoemulsion may assist in protecting collagen from breakdown with cosmeceutical benefit.

 

From: http://www.ncbi.nlm....pubmed/25619806

 

Cheers

A


  • Informative x 1

#2 niner

  • Guest
  • 16,276 posts
  • 2,000
  • Location:Philadelphia

Posted 03 May 2015 - 01:21 AM

When they checked the toxicity against fibroblasts, I wonder if that was under conditions of simulated sunlight exposure?  I'd expect it to be safe in low light situations, but what happens when the sun hits it?



Click HERE to rent this advertising spot for C60 HEALTH to support Longecity (this will replace the google ad above).

#3 Turnbuckle

  • Location:USA
  • NO

Posted 03 May 2015 - 11:32 AM

Although the nanoemulsion bit might suggest that the C60 is in the form of nC60 particles, this is apparently not the case as they are first dissolving it in palm kernel oil esters.

 

Fullerene was fully dissolved in PKOEs (160 μg/g) using a magnetic stirrer... 

 

Comparison of process parameter optimization using different designs in nanoemulsion-based formulation for transdermal delivery of fullerene

Full text

 

 

 

Which gives a concentration substantially less than typically achieved in EVOO.


  • Good Point x 3

#4 Daniel Cooper

  • Member, Moderator
  • 2,649 posts
  • 633
  • Location:USA

Posted 04 May 2015 - 03:02 PM

When they checked the toxicity against fibroblasts, I wonder if that was under conditions of simulated sunlight exposure?  I'd expect it to be safe in low light situations, but what happens when the sun hits it?

 

 

I know this has been discussed before, but what are the problematic wavelengths for C60 on the skin?  It looks like C60 has some absorption peaks at around 280nm and 350nm (ish).  Which would be UV-C and UV-A respectively.  Are these the problem wavelengths?

 

If those two are the problems I would assume that the 350nm would be the real issue since I don't think much 280nm is going to make it down to us.



#5 Kalliste

  • Guest
  • 1,147 posts
  • 159

Posted 05 May 2015 - 10:00 AM

It's a weird issue. On the one hand it seems like C60 can protect against UV damage, on the other hand it seems like it could increase UV damage...

 

 

Fullerenes as photosensitizers

Another potential medical application of C60 is related to the photoexcitation of fullerenes. In fact, fullerene can be excited from ground state to 1C60 by photoirradiation. This short-lived species is readily converted to long-lived 3C60 via intersystem crossing. In presence of molecular oxygen, the fullerene can decay from its triplet to ground state, transferring its energy to O2, generating singlet oxygen 1O2, known to be highly cytotoxic species. In addition, the high-energy species 1C60 and 3C60 are excellent acceptors and in the presence of a donor, can undergo a different process, being easily reduced to C60•- by electron transfer. Again, in the presence of oxygen, the fullerene radical anion can transfer one electron, producing a superoxide anion radical O2- and hydroxyl radical •OH (Yamakoshi et al 2003). The excited fullerene can be reduced under biological conditions in the presence of biological reducing agents eg, guanosin. On the other hand, singlet oxygen and superoxide radical anions are well known reactive species towards DNA (Da Ros et al 2001). This property of fullerenes renders them potential photosensitizers for their use in photodynamic therapy (PDT). Many fullerene conjugates with different functional groups possessing biological affinity to nucleic acids or proteins, are being investigated for anticancer activity. In particular, conjugates of C60 and, acridine or complementary oligonucleotide, which interact with nucleic acids, have been synthesized with the objective of increasing cytotoxicity (An et al 1996; Yamakoshi et al 1996). Cytotoxicity of dendritic C60 monoadduct and malonic acid C60 trisadduct was investigated on Jurkat cells, and upon exposure to UV light, the cell number was found to drop by approximately 19% within two weeks (Rancan et al 2002). Ji et al also studied the biodistribution and tumor uptake of C60(OH)x in five kinds of tumor models by radiotracer 125I-labeled C60(OH)x. (Ji et al 2006).

Iwamoto and Ymakoshi introduced a highly water soluble C60- N vinylpyrrolidine copolymer as agent for photodynamic therapy (Iwamoto and Yamakoshi 2006). C60 was incorporated covalently into poly (vinylpyrrolidone) chain via radical polymerization. This nanoparticle was the most water-soluble fullerene yet reported and aqueous solutions of concentrations even higher than reported for saturated C60 in toluene could be generated with this method.

