• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In    
  • Create Account
  LongeCity
              Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans

Photo
* * * * - 1 votes

Phenibut and Baclofen cross addictive?

phenibut baclofen nerve pain pain chronic pain lyme herniated disc nootropic

  • Please log in to reply
10 replies to this topic

#1 jcalderaio

  • Guest
  • 29 posts
  • 3
  • Location:Long Beach CA

Posted 29 June 2016 - 06:56 PM


I take phenibut about 3 times a week (have been for over a year) and have never had any issues with addiction/dependence. I use phenibut, however, not recreationally but for severe nerve pain from Lyme's disease. I also have a prescription for baclofen that I take a few times per week on the days I don't take Phenibut. I haven't had any issues with cross addiction yet, but theoretically, if I take baclofen on the days I do not take phenibut, would it be almost just like taking it everyday and become addicted to GABA-B meds in general? I also take Valium staggered throughout the week (every couple days). In addition, I take 600 mg Lyrica daily. I know its a lot of GABAergic meds, but my nerve pain is out of this world.



#2 Junk Master

  • Guest
  • 1,032 posts
  • 88
  • Location:United States

Posted 30 June 2016 - 11:53 PM

Everyone is different, however I do know baclofen removes any phenibut withdrawals for me.   Have you tried abstaining from both for a period of more than a week?  Or is that possible with your nerve pain?

 

Frankly, with your nerve pain, as long as you don't find yourself developing an increasing tolerance, I wouldn't be too concerned about addiction, if I were you.  Sounds like what you are taking is improving your life and you are not chasing a "high."



sponsored ad

  • Advert
Click HERE to rent this advertising spot for BRAIN HEALTH to support LongeCity (this will replace the google ad above).

#3 jcalderaio

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 29 posts
  • 3
  • Location:Long Beach CA

Posted 01 July 2016 - 09:23 PM

 Have you tried abstaining from both for a period of more than a week?

 

 

Junk Master, 

 

Yes, I do take breaks from baclofen, phenibut, and valium sometimes as a wash out period and to test and make sure I am not addicted to anything. After about 3 days, however, the pain gets so bad that my thoughts turn to suicide, so I am driven back to taking one of them. I even took Phenibut 5 days straight (the longest in a row I have ever taken it) and I'm currently on my 5th day without it (even though I am on Valium currently) and I have no Phenibut withdrawal effects. I did have some anxiety the day after stopping, but nothing some baclofen can't cure. 

 

In addition to these meds, I am taking Suboxone, Amitriptyline, Chlorzoxazone, Guanfacine, and Metoprolol (for autonomic issues). Along with Lymes I have POTS, polyneuropathy, occipital neuralgia, and much more. If it weren't for all these meds, I would have already committed suicide. The pain I'm in is unbearable, but I still have hope that one day I may be cured. My ONLY issue is that I don't want to do any long term brain damage. I was quite highly intelligent before I took the meds, but they take a toll on my long term memory. I know most of it is only temporary, but I'd hate to be doing any long term damage. I guess right now the most important thing is to keep me comfortable to prevent the suicidal thoughts. What good is a smart brain if I'm dead?



#4 PeopleProgrammer

  • Guest
  • 25 posts
  • 13
  • Location:Atlanta, Georgia, USA

Posted 02 July 2016 - 03:54 AM

The two are cross addictive. both have affinity for the GABA-B receptor. the only difference between them is a chlorine atom attached to the aromatic ring of baclofen, compared to the lack thereof on the aromatic ring of phenibut. 



#5 Oracle Laboratories

  • Guest
  • 35 posts
  • 28
  • Location:Worldwide

Posted 10 July 2016 - 11:05 PM

I am not sure exactly what you are asking.  Do you mean are Phenibut and Baclofen's pharmacological mechanism(s)-of-action cross-tolerant with each other, or are you asking if one will substitute for the other and suppress the withdrawal syndrome of the other?  The answer is yes to both, notably due to two distinct mechanism(s)-of-ation shared between both compounds.
 
