• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In    
  • Create Account
  LongeCity
              Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans

Photo
- - - - -

What is the difference between glucosamine and n acetyl glucosamine?

glucosamine n acetyl glucosamine nag difference

  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

#1 ironfistx

  • Guest
  • 1,172 posts
  • 64
  • Location:Chicago

Posted 19 June 2015 - 05:20 AM


People have mentioned that n acetyl glucosamine is good for anxiety, but other than people saying that here I haven't seen much about it.  When I searched, I found a site which is yahoo answers here https://answers.yaho...20060743AAHGfr8that basically says n acetyl glucosamine isn't as good as glucosamine.  Here is the message:

 

Currently companies marketing N-acetyl-glucosamine, commonly referred to as "NAG," are misleading many physicians into believing that NAG is better absorbed, more stable, and is better utilized than glucosamine sulfate. These contentions are without support in the scientific literature. In fact, the literature contains just the opposite. Glucosamine sulfate is clearly the preferred form.

As mentioned above, detailed human studies on the absorption, distribution, and elimination of orally administered glucosamine sulfate have shown an absorption rate of as high as 98% and that once absorbed it is then distributed primarily to joint tissues where it is incorporated into the connective tissue matrix of cartilage, ligaments, and tendons, In addition, there are the impressive clinical studies on thousands of patients. In contrast, there has never been a double-blind study using NAG for any application. Nor have there ever been any detailed absorption studies on NAG in humans.

Further evidence of the superiority of glucosamine sulfate to NAG is offered by studies in laboratory animals. Over the years, numerous researchers have researchers have repeatedly demonstrated that glucosamine is superior to NAG in terms of absorption and utilization by at least a factor of 2:1.18-29 These researchers have concluded that glucosamine is a more efficient precursor of macromolecular hexosamine [glycosaminoglycans] than N-acetyl-glucosamine does not penetrate the cell membranes and, as a result, is not available for incorporation into glycoproteins and mucopolysaccharides.20



The absorption of NAG is quickly digested by intestinal bacteria; 2) NAG is a known binder of dietary lectins in the gut with the resultant lectin-NAG complex being excreted in the feces; and 3) a large percentage of NAG is broken down by intestinal cells.

NAG differs from glucosamine sulfate in that instead of a sulfur molecule, NAG has a portion of an acetic acid molecule attached to it. Glucosamine sulfate and NAG ware entirely different molecules and appear to be handled by the body differently. The body preferentially utilizes glucosamine sulfate compared to NAG. This preference is exhibited by the fact that the absorption of glucosamine sulfate is an active process.29 In other words, there are mechanisms in the body which are designed specifically for the absorption and utilization of glucosamine sulfate. No such mechanisms exist for NAG.

It is highly unlikely that NAG possesses the same kind of antiarthritic and antireactive properties that glucosamine sulfate has been shown to possess.30-31 In addition to the question of absorption, several studies have shown that the articular tissue is not able to utilize NAG as well as it does glucosamine.18-19

The marketing information on NAG will often use the term slow acetylators to describe a very small group of individuals with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis who are unable to convert glucosamine to NAG as fast as individuals without these diseases. Glucosamine and NAG are necessary in the manufacture of mucin, the glycoprotein lining of the intestinal tract.

Distributors of NAG hold up only one study as evidence that NAG is better. The study demonstrated that when intestinal cells from patients with Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis were bathed in a solution containing a ratio of radioactive NAG:glucosamine of 10:1, the cells incorporated more NAG than the cells from individuals without these diseases.30 These results are expected due to the higher concentrations of NAG in the media artificially promoting passive diffusion to a greater extent than the active accumulation of glucosamine. How distributors of NAG can then use this information to claim that NAG is better than glucosamine sulfate is puzzling since the significance of this test tube study is unclear and other studies have demonstrated an increased utilization of glucosamine in these patients.33

The problem of acetylation of glucosamine is not a factor for most people as it is not a rate-limiting step in the manufacture of glycosaminoglycans, instead it is the manufacture of glucosamine. Another form of glucosamine presently being marketed is glucosamine hydrochloride (HCI). As with NAG, the research simply does not support the use of glucosamine HCI.

It appears the sulfur component of glucosamine sulfate may be critical to the beneficial effects noted. Sulfur is an essential nutrient for joint tissue where it functions in the stabilization of the connective tissue matrix of cartilage, tendons, and ligaments. As far back as the 1930's, researchers demonstrated that individuals with arthritis are commonly deficient in this essential nutrient.34 Restoring sulfur levels brought about significant benefit to these patients.35 Therefore, it appears the sulfur portion of glucosamine sulfate is extremely important and is another reason why glucosamine sulfate is the preferred form of glucosamine.

Dosage Information
The standard dose for glucosamine sulfate is 500 mg three times per day. Obese individuals may need higher dosages based on their body weight (20 mg/kg body weight/day).

Glucosamine sulfate is extremely well-tolerated. In addition, there are no contra-indications or adverse interactions with drugs. Individuals taking diuretics may need to take higher dosages. Glucosamine sulfate may cause some gastrointestinal upset (nausea, heartburn, etc.) in rare instances. If this occurs, have the patient try taking it with meals.

 

And then some other person said:

 

The above answer is incorrect and outdated:

"N-acetyl-glucosamine (NAG)

Another possible alternative is N-acetyl-glucosamine (NAG) however, NAG differs from D-Glucosamine Hydrochloride and D-Glucosamine Sulphate; instead of a sulphur or chloride molecule, NAG has a larger, more complex molecule attached to it. As a result, NAG is an entirely different molecule and appears to be handled quite differently by the body."

 

That writer then put a link to this site: http://www.a1msm.co....supplement.html

 

And that site says:

 

Studies have demonstrated that NAG is inferior to other forms of Glucosamine in terms of absorption and utilisation.

 

Ther eare no studies mentioned though.

 

THat site says the same thing that is in the repyl, other than the quested section.

