• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In    
  • Create Account
  LongeCity
              Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans

Photo

The strange facts about cancer

cancer

  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

#1 osris

  • Guest
  • 518 posts
  • 77

Posted 02 May 2016 - 05:16 PM


Just came across this:
 
 
 
Extract:
 
The strange facts about cancer. 
 
You either have seen those facts or you have not been paying attention. If you have known these strange facts, there would definitely be less tears and fear in your heart (and of course less trepidation in your loved ones), but just questions in your mind than just plain acceptance of the long publicized so-called facts about cancer.
 
Here are nine key facts about cancer you might have missed. Stay focussed now. 
 
FACT 1: All organic cells need energy to survive. This energy is derived mainly from simple sugars. Cancer cells metabolize sugars (just like normal human cells do) to derive energy for its own survival, but in a manner which is 'alien' to human cells because cancer cells DO NOT prefer oxygen to be involved in the process in what is called anaerobic glycolysis (which is synonymous to a fermentation process with many acidic by-products). 
 
Even though cancer cells can still perform aerobic glycolysis, the glycolysis pathway is far different from the glycolysis pathway of human cells (which is often termed as Oxygen-Phosphate pathway rather than glycolysis); and in addition the anaerobic glycolysis of sugar (even favored by anaerobic fungi) derives less bio-chemical energy. 
 
There is already research data which shows that the glycolysis activity in cancer cells is ABNORMALLY high, which means the inefficient glycolysis pathway of cancer cells DEMAND more sugar supply than human cells1. 
 
This fact about glycolysis is cancer cells (which you don't often hear) indicates that cancer cells are closely related to anaerobic microbes. All cancer cells have been shown to PREFER the use of anaerobic glycolysis2. 
 
FACT 2: Cancer cells do not survive under oxygenated environment unlike normal human cells, which means they are anaerobic. Anaerobes or microbes are averse to oxygen, and this again point to the fact that cancer cells are more akin to fungal cells3..  Is the so-called mutation undergone by human cells to become averse to oxygen just a convenient assumption.  Can human cells undergo mutation to behave like anaerobes? 
 
FACT 3: Cancer cells possess certain enzymes which are very rarely found in human cells (and even then only in specialised cells), and are in fact in concentrations which are at least hundreds of times more than in human cells, just like in fungal cells. One example is beta-glucosidase4.. 
 
FACT 4: Cancer cells develop invasive tumours, growths, or 'colonies' in a manner which is NOT typical of human cells. Even if normal human cells are said to have become mutated, FACT 1 and FACT 2 already beg serious answers as to how mutated human cells can behave more like fungal cells rather than their original nature. Furthermore, normal human cells do not invade neighbouring cellular regions, lymphatic systems, connective tissues, bore through epithelial tissues, move through inter-cellular regions, and cause metastasis. Such aggressive behaviour is analogous to the opportunisitc, parasitic, and colonisitc manner of fungal cells rather than human cells4.. Even if mutated human cells can become metastatic then let's look at FACT 5. 
 
FACT 5: Certain neoplastm develop dendritic extensions connecting metastatic colonies in a way which is akin to fungal hyhae (mycelia) or root-like extensions. There is no known evidence that human cells can develop 'root-like' extensions 6.. 
 
FACT 6: Cancer cells somehow exhibit a life of its own and are able to continuously deal with any strategy and tactics to eliminate them, even the strongest of toxic chemicals as found in chemotherapy.  The survival instincts of cancer cells are not typical of human cells but are more akin to independent microbes which have highly developed survival instincts and colonization strategies. How on earth can human cells be transformed into some 'independent', 'survivalist', 'persistent', and 'colonizing' cells which can play 'hide-and-seek' with humans7.. 
 
FACT 7: Though it has been found that cancer cells has certain part of the DNA called the tumor-suppressor gene P53 being compromised and thus seemingly explains cancer tumors as mutated cells, it actually points to an interference from an external agent to 'force' human cells to multiply. Again, it has been found that the DNA of so-called mutated human cells at the core of a cancer tumor is more akin to a fungal DNA genotype8.. 
 
FACT 8: Can human cells undergo mutation to become recalcitrant, morbid, self-destructive, fermenting neoplastic entities which at a certain stage will somehow look like eating itself up, spewing pus, blood and eructations? The grimacing terminal cancer patient will be undergoing, from hair to toe, teeth-grinding, hair-pulling, eye-popping, extremely nerve-wrecking pain which at most times, sedatives are needed to put down. The dark colorations (usually black) in dead cells at the final stages of lesions and eruptions are more indicative of some form of toxins than anything else. The symptoms of lesions and eruptions are not unlike that of untreated bites from venomous snakes, spiders, or centipedes. There is high possibilty that erythema and blackening of human cells are the work of myco-toxins and/or myco-bacterial toxins. 
 