First, the primary mechanism-of-action that causes withdrawal; syndrome upon abrupt cessation are Phenibut and Baclofen's affinity for and agonist action at, metabotropic GABA -B Receptors.  The second primary mechanism-of-action (on the one that you are probably seeking), is that both compounds exert an inhibitory action as "gabapentinoids" at a2o-subunit-containing Voltage-Gated Ca+ channel sites throughout the Central-Nervous-System and Peripheral-Nervous-System.  (Although Baclofen to a MUCH lesser extent).  Of course, the same is also true of Pregabalin (Lyrica) in its a2o-subunit-containing Voltage-Gated Calcium Channel site inhibitor properties, and although Pregablin does not possess any direct affinity for GABA Receptors, it can be categorized as a GABA-production catalyst. 
 
All of the typical Gabapentinoid compounds consist of the GABA carbon backbone, with various additions of functional groups that either make the molecule lipophillic enough to permeate the Blood-Brain-Barrier, or alter the compound's overall binding affinity for a specific target site within a given neuronal system in the brain.   GABA does not cross the Blood-Brain-Barrier on it's own, so in the case of Phenibut and Baclofen, it is the addition of the cyclic phenyl ring that carries the compound across the Blood-Brain-Barrier, and is also the group that makes the molecule(s) highly selective for the GABA -B Receptor subtype (over GABA -A subtypes).  Also, echoing PeopleProgrammer's comments, the only variation between Phenibut and Baclofen is the additional of a single chloride atom on the para position on the cyclic, aromatic phenyl ring of Baclofen.  This tiny chemical modification alters of pharmacology and pharmacokinetics of Baclofen compared to Phenibut in two primary ways: *one being that the addition of this single chloride atom significantly protects the Baclofen molecule from the extensive first-pass metabolism in the gut and the gastrointestinal tract that Phenibut is subjected to (almost completely being destroyed via first-pass metabolism), making average doses of Phenibut 1000mg to 1500mg, and average doses of Baclofen around 20mg.  Secondly, the addition of that simple halogen group (the single chloride atom on Baclofen) seems to diminish almost all of Baclofen's selectivity for Voltage-Gated Ca+ channels, making Baclofen a pure, selective, and competitive GABA -B Receptor agonist, while Phenibut displays both GABA -B Receptor affinity as well as an inhibitory action at a2o-subunit-containing Voltage-Gated calcium channels which helps to combat neuropathic pain like other classical examples of gabapentinoid compounds, including Pregabalin (Lyrica) and Gabapentin (Neurontin).
 
​Now, the two "classical" examples of the GABApentinoids Gabapentin (Neurontin) and Pregabalin (Lyrica) both act on a2o-subunit-containing Voltage-Gated calcium channels with an inhibitory action, which decreases the frequency that nerves along these channels fire, and also limit how long these channels stay open during neuronal firing - thereby decreasing neuropathic pain.  Now, although Gabapentin and Pregabalin do not possess any GABA Receptor affinity themselves, they do affect the mechanisms of  of glutamate decarboxylase and aminotransferase (two enzymes that are responsible for the biosynthesis of GABA from glutamate).  They also affect  the neuronal density of the GABA transporter molecules and increase the functional rate of GABA transport from the synaptic space to pre-synaptic neurons (and vise-versa), thereby aplifying the action of GABA to some degree.
 
There was a thread not long ago regarding the interchangeability and substitution of Phenibut and Baclofen for anxiety disorders, where a poster asked me about general gabapentinoid pharmacology.  The following information is a quote from that post:

 

 

Gabapentin (common brand name Neurontin) - Of course, this is the prototype of this class of compounds, that was first identified as having an inhibitory effect on a2o-subunit-containing Voltage-Dependent Ca+ channel neuro-transmission in certain neurons in the brain.  This inhibitory action on Voltage-Gated Calcium Channels calms the action of certain neuronal channels, and although Gabapentin has no direct binding affinity for GABA -A or GABA -B Receptors directly, in some ways it can be characterizes as a GABA modulator and/or GABA-productionn catalyst.  Chemically, Gabapentin is the neurotransmitter GABA (Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid) with the addition of a cyclic cyclohexyl ring to the GABA backbone. Pharmacologically, this appears to nullify any affinity for either the ionotropic GABA -A Receptors or the metabotropic GABA -B Receptors.  Instead, it possesses a novel mechanism-of-action that defines the gabapentinoid class of compounds - that is that it acts selectively as an inhibitor of a2o-subunit-containing Voltage-Gated Ca+ Channels in various types of neurons throughout various brain structures. (As well as within a2o Ca+ channels within nerve fibers in the spinal cord and Peripheral-Nervous-System, as well). It is this action that makes Gabapentin suitable for the treatment of certain types of neuropathic pain disorders.