 

Has anyone used NAG and what effects have you had?

 

 



#2 zorba990

  • Guest
  • 1,601 posts
  • 315

Posted 19 June 2015 - 11:25 PM

Anti inflammatory activity of NAG looks to be greater
http://www.jimmunol....166/8/5155.full


N-Acetylglucosamine Prevents IL-1β-Mediated Activation of Human Chondrocytes1
Alexander R. Shikhman*,†, Klaus Kuhn†, Nada Alaaeddine† and Martin Lotz2,†
+ Author Affiliations

*Division of Rheumatology, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, CA 92037; and
†Division of Arthritis Research, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037

Next Section
Abstract

Glucosamine represents one of the most commonly used drugs to treat osteoarthritis. However, mechanisms of its antiarthritic activities are still poorly understood. The present study identifies a novel mechanism of glucosamine-mediated anti-inflammatory activity. It is shown that both glucosamine and N-acetylglucosamine inhibit IL-1β- and TNF-α-induced NO production in normal human articular chondrocytes. The effect of the sugars on NO production is specific, since several other monosaccharides, including glucose, glucuronic acid, and N-acetylmannosamine, do not express this activity. Furthermore, N-acetylglucosamine polymers, including the dimer and the trimer, also do not affect NO production. The observed suppression of IL-1β-induced NO production is associated with inhibition of inducible NO synthase mRNA and protein expression. In addition, N-acetylglucosamine also suppresses the production of IL-1β-induced cyclooxygenase-2 and IL-6. The constitutively expressed cyclooxygenase-1, however, was not affected by the sugar. N-acetylglucosamine-mediated inhibition of the IL-1β response of human chondrocytes was not associated with the decreased inhibition of the mitogen-activated protein kinases c-Jun N-terminal kinase, extracellular signal-related kinase, and p38, nor with activation of the transcription factor NF-κB. In conclusion, these results demonstrate that N-acetylglucosamine expresses a unique range of activities and identifies a novel mechanism for the inhibition of inflammatory processes.

Previous Section
Next Section
Introduction

Osteoarthritis (OA)3 is the most common joint disorder and has an immense socioeconomic impact (1, 2, 3). However, the conservative treatment of OA is still limited to a few classes of medications, such as acetaminophen, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, injectable intraarticular corticosteroids, and hyaluronic acid, which provide primarily pain relief, but have not yet been demonstrated to interfere with the progression of the disease (4, 5, 6).

Many studies have demonstrated that cartilage from patients with OA is characterized by accelerated turnover of the cartilage matrix components and by inadequate repair (7, 8). Glucosamine (GlcN) salts (sulfate and chloride) represent a new generation of drugs, which possess potentially chondroprotective or disease-modifying properties (4, 9, 10), and were originally suggested to promote the repair of damaged cartilage. Since the first publication of W. Bohne in 1969 showing that GlcN can be used as a single pharmacologic agent to treat OA (11), the preparation has gained considerable popularity, and now is being consumed by many OA patients. Despite the increased use of GlcN in the treatment of OA, the mechanisms accounting for its in vivo and in vitro activity are still far from clear.

The current study presents experimental evidence that GlcN, and, to a higher degree, N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc), possess a unique range of anti-inflammatory activities and inhibit NO, cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), and IL-6 production induced in cultured human articular chondrocytes by IL-1β.

Previous Section
Next Section
Materials and Methods

Source of tissue and cell culture
Normal cartilage was obtained from autopsy services and tissue banks. Articular cartilage was harvested from the femoral condyles and the tibial plateaus. All tissue samples were graded according to a modified Mankin scale (12), and only cartilage without evidence of OA was used as a source of chondrocytes. The interval between death and the time the cartilage was harvested from these knee joints in the laboratory was at least 24 h and ranged up to 96 h. Cartilage shavings were harvested by the tissue banks within 24 post mortem, placed in tissue culture medium (DMEM, 10% FBS, penicillin, streptomycin), and shipped to the laboratory at 4°C. This tissue was processed in the laboratory within 24 h after harvest.

Chondrocytes were isolated from the cartilage by collagenase digestion and maintained in continuous monolayer cultures in DMEM containing 10% FBS. Cell viability after chondrocyte isolation by collagenase digestion of normal cartilage is >95%. This level is maintained for at least 96 h post mortem. Studies on IL-1 effects as a catabolic response showed no apparent changes as a function of variations in the time between death and tissue processing when NO and IL-6 release were measured.

Experiments reported in this work were performed with primary or first passage cells.

Monosaccharides and GlcNAc polymers
GlcN, GlcNAc, glucose, and glucuronic acid N-acetylmannosamine were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). GlcNAc dimer (N,N′-diacetylchitobiose) and GlcNAc trimer (N,N′,N″-triacetylchitotriose) were purchased from TRC (Toronto, Canada).

Quantification of nitrites
Chondrocytes were plated at 40,000 cells/well in 96-well plates in the presence of 1% FBS. After 48 h, the medium was changed, and the cells were stimulated with IL-1β (Sigma) at a concentration of 5 ng/ml for 24 h. NO production was detected as NO2− accumulation in the culture supernatants by the Griess reaction, as described elsewhere (13).

IL-6 measurement
IL-6 in the culture supernatants was measured by ELISA (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) in accordance with the supplier’s protocol.

