• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In    
  • Create Account
  LongeCity
              Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans


Adverts help to support the work of this non-profit organisation. To go ad-free join as a Member.


Photo
- - - - -

A possible reason for us still dying

immortality

  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 Danail Bulgaria

  • Guest
  • 2,212 posts
  • 421
  • Location:Bulgaria

Posted 10 December 2015 - 01:26 PM


Do you think, that we are not immortal yet, because we don't develope immortality technologies to the end, and instead we constantly change one non-developed technology with another?

 

For example, from ancient times the people have believed, that all of the diseases can be healed with medicines from the nature. If this thesis has been developing firmly, without diviations, until today we should have a list of all existing plants and animals, all of their bioactive molecules, and a complete database of recepies for absolutely all diseases and aging changes, that would be searchable fast and easy. Instead, today we don't know the bioactive molecules in the majority of the plants on our planet.

 

Another example, if the mumification practice in ancient Egypth has been developed further through the years, we could have a reversible human mumification now, several thousand years later. This reversible mumification would be a far more advanced technology than the cryonics today, because it would not require liquid nitrogen supply, and would require only a heremtically sealed container for the mummy.

 

Today the development ofthe modern medicine is the most reliable solution of the treatable diseases. And instead of trying to develop it further, we try today searching of alternative scientific methodes for being immortal.

 

Do you think, that there is a logic in all of that? Or we should select only one path, take it, concentrate all of the human effort on it, and simply walk it to the end in order to become really immortal?



#2 Multivitz

  • Guest
  • 550 posts
  • -47
  • Location:UK
  • NO

Posted 28 December 2015 - 12:24 AM

Technologies come and go. The reason they go is often left to history. The ones who bring false history are often not intelligent enough to realise that lies never go unoticed. In a true heart lies never go unoticed. There are many magnificent health healing technologies that have been made hard to practice because of people having large mineral imbalances and Silica deficiencies! Doesn't mean the technologies were misunderstood by anyone. It means that the truth can be built upon by rediscovering old truths for oneself. There's no rehash, just the observable truth. This leads to important questions, and eventually to new, better answers. imo
Do we have to get told by someone 'that we are not immortal', or can we find out ourselves at a fair personal price? GMO are bad, pharmaceuticals are bad, what is the price of insane men in a society?
The Egyptian hijacked their death beliefs from another civilisation, our beliefs show patterns of information from Shamans. The Shamans have better understanding, but are forced to death by the psychopathic malnourished idiots. The Shaman's heart is large and can be filled with concern. Fear holds no value.

#3 niner

  • Guest
  • 16,276 posts
  • 2,000
  • Location:Philadelphia

Posted 28 December 2015 - 05:06 AM

 

Today the development ofthe modern medicine is the most reliable solution of the treatable diseases. And instead of trying to develop it further, we try today searching of alternative scientific methodes for being immortal.

 

Do you think, that there is a logic in all of that?

 

 

Not really.  Modern medicine and modern longevity science are both based on the same thing-- molecular biology.  It's the same technology, but with a different focus.  Medicine tries to bail water out of a leaking boat while more holes are forming all the time.  Modern longevity science is looking for ways to patch the holes and keep new ones from forming.  They are trying to do different things, but both using the same tool box.


  • Well Written x 1
  • like x 1

sponsored ad

  • Advert

#4 Danail Bulgaria

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 2,212 posts
  • 421
  • Location:Bulgaria

Posted 28 December 2015 - 07:20 AM

The modern medicine is a science, that takes its power from many sciences, not only from molecular biology. It has also, even small, some its very own development.

Some examples: The MRI and the sonography, or the ultrasound surgical technologies are not a development of the molecular biology. Pure medical development is for example the gathering of the knowledge about how the diseases progress, the symptoms of the diseases, and how are they cured. All of the surgeries for example are not molecular biology. 

 

As general, you may be right. The development of one science depends on other sciences too. Maybe it is not takiong one thing, letting it go, and taking a second thing. It can be collecting everythiong together. 

 

I still can't explain why for example we don't have a list of all existing bioactive molecules in all plants and animal species. For more than a thousand years, and many people on the Earth we could have at least that. An accessable database of all of these bioactive molecules, would lead to much faster drugs development. 



#5 Multivitz

  • Guest
  • 550 posts
  • -47
  • Location:UK
  • NO

Posted 30 December 2015 - 12:03 PM

We're in a big muddle after the news papers were used for properganda and kept being used for corporations personal manipulation of people.
The molecular theory is not correct, it lacks transmutation for a start, but that's just the tip of the iceberg. Alot of doctors practice is guess work, most are spineless enough to not admit it. You get test after test after test, then they hope you get too ill to notice you haven't been cured! Not that you were going to get better with the help of drugs. The new antibiotics are electrochemical immune boosters, if you have a deficiency in immunity then the drugs will never work. Works for some but not for others. Go to your doctor, everyother avenue has been cut short unless you know what you're doing. Some people have left thier country because it only wants to kill(prevent cure) them for one reason of another.
Immortality is self made electro magnetic thing, the ones telling you different just want your money to try something different. I wish we just had natural food, GMO is killing everything slowly. You get given ideas of health that are twisted from truth, so when you see poor health you don't bat an eyelid! When someones psychopathic you don't stop to wonder, a small ailment gets dismissed, smells covered over, etc.
Modern medicine is a joke, stumbling through test after test, no one sure of exactly what is happening. Satistical reasurance is used to market the poisons, now they compare a unique human being to a math equation lol
Why would I take anthing back that I've said here. I'm not against someone doing good, they place technical context to their work, but fail to understand the illness in the first place. This is the dilemma, I feel it is too much for a physician to cure someone. They have been taught the practice of biochemical massage, and rely on the alkali of the drip to save a life. There are good doctors out there, I hope they get the time to expand what they practice and be confident in various approaches. Like I say in my profile, you can lead a horse to water, but a pencil must be lead!





Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: immortality

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users