Although in some circles, Gabapentin is used for the treatment of some anxiety disorders, its only real prevalent use in psychiatry (in my personal experience, using it alongside psychiatrists) is its use off-label as a mood-stabilizer (similar to the way that Lithium is used) even though its precise mechanism-of-action is distinct from that of traditional mood-stabilizing drugs.  The action by which Gabapentin exerts its mild mood-stabilizing effects is likely via the same mechanism that it effects anxiety disorders - in that Gabapentin modulates the action of glutamate decarboxylase and aminotransferase (two enzymes that are responsible for the biosynthesis of GABA).

Pregabalin (common brand name Lyrica) - A close structural analogue of Gabapentin, and another structural derivative of the endogenous neurotransmitter GABA (Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid).  Chemically, Pregabalin is also composed of the chemical backbone of GABA, with the addition of an isobutyl group (in place of the cyclohexyl group on the Gabapentin molecule), making it roughly 2.5x as potent at a2o-subunit Voltage-Gated Calcium Channel sites than Gabapentin itself.  Because of it's stronger inhibitory action at these sites, as well as its more prominent action on increasing GABA biosynthesis (via glutamate decarboxylase and aminotransferase) as well as increasing the synaptic density of the GABA transporter molecules and increasing the functional rate of GABA transport from synaptic space to pre-synaptic neurons (and vise-versa), it has been declared as a drug of potential abuse and federally scheduled as a Schedule V Drug by the US Drug Enforcement Administration.  Because of its more pronounced action on GABA biosythesis, GABA reuptake (via affecting the GABA transporter), and its increased inhibitory action on a2o-subunit Ca+ Channels, it has been proven to be considerably more effective than Gabapentin in several clinical trials evaluating its effectiveness for the treatment of anxiety disorders such as Generalized Anxiety Disorder. (Although this use is generally accompanied by the use of a Tricyclic Antidepressant or Selective-Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI)).  A recent clinical evaluation by Bandelow et al. (2007) comparing the long-term effectiveness of Pregabalin against traditional anxiolytic agents such as various benzodiazepines and drugs such as venlafaxine, concluded that Pregabalin may be as effective at treating Generalized Anxiety Disorder as these drugs are, while remaining more effective long-term compared to several benzodiazepine drugs, due to the rapid development of tolerance to benzodiazepine drugs in many subjects.  Now, these findings are encouraging at first glance, but have yet to be replicated (or displayed on a large-scale study population), and in my professional opinion - although potentially beneficial for the treatment of Generalized Anxiety Disorder with the co-administration of a serotonergic agent such as a Tricyclic Antidepressant or Selective-Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI), I do not feel that Pregabalin provides enough GABAergic activity to truly be effective at treating severe anxiety disorders, or psychophysical anxiety disorders, such as Panic Attack Disorder.

Phenibut - Although originally believed to function solely as a selective and competitive metabotropic GABA -B Receptor agonist, recent studies have revealed that in addition to Phenibut's affinity for GABA -B Receptors, it too, like Gabapentin and Pregabalin, acts as a selective a2o-subunit Voltage-Gated-Calcium Channel site inhibitor. Now, as stated in this thread, I do feel that Phenibut is over-used by many in the nootropic/"research chemical" sector online, but I do absolutely feel that it has therapeutic value as an anxiolytic drug, and I have even developed structural relatives and novel compounds based upon its structure for the treatment of anxiety disorders.  Phenibut exerts its anxioltyic action via three primary mechanisms-of-action - Firstly, because of its selective and competitive agonism of metabotropic GABA -B Receptors - Second, because of its gabapentinoid inhibitory action at a2o-subunit-containing Voltage-Gated Ca+ Channel neuro-transmission - And third, because of its action as a TAAR1 (Trace Amine-Associated Receptor 1) antagonist, which effectively antagonizes the endogenous substance B-phenethylamine. (Which is the prototype backbone structure for drugs such as amphetamine, some substituted cathinones, and some other substituted phenthylamines, which can induce anxiety).  Chemically, Phenibut is also a derivative of GABA (Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid) and consists of the GABA backbone, with the addition of a cyclic phenyl ring, which allows the GABA molecule to be lipophillic (fat-soluble) enough to permeate the Blood-Brain-Barrier - and also makes it competitively selective for the GABA -B Receptor over the GABA -A subtype, also providing the molecule with a binding affinity for the TAAR1 Receptor. (Which GABA itself does not).