Western blot analysis
Whole cell extracts were prepared from 3 × 106 chondrocytes stimulated as described in Results by lysing the cells on the plate with ice-cold lysis buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.6), 158 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1% SDS, 1% Triton X-100, 1 μg/ml leupeptin, 1 μg/ml aprotinin, and 0.5 mM PMSF, which was added immediately before use). The lysates were transferred to Eppendorf tubes and centrifuged at 20,000 × g for 30 min at 4°C. The supernatants were transferred into fresh tubes, and the protein concentration was determined by Bradford assay. Similar amounts of protein were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred to a nitrocellulose filter (Schleicher & Schuell, Keene, NH) by electroblotting. The filter was blocked overnight in 5% milk powder/TBST solution and then further incubated with one of the following Abs: anti-inducible NO synthase (anti-iNOS; C-19; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), anti-COX-2 (Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI), anti-COX-1 (H-3; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-phospho-c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK; phospho-Thr183/Tyr185; New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA), anti-phospho-p38 mitogen-activated protein (MAP; phospho-Thr80/Tyr182; New England Biolabs), or anti-phospho-extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK; phospho-Thr180/Tyr182; New England Biolabs) for 2 h. The membranes were washed three times with TBST and then further incubated with the appropriate HRP-labeled secondary Ab in 5% milk powder/TBST and developed using an ECL system (Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL).

Northern blot analysis
Total RNA was isolated from 2 × 106 chondrocytes stimulated as described in Results using the STAT-60 reagent (Tel-Test, Friendswood, TX). The RNA from each sample was quantified photometrically, and 5 μg was separated on 1.2% agarose/6% formaldehyde gels. After electrophoresis, the gels were photographed, and the RNA was transferred onto Hybond-N nylon membranes (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD) by capillary blotting. The membranes were air dried and incubated for 2 h at 80°C. Prehybridization was done for 2 h at 60°C in 5× SCC, 1 mM EDTA, 0.2% SDS, and 5× Denhardt solution. Radiolabeled probe was added and hybridization was conducted overnight at 60°C. After hybridization, the filters were rinsed twice in 2× SSC/0.1% SDS; washed once in 2× SSC/0.1% SDS at 60°C; and once in 0.2× SSC/0.1% SDS at 60°C. The membranes were covered with Saran wrap and exposed with intensifying screen for 12 h at −70°C. The probes used for the hybridization were prepared as described earlier (14, 15).

EMSA
Nuclear protein extracts were prepared as follows: 2 × 106 chondrocytes were stimulated as indicated in Results. The cells were harvested by trypsinization, washed once with ice-cold PBS, and lysed in 10 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.5) containing 2 mM MgCl2, 140 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM DTT, 0.05% Triton X-100, 0.5 mM PMSF, 1 μg/ml leupeptin, and 1 μg/ml aprotinin. The nuclei were spun down, resuspended in 20 mM HEPES buffer (pH 7.9) containing 25% glycerol, 420 mM NaCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM DTT, 0.5 mM PMSF, 1 μg/ml leupeptin, and 1 μg/ml aprotinin, and rotated at 4°C for 30 min. After removal of the nuclear debris by centrifugation, the protein concentration of the lysate was determined using the Bradford assay. Equal amounts of the nuclear extracts (2 μg) were incubated for 15 min at room temperature with poly(dI-dC)poly(dI-dC) (0.1 mg/ml), BSA (1 mg/ml), 1 × 105 counts of double-stranded radiolabeled oligodeoxynucleotide containing the NF-κB consensus DNA binding site (sequence: 5′-GATCGAGGGGACTTTCCCTAGC-3′) in 20 mM HEPES buffer (pH 7.9) containing 10% glycerol, 420 mM NaCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM DTT, and 0.5 mM PMSF. For competition experiments, unlabeled NF-κB oligodeoxynucleotide or oligodeoxynucleotide containing the Oct-1 consensus sequence was added at 100-fold molar excess to the binding reactions 10 min before the addition of radiolabeled NF-κB oligodeoxynucleotide. The binding reactions were loaded onto 6% TGE (50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 380 mM glycine, and 2 mM EDTA) native polyacrylamide gel and electrophoresed for 2 h at 4°C. The gels were then dried and exposed for 16–48 h with intensifying screen at −80°C.

Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis of the generated data was performed with the aid of StatMost 32 program for Windows (Dataxiom Software, Los Angeles, CA).

Previous Section
Next Section
Results

GlcN and GlcNAc inhibit IL-1β-induced NO production by cultured human articular chondrocytes
IL-1β is known as a potent inducer of NO production in cultured human articular chondrocytes (16). In the first series of experiments, we demonstrated that both GlcN and GlcNAc were capable of suppressing NO production triggered by IL-1β (Fig. 1⇓). The differences between NO production in chondrocyte cultures stimulated with IL-1β and chondrocyte cultures stimulated with IL-1β plus GlcN or GlcNAc were statistically significant, p < 0.001. When used in equimolar concentrations, GlcNAc demonstrated stronger inhibition of NO production than GlcN (the difference between these two groups was statistically significant, p < 0.01). Maximal inhibitory effect of GlcNAc was observed with a concentration of 20 mM; concentrations lower than 1 mM were insufficient in the suppression of NO production (Fig. 2⇓). The IC50 for GlcNAc was 4.1 ± 1.3 mM; the IC50 for GlcN was 14.9 ± 2.1 mM, p < 0.01.


FIGURE 1.

View larger version:
In this page In a new window
FIGURE 1.
Effect of GlcN and GlcNAc on IL-1β-induced NO production in cultured human articular chondrocytes. Human articular chondrocytes were stimulated with IL-1β (5 ng/ml) and incubated with GlcN or GlcNAc (10 mM) for 24 h. NO production was measured in culture supernatants by the Griess reaction. This figure represents mean ± SEM of the data obtained from seven independent experiments using seven different chondrocyte donors. CTRL, control.


FIGURE 2.

View larger version:
In this page In a new window
FIGURE 2.
Dose response of IL-1β-mediated NO production to GlcN and GlcNAc in human articular chondrocytes. Human articular chondrocytes were stimulated with IL-1β (5 ng/ml) and incubated with various concentrations of GlcN or GlcNAc for 24 h. NO production was measured in culture supernatants by the Griess reaction.

Both GlcN and GlcNAc at doses up to 20 mM did not affect cell viability measured by MTT assay (17) (data not shown).