FACT 9: It is often said that certain benign neoplasm can turn malignant due to some human interference such as during biopsies. Can a colony of human cells (neoplasm) 'go berzerk' just because a certain thin layer of its colony has been tweezed or pricked? What in the world is such a reactive response telling you? It has a 'mind' of its own and is an indepedent entity possessing a 'sense' that its survival is being interfered with or even threatened.  Is the biopsy-related malignancy a sign that the colony is not a simple mutated human cell metastatis, but a fungal response to outside interference.
 
A 'suspicion' that is not without basis.
 
The 'suspicion' of cancer cells being fungal-like or even are fungus themselves is not without basis, fundamentals, and studies. It is a beneficent suspicion because for many years, mainstream medical science has somehow being unable to 'nail' the problem and the cost of cancer therapy is mind-boggling, not to mention the billions of currencies funnelling into cancer research each year from around the world. 
 
Cancer patients can still opt for mainstream standard medical practices such as radiation, chemotherapy and/or invasive surgery; but it is without any adverse impact for these patients to hold to a suspicion that cancer tumours are actually fungal colonies for various reasons that will actually help the patient manage his/her post-medical therapy effectively, realistically, and healthily. 
 
Just as mainstream medical science cannot guarantee that cancer therapy will work 100% in a patient after exhaustive checks, analyses, measurements, diagnoses, etc., the same establishment cannot of course guarantee that the hypothesis of cancer being fungus will not work 100%. In a similar token, cancer patients cannot expect the mainstream medical science to provide all the answers 100% of the time, just as the mainstream medical science cannot expect the patients to be led to believe that mainstream medical science can provide all the answers. 
 
All being said, the public and medical science fraternity have to somehow face the reality that degenerative diseases have to be demystified with some serious re-look at the data, discoveries, statistics, etc. in a manner befitting the atmosphere of scientific objectivity and philosophy. 


#2 joelcairo

  • Guest
  • 586 posts
  • 156
  • Location:Calgary, Alberta, Canada
  • NO

Posted 08 May 2016 - 02:29 PM

The conclusion of this essay is just rubbish, probably because many of the FACTS presented are simply wrong. Cancer cells can be quite diverse in terms of energy production (and all other characteristics). Biopsies do not cause cancers to "become" malignant. And so on.



sponsored ad

  • Advert
Click HERE to rent this MEDICINES advertising spot to support LongeCity (this will replace the google ad above).

#3 LongLife

  • Guest
  • 145 posts
  • 19
  • Location:Peru

Posted 12 May 2016 - 12:36 AM

OSRIS:

These apparent observations are correct, by observation. Thirty years ago I was reading about the theory of cancer being a cause of virus(es), maybe a symbiosis of certain virus and bacteria. Hummm. I tried to imagine that but the school book learning rubbed the wrong way, so that just lied dormant in the grey matter. Then recently I can across an interview by a neurologist who worked for the Center of Disease Control and National Institute of Health and another agency before these were formed. We are talking pre WWII. Back then they found that viruses were the causual mischief in cancer formation. The interview was concerning the AIDS virus but never got around to specifically going there. Maybe the guy doing the interviewing was taken up by the flow of information he was hearing and got side tracked. It appeared to go that way. But the conversation did beat around the bush to how genetic cloning and modifications have been used since 1943. I still remember the announcement on the radio about gene splicing in the early 1970's, when it actually was performed way before that. Then AIDS popped up about 10 years after the announcement from a monkey biting someone on the ass in Africa. Bad monkey, bad! Then this and that and Ebola, etc. Fort Detrick, Maryland (MRMC). Oh, did I say that? I am so sorry.

 

Well, the interview went over several items and one is the Herpes viruses. That caught my attention as I have had "fever blister" every year when I was a kid after getting "shots" and that went on for forty years until I started into diet and supplements. Okay, the deal is that every-time one has a viral outbreak (flu, whatever, common cold, etc.) that is like a black mark on your health chalk board. Too many black marks and cancer bites you. Compromised. People are not supposed to get colds or virus outbreaks unless they genetically are compromised and the viruses are just part of the garbage removal system. They kill you so you do not continue that genetic reproduction and degrade the gene pool. They kill you either via cancer or directly making you so sick.  


  • Ill informed x 1





Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: cancer

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users