Gabapentin, Pregabalin, and Phenibut are all close structural relatives, and are all chemical derivatives of GABA (Gama-Aminobutyric Acid), the differences being the addition of a cyclohexyl group on the GABA chain in the case of Gabapentin, the substitution of that cyclohexyl group for an isobutyl group in the case of Pregabalin, and the substitution of that isobutyl group with a cyclic phenyl ring in the case of Phenibut.

Baclofen - Despite having some measurable affinity for the same a2o-subunit Voltage-Gated Calcium Channel sites that the other gabapentinoid compounds listed here do, the actual affinity of Baclofen for these sites is so minute, that I consider it medically insignificant in regards to Baclofen's overall pharmacological mechanism-of-action.  Chemically, Baclofen is the exact same molecule as Phenibut (the GABA molecule with the addition of the cyclic phenyl ring) - with the only difference being the addition of a single chloride atom on the para position of the phenyl ring of Phenibut.  This very slight chemical difference has a surprisingly dramatic effect on Baclofen's overall pharmacological mechanism-of-action.  The addition of the chloride atom on Baclofen's phenyl ring dramatically shields it from the extensive first-pass metabolism in the stomach the Phenibut is subject to. (Typical doses of Phenibut are around 1000mg, whereas typical Baclofen doses are around 20mg).  The addition of the chloride atom on Baclofen's phenyl ring does not affect its selectivity for the metabotropic GABA -B Receptor, as Baclofen retains similar binding affinity and action as an agonist at GABA -B Receptor subtypes.  However, the addition of the chloride atom on Baclofen's phenyl ring does appear to significantly diminish its affinity for the a2o-subunit Voltage-Gated Ca+ Channel sites that the other gabapentinoid compounds mentioned here possess.  Additionally, the addition of the chloride atom on the phenyl ring of Baclofen appears to block all affinity for the TAAR1 (Trace Amine-Associated Receptor 1), for which Phenibut displays noteworthy affinity for, and for which Baclofen does not.  So, despite having some measurable affinity for a20-subunit Voltage-Gated Calcium Channel sites like the other gabapentinoids mentioned above, its actual action at these sites is so minute that Baclofen's only real medically noteworthy mechanism-of-action is as a highly selective and competitive metabotropic GABA -B Receptor agonist.

 

If you are using Baclofen, Phenibut, and Pregabalin together and are still not getting relief from neuropathic pain, then you are probably exhausting the therapeutic potential of the gabapnetinoid class of drugs, and may need to use a milf-moderate strength, centrally-acting opioid painkiller, such as Tramadol or hydrocodone.  In all honesty, the Phenibut is probably a better choice than the Baclofen, since the slight addition of that single chloride atom on the Baclofen molecule nullifies almost all of Baclofen's affinity for and action at, Voltage-Gated Ca+ channels that Phenibut (lacking this halo0gen group) still retains.  Don't get me wrong, the Baclofen may still help some, by exerting it's skeletal smooth-muscle relaxant effect as a consequence of metabotropic GABA -B Receptor binding.  However, the GABA -A agonist skeletal smooth-muscle-relaxant drug that just recently became a scheduled drug in many countries (namely, Carisoprodol (or name brand "Soma" in several countries)) is a much better choice for much people, and exerts much more of a notable effect compared to Baclofen.  However, one must remember, that like many other GABA -A Receptor agonists (particularly some of the older drug classes) these drugs often do impair overall cognition and can be habit-forming.  Your physician will have to weigh the side effects of taking a centrally-acting opioid painkiller or a GABA agonist muscle relaxant drug alongside the Pregabalin that you are already taking.
 