Specificity of the NO inhibition
To analyze the sugar specificity of the discovered phenomenon, we compared the effect of glucose, glucuronic acid, N-acetylmannosamine, N-acetylgalactosamine, GlcNAc, and GlcN on IL-1β-induced NO production. When used at a concentration of 10 mM, only GlcNAc and N-acetylgalactosamine demonstrated inhibitory activity, suggesting specificity of this effect (Fig. 3⇓). GlcNAc polymers, including GlcNAc dimer and GlcNAc trimer, did not express any inhibitory activity against IL-1β-induced NO production (Fig. 4⇓).


FIGURE 3.

View larger version:
In this page In a new window
FIGURE 3.
Effect of selected monosaccharides on IL-1β-induced NO production in human articular chondrocytes. Human articular chondrocytes were stimulated with IL-1β (5 ng/ml) and incubated with selected monosaccharides at a concentration of 10 mM for 24 h. NO production was measured in culture supernatants by the Griess reaction. This figure represents mean ± SEM of the data obtained from five independent experiments using five different chondrocyte donors. CTRL, Control; Glc, glucose; GlucurAc, glucuronic acid; MannAc, N-acetylmannosamine. The differences between GlcNAc + IL-1 vs IL-1, GalNAc + IL-1 vs IL-1, and GlcN + IL-1 vs IL-1 were statistically significant with p <0.01, 0.01, and 0.02, respectively.


FIGURE 4.

View larger version:
In this page In a new window
FIGURE 4.
Effect of GlcNAc and its oligomers on IL-1β-induced NO production in cultured human articular chondrocytes. Human articular chondrocytes were stimulated with IL-1β (5 ng/ml) and incubated with selected GlcNAc oligomers at a concentration of 10 mM for 24 h. Production of NO was measured in culture supernatants by the Griess reaction. This figure represents mean ± SEM of the data obtained from three independent experiments using three different chondrocyte donors. The difference between GlcNAc + IL-1 vs IL-1 groups was statistically significant, p < 0.02. The differences between (GlcNAc)2 + IL-1 vs IL-1 and (GlcNAc)3 + IL-1 vs IL-1 were not statistically significant. CTRL, Control.

GlcNAc inhibits iNOS expression
To investigate whether GlcNAc suppresses the enzymatic activity of iNOS, the expression of the corresponding protein, we analyzed the effect of GlcNAc on the expression of both iNOS protein (Western immunoblot) and iNOS mRNA (Nothern blot). Results of the experiments clearly demonstrated that GlcNAc strongly inhibited the expression of both iNOS mRNA and protein (Figs. 5⇓ and 6⇓).


FIGURE 5.

View larger version:
In this page In a new window
FIGURE 5.
Effect of GlcNAc on IL-1β-induced iNOS and COX-2 mRNA expression. Human articular chondrocytes were stimulated with IL-1β (5 ng/ml) and incubated with GlcNAc (10 mM) for 24 h. Expression of iNOS and COX-2 mRNA was measured by Northern blotting. CTRL, Control.


FIGURE 6.

View larger version:
In this page In a new window
FIGURE 6.
Effect of GlcNAc on IL-1β-induced iNOS protein expression. Human articular chondrocytes were stimulated with IL-1β (5 ng/ml) and incubated with GlcNAc (10 mM) for 24 h. Expression of iNOS was measured by Western immunoblot using anti-iNOS (C-19; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) Abs. CTRL, Control.

Differential effects of GlcNAc on COX-2 and COX-1 expression
As a part of the analysis of its anti-inflammatory activities, we studied the effect of GlcNAc on COX-2 expression in cultured human articular chondrocytes stimulated with IL-1β. Results of the experiments demonstrated that GlcNAc inhibited the expression of COX-2 protein measured in the Western immunoblot and COX-2 mRNA measured in the Northern blot (Figs. 7⇓A and 5). In contrast to COX-2, GlcNAc did not affect the expression of COX-1 protein (Fig. 7⇓B).


FIGURE 7.

View larger version:
In this page In a new window
FIGURE 7.
Effect of GlcNAc on IL-1β-induced COX-2 (A) and COX-1 (B) protein expression. Human articular chondrocytes were stimulated with IL-1β (5 ng/ml) and incubated with GlcNAc (10 mM) for 24 h. Expression of COX-2 and COX-1 was analyzed in Western immunoblot. CTRL, Control.

Effect of GlcNAc on IL-1β-induced IL-6 production by cultured human articular chondrocytes
In addition to NO and COX-2, GlcNAc was capable of inhibiting IL-6 production in cultured human articular chondrocytes stimulated with IL-1β (Fig. 8⇓). The differences were statistically significant (p < 0.001). Therefore, GlcNAc is capable of suppressing several IL-1β-inducible products of inflammation, but does not inhibit constitutively expressed molecules.


FIGURE 8.

View larger version:
In this page In a new window
FIGURE 8.
Effect of GlcNAc on IL-1β-induced IL-6 production in cultured human articular chondrocytes. Human articular chondrocytes were stimulated with IL-1β (5 ng/ml) and incubated with GlcNAc (10 mM) for 24 h. Production of IL-6 was measured in culture supernatants by ELISA. This figure represents mean ± SEM of the data obtained from three independent experiments using three different chondrocyte donors. CTRL, Control.

Effect of GlcNAc on IL-1β-induced phosphorylation of ERK, JNK, and p38 MAP kinases
Intracellular signaling in the IL-1β pathway results in activation of several protein kinases, including the MAP kinases (18). GlcNAc residues participate in the dynamic process of protein O-glycosylation, which utilizes serine residues as anchoring sites. Therefore, by competing for the same binding sites, O-glycosyl residues could diminish the efficacy of serine phosphorylation and thus interfere with signal transduction. To address this potential mechanism, we analyzed the effect of GlcNAc on ERK, JNK, and p38 MAP kinase activation in chondrocytes induced by IL-1β. The experiments demonstrated that GlcNAc does not inhibit the ERK, JNK, and p38 MAP kinase activation (Fig. 9⇓).


FIGURE 9.