Liu et al (2007) demonstrated the use of poly ethylene glycol (PEG)-conjugated fullerene containing Gd3+ ions for photodynamic therapy in combination with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The authors demonstrate through experimental data that tumor PDT effect was significantly promoted by photosensitizer tumor targetability and MRI activity. C60-PEG-Gd was injected into tumor bearing mice. The MRI activity was introduced into C60-PEG of PDT photosensitizer. The chelate incorporation of Gd3+ ions could convert C60-PEG derivative to a photosensitizer with both the diagnostic and therapeutic functions (Liu et al 2007).

Recently, Mroz et al (2007) investigated the photodynamic activity of fullerenes derivatized with hydrophilic and cationic groups against a range of mouse cancer cell lines. They found that, monocationic fullerene is highly effective photosensitizer for killing cancer cells by rapid induction of apoptosis after illumination.

http://www.ncbi.nlm....les/PMC2676811/



#6 Turnbuckle

  • Location:USA
  • NO

Posted 05 May 2015 - 11:34 AM

It's a weird issue. On the one hand it seems like C60 can protect against UV damage, on the other hand it seems like it could increase UV damage...

 

 

 

The solution seems simple enough: apply C60/EVOO. Let soak in. Apply sunscreen.

 

You might also consider adding an oil-soluble antioxidant to the C60/EVOO that isn't UV sensitive, such as astaxanthin, which is now used in some sunscreens. I've been adding that to my C60 mix for some time and haven't noticed any downside, while it does seem to improve the skin more than the mix without it.



#7 bixbyte

  • Guest
  • 559 posts
  • 45
  • Location:End of the Galaxy
  • NO

Posted 05 May 2015 - 02:10 PM

 

It's a weird issue. On the one hand it seems like C60 can protect against UV damage, on the other hand it seems like it could increase UV damage...

 

 

 

The solution seems simple enough: apply C60/EVOO. Let soak in. Apply sunscreen.

 

You might also consider adding an oil-soluble antioxidant to the C60/EVOO that isn't UV sensitive, such as astaxanthin, which is now used in some sunscreens. I've been adding that to my C60 mix for some time and haven't noticed any downside, while it does seem to improve the skin more than the mix without it.

 

 

What happens if the sunscreen is not 100% effective?

 

 

And I quote the beginning of the original first post:

 

Abstract

Despite the fact that intrinsic oxidative stress is inevitable, the extrinsic factor such as ultraviolet radiation enhances reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation resulting in premature skin aging.



#8 Turnbuckle

  • Location:USA
  • NO

Posted 05 May 2015 - 02:27 PM

What happens if the sunscreen is not 100% effective?

 

 

None are. That's why there are no SPF factors of infinity, unless you use heavy clothing or aluminum foil. But your skin can handle some UV with its endogenous antioxidants, just as it can handle the free radicals created by mitochondria.

 

And I quote the beginning of the original first post:

 

Abstract

Despite the fact that intrinsic oxidative stress is inevitable, the extrinsic factor such as ultraviolet radiation enhances reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation resulting in premature skin aging.

 

 

 

Yes, there is always oxidative stress, even if you live in a cave.



#9 bixbyte

  • Guest
  • 559 posts
  • 45
  • Location:End of the Galaxy
  • NO

Posted 05 May 2015 - 02:47 PM

 

What happens if the sunscreen is not 100% effective?

 

 

None are. That's why there are no SPF factors of infinity, unless you use heavy clothing or aluminum foil. But your skin can handle some UV with its endogenous antioxidants, just as it can handle the free radicals created by mitochondria.

 

And I quote the beginning of the original first post:

 

Abstract

Despite the fact that intrinsic oxidative stress is inevitable, the extrinsic factor such as ultraviolet radiation enhances reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation resulting in premature skin aging.

 

 

 

Yes, there is always oxidative stress, even if you live in a cave.

 

 

 

Applying fullerenes to you skin will cause oxidative stress and this could be harmful.

If I live in a cave there is no sunlight.

But no one lives in a cave anymore.

And you are posting that people place fullerenes on their skin and after the molecule is supposedly absorbed place sunscreen on top of the fullerenes on your skin? 

It might be harmful to do this. 


  • Pointless, Timewasting x 1
  • Ill informed x 1

#10 Kalliste

  • Guest
  • 1,147 posts
  • 159

Posted 05 May 2015 - 03:46 PM

It might be good too. For all we know it will turn out that C60 derivatives applied topically will decrease the rate of skin aging dramatically even though it might be harmful if are exposed to powerful UV.







Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: c60, fullerene, skin, aging, collagen

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users