• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In    
  • Create Account
  LongeCity
              Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans

Photo
- - - - -

Article: People age at different rates

aging

  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

#1 mike_nyc

  • Guest
  • 46 posts
  • 7

Posted 07 July 2015 - 10:25 AM


Article:  Has science finally cracked the secret of eternal youth? Study finds some people can halt - and even REVERSE - the ageing process during their thirties 

 

http://www.dailymail...es-way-age.html

 

http://www.pnas.org/...264112.full.pdf

 

Article:
Researchers analysed medical data from almost a thousand 38-year-olds
While some appeared medically in their late 20s, some seemed almost 60
Most participants clustered around an ageing rate of one year per year, but others were found to be aging as faster
 
It seems like something from the realm of science-fiction. Some people can halt – and even reverse – the ageing process in their thirties, scientists say.
A team who measured the effects of getting older on nearly 1,000 men and women found that over a 12-year period, three of the participants had shown no deterioration.
 
They had biologically aged zero years, and had even begun to look younger. These people may hold the key to developing what would in effect be a fountain of youth, say the team from universities in Britain, the US, Israel and New Zealand. While some cheated the ageing process, however, others were found to have aged biologically by three years for each calendar year.
 
The study focused on 954 people in the New Zealand city of Dunedin who have been tracked for several years. The researchers devised a measure called ‘biological age’ to assess how worn out the participants’ bodies were internally.
 
Using their assessment, they found some of the 38-year-olds had a body age more like 60. A few were up to eight years ‘younger’ than their real age. And three had not ‘aged’ at all over the tested period.
Further tests revealed that those who seemed older on the inside also appeared older to others who were asked to guess their age. The authors wrote in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Science journal that three of the participants appeared ‘to grow physiologically younger during their thirties ... Study of such individuals may reveal molecular and behavioural pathways to rejuvenation’.
Lead researcher Dan Belsky, geriatrics professor at Duke University in the US, said: ‘Most studies of ageing look at seniors, but if we want to be able to prevent age-related disease, we’re going to have to start studying ageing in young people.’ The scientists measured the function of kidneys, lungs, the metabolic and immune systems, and dental health. They also measured telomeres – the ‘caps’ on the end of DNA strands that stop them unravelling which have been found to shorten with age.
 
This allowed them to calculate a ‘biological age’ for each participant. The biological ages ranged from under 30 to nearly 60, even though all the test subjects were 38. Those who were more advanced in biological ageing also scored worse on balance and co-ordination tests usually given to over-60s, and had more difficulty with activities such as walking upstairs.
 
The researchers say the ultimate goal is to be able to intervene in the ageing process itself, rather than addressing killers such as heart disease or cancer in isolation. Professor Belsky said: ‘As we get older, our risk grows for all kinds of different diseases. To prevent multiple diseases simultaneously, ageing itself has to be the target. Otherwise, it’s a game of whack-a-mole.’ Professor Terrie Moffitt, also of Duke University and King's College, London, said there was nothing unique about Dunedin and the pattern is likely to be repeated in similar populations elsewhere. She said that smoking and serious mental illness can speed up the ageing process, while intelligence seems to keep the body young.
This may be because a healthy brain is a sign of a healthy body, or because intelligent people have less physically demanding jobs, live in less polluted areas and take more care of their health.
The researchers also believe genes play a role – and pinning this down could lead to new anti-ageing drugs. Until then, said Professor Belsky, the best way to hold back time is to eat well and exercise.
 
 

 


  • Informative x 3
  • Disagree x 1

#2 Kalliste

  • Guest
  • 1,147 posts
  • 159

Posted 07 July 2015 - 10:51 AM

That was very interesting, heard about it on the radio. The most obvious boon would be to massively accelerate the rate of progress in aging research. What if we could administer a month of substance X and then run this test. That would be nice.

 

Also, Holy Shit people in their 30's but with the bioage of 60 :|o


  • Agree x 1

To book this BIOSCIENCE ad spot and support Longecity (this will replace the google ad above) - click HERE.

#3 DonManley

  • Guest
  • 38 posts
  • 3
  • Location:Earth
  • NO

Posted 13 July 2015 - 02:37 PM

 

Some people can halt – and even reverse – the ageing process in their thirties, scientists say.

Am I the only one who is sceptical about their conclusions? The study itself seems to be pretty comphensive, but, as expected, some conclusions the media made are a bit exhadurated. Biological age is an approximation and an aggregation of a bunch of different biomarkets and it's not a perfect measurement.

 

If some people can reverse the aging process in their thirties,why can't they reverse the aging process in their fifties? If they can reverse the aging process at any age, then why nobody looks at 100 like they do when their are in their 20s?

 

I think we can make two conclusions out of this: people age at different rates and we don't have perfect methods of measuring biological age.

 

Clearly, if we look around we notice that aging is a function of time. There are no Benjamin Buttons among us. So, if those people really became younger within a certain period it just shows that we were unable to measure something that was still aging them. Obviously, over a longer period of time those people are still biologically aging, because if we would look at their biological age at age 70 again, they would be older. In other words, something age-related is happening to them in that period of time, which is either not measured or measured imperfectly. I think that is a better conclusion that saying that some of those bodies travelled back in time.

 

To truly reverse aging we need more progress and rejuvination therapies. Otherwise, we're still in a freefall without a parashoot. Some have more terminal velocity some has less, but we all are still falling down.


  • Good Point x 2
  • Agree x 2

#4 niner

  • Guest
  • 16,276 posts
  • 2,000
  • Location:Philadelphia

Posted 13 July 2015 - 06:08 PM

 

Some people can halt – and even reverse – the ageing process in their thirties, scientists say.

 

Am I the only one who is sceptical about their conclusions?

 

Nope.  This paper got a huge amount of media hype, but I think it's kind of a load.  Their various biomarkers have more to do with health than with aging.  I think they demonstrated that some people have better diets and exercise more than others,  that some smoke and some don't, and some have sucked down enough sugar to drive themselves into T2DM.  We know that a lot of these factors can be turned around with changes in diet and exercise. 


  • Agree x 3
  • like x 1

#5 Vardarac

  • Guest
  • 178 posts
  • 36
  • Location:San Francisco, CA

Posted 14 July 2015 - 09:10 PM

Well, the good news is that the authors are open to the idea of rejuvenation.


  • Agree x 1

#6 nowayout

  • Guest
  • 2,946 posts
  • 439
  • Location:Earth

Posted 14 July 2015 - 11:12 PM

I call shenanigans.

 

They just made up an arbitrary definition of "biological age" based on a few things they happen to be able to cheaply measure, and then went and looked under the streetlight they happened to turn on.  For mercy's sake, this is the very definition of what confirmation bias is, and they unashamedly went and made a paper out of it.


  • Good Point x 1
  • Agree x 1

To book this BIOSCIENCE ad spot and support Longecity (this will replace the google ad above) - click HERE.

#7 Kalliste

  • Guest
  • 1,147 posts
  • 159

Posted 15 July 2015 - 07:31 AM

Out of all the nonsense (eg. dung beetle mating behavior) that researchers waste their time on this is pretty good. More knowledge about how to measure aging is good.





Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: aging

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users