View larger version:
In this page In a new window
FIGURE 9.
GlcNAc does not inhibit IL-1β-induced MAP kinase activation. Human articular chondrocytes were stimulated with IL-1β (5 ng/ml) and incubated with GlcNAc (10 mM) for 24 h. Activation of ERK (A), JNK (B), and p38 MAP © kinases was measured by Western immunoblot. CTRL, Control.

Effect of GlcNAc on IL-1β-induced nuclear translocation of NF-κB
IL-1β-mediated induction of certain mediators of inflammation, including NO, COX-2, and IL-6, is associated with translocation of NF-κB dimers from the cytoplasm to the nucleus, where they bind target genes and regulate their transcription (19, 20, 21). The process of NF-κB activation depends on phosphorylation of two serines (Ser32 and Ser36 in I-κBα (inhibitory protein that dissociates from NF-κB)) in the N-terminal regulatory domain of I-κB (22). To determine whether GlcNAc-mediated suppression of IL-1β-induced NO, COX-2, and IL-6 production depends upon suppression of the NF-κB activation, we studied nuclear translocation of NF-κB in chondrocytes stimulated with IL-1β alone in comparison with chondrocytes stimulated with IL-1β and treated with GlcNAc. These studies demonstrated that GlcNAc did not affect IL-1β-induced nuclear translocation of NF-κB (Fig. 10⇓).


FIGURE 10.

View larger version:
In this page In a new window
FIGURE 10.
Effect of GlcNAc on IL-1β-induced nuclear translocation of NF-κB. Human articular chondrocytes were stimulated with IL-1β (5 ng/ml) and incubated with GlcNAc (10 mM) for 24 h. Nuclear translocation of NF-κB was analyzed by EMSA. sp. comp., Competition with unlabeled NK-κB oligonucleotide; unsp. comp., competition with unlabeled Oct-1 oligonucleotide.

Previous Section
Next Section
Discussion

Despite the fact that GlcN represents one of the most commonly used drugs to treat OA, the molecular mechanisms of its activity are still poorly understood. Available experimental data indicate that GlcN possesses both chondroprotective and anti-inflammatory effects. The chondroprotective action of GlcN manifests as accelerated of glycosaminoglycan synthesis in cultured chondrocytes and cartilage tissue. This was demonstrated for cartilage tissue and cells isolated from various species and sources, including chicken embryo cartilage (23), rat acetabular cartilage (24), and chondrocytes from femoral heads of patients with OA (25, 26). In addition, GlcN was shown to restore mechanical properties of the bovine cartilage explants treated with IL-1α (27). GlcN-induced up-regulation of glycosaminoglycan synthesis represents a complex metabolic process, which is potentially mediated through several mechanisms, such as GlcN directly entering the hexosamine pathway and circumventing the negative feedback control from UDP-GlcNAc (28) and up-regulation of TGFβ1 production (29). Recently, a novel mechanism of GlcN-mediated chondroprotection was described, which involves the inhibition of aggrecanase activity in bovine cartilage explants and rat chondrosarcoma cells (30) via suppression of glycosylphosphatidylinositol-linked proteins (31).

Anti-inflammatory mechanisms, besides GlcN-induced up-regulation of glycosaminoglycan synthesis, are probably contributing to its antiarthritic activities as well. GlcN had anti-inflammatory activity and protected rats from paw edema induced by bradykinin, serotonin, and histamine (32). GlcN also protected animals against serositis induced by carragenan, rat peritonitis induced by Formalin, and mouse peritonitis induced by acetic acid (32). GlcN did not suppress COX or proteolytic enzymes in the inflamed rat paw, but it did suppress superoxide generation and lysosomal enzyme activities in rat liver (32). Orally administered GlcN also expressed anti-inflammatory activity in kaolin or adjuvant-induced arthritis in rats (33). However, in the studies cited above, antiexudative and anti-inflammatory activities of GlcN were lower as compared with those of acetylsalicylic acid or indomethacin. GlcN was found to be synergistic in its antiexudative activity with indomethacin, piroxicam, and diclofenac in a mouse model of aseptic inflammation (34).

The present study is the first to examine the effect of GlcN and GlcNAc on human chondrocyte response toward the stimulation with IL-1β, and it describes a novel mechanism of GlcN-mediated anti-inflammatory activity. Results of our experiments clearly indicated that GlcN, and to a higher degree, GlcNAc are capable of inhibiting IL-1β-induced NO production in cultured human articular chondrocytes. The effect of sugars on NO production is specific since several other monosaccharides, including glucose, glucuronic acid, and N-acetylmannosamine do not express this activity. Furthermore, we demonstrated that GlcNAc polymers, including the dimer and the trimer, also do not affect NO production. The observed suppression of IL-1β-induced NO production is the consequence of inhibition of iNOS protein and mRNA expression. In addition to its NO-inhibitory activity, GlcNAc also suppressed the production of IL-1β-induced COX-2 and IL-6. The expression of COX-1, however, was not affected by the sugar. Previously, Setnikar et al. (32) described a negative effect of GlcN on the COX activity of inflamed rat paw tissues. These data do not contradict our results for the following reasons. First, the authors used GlcN and not GlcNAc. Second, the dose of GlcN used to treat rats was much lower than the doses that express anti-inflammatory activities in vitro. Third, the authors did not make any distinction between COX-1 and COX-2.

GlcNAc did not suppress all responses in chondrocytes induced by IL-1β. For example, it did not suppress the IL-1β-mediated increase in hexosaminidase secretion (data not shown). Moreover, it was synergistic with IL-1β in the induction of TGFβ1 (data not shown). Collectively, these findings suggest that GlcNAc selectively inhibits cytokine-induced gene expression and the production of certain proinflammatory mediators.

Several aspects of the discovered GlcNAc-mediated activity require more detailed discussion. Our experiments showed that both GlcN and GlcNAc in the lower millimolar range measurably inhibited NO production; concentrations below 1 mM were not effective. This concentration range is identical to that previously described for GlcN-induced up-regulation of TGF-β production in cultured porcine mesangial cells (29). The relatively high concentrations of GlcN and GlcNAc required for the mediation of their anti-inflammatory activity most likely reflect the competition between these sugars and glucose from culture media for entering the cells via glucose transporter molecules (35). It is important to state that therapeutic concentrations of the aminosugars, which can be reached in humans upon oral administration of GlcN at the accepted dose of 1500 mg/day, are much lower than those used in the present publication. Therefore, the in vitro data regarding the anti-inflammatory mechanisms of GlcNAc and GlcN activities cannot be directly applied for explanation of the therapeutic efficacy of GlcN in patients with OA.

GlcNAc has several potential advantages over GlcN as a potential therapeutic anti-inflammatory agent. First, upon entering the cell, GlcN undergoes phosphorylation by glucokinase and competes with glucose for binding to glucokinase (36), which can result in GlcN-induced insulin resistance (37). GlcNAc, on the other hand, has much lower affinity toward glucokinase as compared with glucose and GlcN, and therefore does not significantly affect glucose metabolism (38). Second, the product of GlcN phosphorylation, GlcN-6 phosphate, is an allosteric inhibitor of glucokinase (39). This limits the flux of GlcN via the hexosamine pathway. Third, upon entering the cell, GlcNAc undergoes phosphorylation by GlcNAc kinase and does not compete with glucose for phosphorylation (40). This product of phosphorylation enters the hexosamine pathway more distally than GlcN-6 phosphate, and does not possess known negative allosteric effects toward glucokinase.

The present study also addressed potential mechanism involved in GlcNAc-mediated inhibition of the IL-1β response. One possibility is a GlcNAc-mediated inhibition of phosphorylation events in the IL-1β signaling cascade. One of the end products of the hexosamine pathway, UDP-GlcNAc, was shown to participate in the dynamic process of protein O-glycosylation, which utilizes serine or threonine residues as anchoring sides (41). Potentially, O-glycosylation of the serine residues can compete with the phosphorylation of the same residues, resulting in the impairment of intracellular signal transduction cascades (42). To address this possibility, we analyzed the effect of GlcNAc on ERK, JNK, and p38 MAP kinase activation, and on nuclear translocation of NF-κB in chondrocytes stimulated by IL-1β. The activation of these MAP kinases and of NF-κB are central events in the chondrocyte response to IL-1β and related cytokines. Results of the experiments revealed that measurable GlcNAc did not inhibit IL-1β-induced activation of ERK, JNK, and p38 MAP kinases, or the nuclear translocation of NF-κB. Additional experiments will be focused on possible targets for O-glycosylation interfering with IL-1β-activated signal transduction cascade.

In conclusion, the study demonstrates that GlcNAc expresses anti-inflammatory and chondroprotective activities by interfering with cytokine-inducible gene expression in chondrocytes.

Previous Section
Next Section
Acknowledgments

We thank Diana C. Brinson, Jackie Quach, and Jean Valbracht for excellent technical support.

Previous Section
Next Section
Footnotes

↵1 This study was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants AG07996 (to M.L.) and AT00052 (to A.R.S.).
↵2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Martin Lotz, Division of Arthritis Research, The Scripps Research Institute, 10550 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037. E-mail address: mlotz@scripps.edu
↵3 Abbreviations used in this paper: OA, osteoarthritis; COX, cyclooxygenase; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; GlcN, glucosamine; GlcNAc, N-acetylglucosamine; iNOS, inducible NO synthase; JNK, c-Jun N-terminal kinase; MAP, mitogen-activated protein.
Received June 20, 2000.
Accepted February 6, 2001.
Copyright © 2001 by The American Association of Immunologists
Previous Section

References

↵ Lawrence, R. C., C. G. Helmick, F. C. Arnett, R. A. Deyo, D. T. Felson, E. H. Giannini, S. P. Heyse, R. Hirsch, M. C. Hochberg, G. G. Hunder, et al 1998. Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and selected musculoskeletal disorders in the United States. Arthritis Rheum. 41: 778 CrossRefMedline
↵ Gabriel, S. E., C. S. Crowson, M. E. Campion, W. M. O’Fallon. 1997. Direct medical costs unique to people with arthritis. J. Rheumatol. 24: 719 Medline
↵ March, L. M., C. J. Bachmeier. 1997. Economics of osteoarthritis: a global perspective. Baillieres Clin. Rheumatol. 11: 817 CrossRefMedline
↵ Altman, R. D., C. J. Lozada. 1998. Practice guidelines in the management of osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 6: (Suppl. A):22 CrossRefMedline
↵ Hochberg, M. C., R. D. Altman, K. D. Brandt, B. M. Clark, P. A. Dieppe, M. R. Griffin, R. W. Moskowitz, T. J. Schnitzer. 1995. Guidelines for the medical management of osteoarthritis. I. Osteoarthritis of the hip. Arthritis Rheum. 38: 1535 CrossRefMedline
↵ Hochberg, M. C., R. D. Altman, K. D. Brandt, B. M. Clark, P. A. Dieppe, M. R. Griffin, R. W. Moskowitz, T. J. Schnitzer. 1995. Guidelines for the medical management of osteoarthritis. II. Osteoarthritis of the knee. Arthritis Rheum. 38: 1541 CrossRefMedline
↵ Inerot, S., D. Heinegard, L. Audell, S.-E. Olsson. 1978. Articular-cartilage proteoglycans in aging and osteoarthritis. Biochem. J. 169: 143 Abstract/FREE Full Text
↵ Dieppe, P.. 1995. Osteoarthritis and molecular markers: a rheumatologist’s prospective. Acta Orthop. Scand. 66: (Suppl. 266):1 Medline
↵ Lozada, C. J., R. D. Altman. 1997. Chondroprotection in osteoarthritis. Bull. Rheum. Dis. 46: 5
↵ Mevorach, D., C. J. Menkes. 1994. Osteoarthritis and chondroprotection. Isr. J. Med. Sci. 30: 928 Medline
↵ Bohne, W.. 1969. Glukosamine in der konservativen Arthrosebehandlung. Med. Welt 30: 1668 Medline
↵ Mankin, H. J., H. Dorfman, L. Lippielo, A. Zarins. 1971. Biochemical and metabolic abnormalities in articular cartilage from osteo-arthritic human hips. II. Correlation of morphology with biochemical and metabolic data. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 53: 523 Medline
↵ Hevel, J. M., M. A. Marletta. 1994. Nitric-oxide synthase assays. Methods Enzymol. 233: 250 CrossRefMedline
↵ Geng, Y., B. Zhang, M. Lotz. 1993. Protein tyrosine kinase activation is required for lipopolysaccharide induction of cytokines in human blood monocytes. J. Immunol. 151: 6692 Abstract
↵ Geller, D. A., C. J. Lowenstein, R. A. Shapiro, A. K. Nussler, M. Di Silvio, S. C. Wang, D. K. Nakayama, R. L. Simmons, S. H. Snyder, T. R. Billiar. 1993. Molecular cloning and expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase from human hepatocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90: 3491 Abstract/FREE Full Text
↵ Geng, Y., R. Maier, M. Lotz. 1995. Tyrosine kinases are involved with the expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase in human articular chondrocytes. J. Cell. Physiol. 163: 545 CrossRefMedline
↵ Park, J. G., B. S. Kramer, S. M. Steinberg, J. Carmichael, J. M. Collins, J. D. Minna, A. F. Gazdar. 1987. Chemosensitivity testing of human colorectal carcinoma cell lines using a tetrazolium-based colorimetric assay. Cancer Res. 47: 5875 Abstract/FREE Full Text
↵ Geng, Y., J. Valbracht, M. Lotz. 1996. Selective activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase subgroup c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase and p38 by IL-1 and TNF in human articular chondrocytes. J. Clin. Invest. 98: 2425 CrossRefMedline
↵ Chu, S. C., J. Marks-Konczalik, H. P. Wu, T. C. Banks, J. Moss. 1998. Analysis of the cytokine-stimulated human inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) gene: characterization of differences between human and mouth iNOS promoters. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 248: 871 CrossRefMedline
↵ Newton, R., D. A. Stevens, L. A. Hart, M. Lindsay, I. M. Adcock, P. J. Barnes. 1997. Superinduction of COX-2 mRNA by cycloheximide and interleukin-1β involves increased transcription and correlates with increased TNF-κB and JNK activation. FEBS Lett. 418: 135 CrossRefMedline
↵ Parikh, A. A., A. L. Salzman, C. D. Kane, J. E. Fisher, P. O. Hasselgren. 1997. IL-6 production in human epithelial cells following stimulation with IL-1β is associated with activation of the transcription factor NF-κB. J. Surg. Res. 69: 139 CrossRefMedline
↵ Karin, M.. 1999. The beginning of the end: IκB kinase and NF-κB activation. J. Biol. Chem. 274: 27339 FREE Full Text
↵ Roden, L.. 1956. Effect of hexosamines on the synthesis of chondroitin sulfuric acid in vitro. Arkiv Kemi. 10: 345
↵ Vidal y Plana, R. R., D. Bizzarri, A. L. Rovati. 1978. Articular cartilage pharmacology. I. In vitro studies on glucosamine and non steroidal antiinflammatory drugs. Pharmacol. Res. Commun. 10: 557 CrossRefMedline
↵ Bassleer, C., Y. Henrotin, P. Franchimont. 1992. In vitro evaluation of drugs proposed as chondroprotective agents. Int. J. Tissue React. 14: 231 Medline
↵ Bassleer, C., L. Rovati, P. Franchimont. 1998. Stimulation of proteoglycan production by glucosamine sulfate in chondrocytes isolated from human osteoarthritic articular cartilage in vitro. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 6: 427 CrossRefMedline
↵ Patwari, P., B. Kurz, J. D. Sandy, A. J. Grodzinsky. 2000. Mannosamine inhibits aggrecanase mediated changes in the physical properties and biochemical composition of articular cartilage. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 374: 79 CrossRefMedline
↵ Kornfeld, S., R. Kornfeld, E. F. Neufeld, P. J. O’Brien. 1964. The feedback control of sugar nucleotide biosynthesis in liver. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 52: 371 FREE Full Text
↵ Kolm-Litty, V., U. Sauer, A. Nerlich, R. Lehmann, E. D. Schleicher. 1998. High glucose-induced transforming growth factor β1 production is mediated by the hexosamine pathway in porcine glomerular mesangial cells. J. Clin. Invest. 101: 160 CrossRefMedline
↵ Sandy, J. D., D. Gamett, V. Thompson, C. Verscharen. 1998. Chondrocyte-mediated catabolism of aggrecan: aggrecanase-dependent cleavage induced by interleukin-1 or retinoic acid can be inhibited by glucosamine. Biochem. J. 335: 59 Abstract/FREE Full Text
↵ Sandy, J. D., V. Thompson, C. Verscharen, D. Gamett. 1999. Chondrocyte-mediated catabolism of aggrecan: evidence for a glycosylphosphatidylinositol-linked protein in the aggrecanase response to interleukin-1 or retinoic acid. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 367: 258 CrossRefMedline
↵ Setnikar, I., R. Cereda, M. A. Pacini, L. Revel. 1991. Antireactive properties of glucosamine sulfate. Arzneim.-Forsch./Drug Res. 41: 157
↵ Setnikar, I., M. A. Pacini, L. Revel. 1991. Antiarthritic effects of glucosamine sulfate studied in animal models. Arzneim.-Forsch./Drug Res. 41: 542
↵ Zupanets, I. A., S. M. Drogovoz, N. V. Bezdetko, I. E. Rechkiman, A. N. Semyonov. 1991. Influence of glucosamine on the antiexudative effect of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 54: 61
↵ Rauchman, M. I., J. C. Wasserman, D. M. Cohen, D. L. Perkins, S. C. Hebert, E. Milford, S. R. Gullans. 1992. Expression of GLUT-2 cDNA in human B lymphocytes: analysis of glucose transport using flow cytometry. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1111: 231 Medline
↵ Van Schaftigen, E.. 1995. Glucosamine-sensitive and -insensitive detritiation of [2–3H]glucose in isolated rat hepatocytes: a study of the contributions of glucokinase and glucose-6-phosphatase. Biochem. J. 308: 23 Abstract/FREE Full Text
↵ Ciaraldi, T. P., L. Carter, S. Nikoulina, S. Mudaliar, D.A. McClain, R. R. Henry. 1999. Glucosamine regulation of glucose metabolism in cultured human skeletal muscle cells: divergent effects of glucose transport/phosphorylation and glycogen synthase in non-diabetic and type 2 diabetic subjects. Endocrinology 140: 3971 CrossRefMedline
↵ Miwa, I., Y. Mita, T. Murata, J. Okuda, M. Sugiura, Y. Hamada, T. Chiba. 1994. Utility of 3-O-methyl-N-acetyl-D-glucosamine, an N-acetylglucosamine kinase inhibitor, for accurate assay of glucokinase in pancreatic islets and liver. Enzyme Protein 48: 135 Medline
↵ Virkamaki, A., H. Yki-Jarvinen. 1999. Allosteric regulation of glycogen synthase and hexokinase by glucosamine-6-phosphate during glucosamine-induced insulin resistance in skeletal muscle and heart. Diabetes 48: 1101 Abstract
↵ Hinderlich, S., M. Berger, M. Schwarzkopf, K. Effertz, W. Reutter. 2000. Molecular cloning and characterization of murine and human N-acetylglucosamine kinase. Eur. J. Biochem. 267: 3301 CrossRefMedline
↵ Haltiwanger, R. S., S. Busby, K. Grove, S. Li, D. Mason, L. Medina, D. Moloney, G. Philipsberg, R. Scartozzi. 1997. O-glycosylation of nuclear and cytoplasmic proteins: regulation analogous to phosphorylation?. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 231: 237 CrossRefMedline
↵ Chou, T. Y., C. V. Dang, G. W. Hart. 1995. Glycosylation of the c-Myc transactivation domain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92: 4417 Abstract/FREE Full Text
Articles citing this article
Association Between Use of Specialty Dietary Supplements and C-Reactive Protein Concentrations
Am J Epidemiol 2012 176:1002-1013
AbstractFull TextFull Text (PDF)
Crystalline glucosamine sulfate in the management of knee osteoarthritis: efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetic properties
Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease 2012 4:167-180
AbstractFull Text (PDF)
Inhibitory Effects of Glucosamine on Endotoxin-Induced Uveitis in Lewis Rats
IOVS 2008 49:5441-5449
AbstractFull TextFull Text (PDF)
Increased protein O-GlcNAc modification inhibits inflammatory and neointimal responses to acute endoluminal arterial injury
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2008 295:H335-H342
AbstractFull TextFull Text (PDF)
Chondroprotective drugs in degenerative joint diseases
Rheumatology (Oxford) 2006 45:129-138
AbstractFull TextFull Text (PDF)
Glucosamine Sulfate Inhibits TNF-{alpha} and IFN-{gamma}-Induced Production of ICAM-1 in Human Retinal Pigment Epithelial Cells In Vitro
IOVS 2006 47:664-672
AbstractFull TextFull Text (PDF)
Glucosamine Abrogates the Acute Phase of Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis by Induction of Th2 Response
J. Immunol. 2005 175:7202-7208
AbstractFull TextFull Text (PDF)
Multiple Signals Induce Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress in Both Primary and Immortalized Chondrocytes Resulting in Loss of Differentiation, Impaired Cell Growth, and Apoptosis
J Biol Chem 2005 280:31156-31165
AbstractFull TextFull Text (PDF)
Hydrolyzed Olive Vegetation Water in Mice Has Anti-Inflammatory Activity
J. Nutr. 2005 135:1475-1479
AbstractFull TextFull Text (PDF)
Chondroprotective activity of N-acetylglucosamine in rabbits with experimental osteoarthritis
Ann Rheum Dis 2005 64:89-94
AbstractFull TextFull Text (PDF)
Integrated regulatory responses of fimB to N-acetylneuraminic (sialic) acid and GlcNAc in Escherichia coli K-12
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004 101:16322-16327
AbstractFull TextFull Text (PDF)
N-Butyryl Glucosamine Increases Matrix Gene Expression by Chondrocytes
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2004 311:610-616
AbstractFull TextFull Text (PDF)
Articular Cartilage Biology
J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2003 11:421-430
AbstractFull TextFull Text (PDF)
Immunosuppressive Effects of Glucosamine
J Biol Chem 2002 277:39343-39349
AbstractFull TextFull Text (PDF)
Cytokine Regulation of Facilitated Glucose Transport in Human Articular Chondrocytes
J. Immunol. 2001 167:7001-7008
AbstractFull TextFull Text (PDF)
  • Pointless, Timewasting x 1
  • like x 1

sponsored ad

  • Advert
Click HERE to rent this advertising spot for SUPPLEMENTS (in thread) to support LongeCity (this will replace the google ad above).

#3 fntms

  • Guest
  • 318 posts
  • 24

Posted 20 June 2015 - 07:55 AM

I have been taking NAG 2x 500mg for a few months and it seems to have helped remove most of the stubborn joint pain I had in my feet. I don't remember ever getting any relief from glucosamine...
The only other supplement I added at the same time as the NAG was 120mg gingko extract which might also help.
  • like x 1





Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: glucosamine, n acetyl glucosamine, nag, difference

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users