 

 


-John Gona

Oracle Laboratories
NeuroPsych Institute



#6 Oracle Laboratories

  • Guest
  • 35 posts
  • 28
  • Location:Worldwide

Posted 12 July 2016 - 02:35 PM

Oops.. I somehow made a double-post.  I though the original post didn't go through, and so I re-typed my reply, and now cannot delete the original post. Sorry for the confusion.

I’m not entirely sure what you’re asking.  Are you asking if cross-tolerance develops to the effects of Phenibut and Baclofen, or if they substitute for each other during withdrawal syndrome?  The answer is yes for both, to some extent..
 
Phenibut, like Baclofen, functions as a highly selective and competitive agonist of the GABA -B Receptor, although Phenibut also possesses the additional action of being a “gabapentinoid” - meaning that it acts at a2o-subunit-containing Voltage-Gated Ca+ (calcium) channels, where it exerts an inhibitory action.  Although Baclofen does display some affinity for these a2o Ca+ Channel sites, it’s overall action at these sites is so minute that it is a medically irrelevant action - making Baclofen a pure, selective, and competitive GABA -B Receptor agonist, whereas Phenibut exerts this action, yet also acts at the a2o-subunit Voltage-Gated Ca+ channel sites.
 
As PeopleProgrammer mentioned, the classical “gabapentinoid” compounds are all based on the GABA carbon backbone, simply with various functional group substitutions that either make them lipophillic enough to permeate the Blood-Brain-Barrier, or give them an inherent affinity for a particular target binding site.  GABA is produced in the brain and does not cross the Blood-Brain-Barrier on it’s own, so orally-administered GABA is completely destroyed via first-pass metabolism in the stomach.  In the case of Phenibut and Baclofen, it is the addition of the cyclic aromatic phenyl ring that makes the overall molecule lipophillic (fat soluble) enough, and carries the GABA molecule across the Blood-Brain-Barrier where it is actually active, centrally.  It is also the addition of this cyclic phenyl ring that makes Phenibut and Baclofen highly selective for the GABA -B Receptor over the GABA -A subtype.  However, there is one slight addition of a halogen group (in this case, a chlorine atom) on the para position of the phenyl ring of Baclofen, that Phenibut lacks.  This group alters the pharmacology and pharmacokinetic metabolism of Baclofen in two ways.  Firstly, the addition of that single chlorine significantly protects the Baclofen molecule from the extreme first-pass metabolism that Phenibut is subjected to in the gut and the gastrointestinal tract (destroying the vast majority of the orally-administered dose) - which is why typical oral doses of Phenibut are around 1000mg to 2000mg, and typical oral doses of Baclofen are 10mg to 20mg.  It is also the addition of this chlorine atom that nullifies almost all of Baclofen’s affinity for Voltage-Gated Ca+ (calcium) Channels that other gabapentinoids (including Phenibut, Gabapentin, and Pregabalin possess). - This makes Phenibut both a GABA -B agonist as well as a “gabapnetinoid”, whereas Baclofen is more appropriately categorized as a purely selective GABA -B agonist.  So yes, Phenibut and Baclofen possess cross-tolerance as GABA -B Receptor agonists, and will substitute for each other in this regard, but not in Phenibut’s gabapentinoid action at Voltage-Gated Ca+ Channels, which Baclofen lacks.  
 
(There is another research compound currently circulating known as F-Phenibut or Fluorophenibut, which functions along the same lines as Baclofen - and consists of the GABA molecule with a cyclic phenyl ring (Phenibut), with the addition of a halogen group at the para-position of the phenyl ring (in this case a fluorine group in the place of Baclofen’s chlorine group)). 
 
 
Now, in the case of the other “gabapentinoid” compounds (such as Gabapentin (Neurontin) and Pregnable (Lyrica)) that exert action against neuropathic pain via their inhibitory action at a2o-subunit-containing Voltage-Gated Ca+ Channel sites, that do not have any direct affinity for GABA Receptors, most of them still have some GABAergic effect in enhancing the action of GABA, by increasing the metabolic pathways of glutamate decarboxylase and aminotransferase (two enzymes responsible for the biosynthesis of GABA from Glutamate), as well as increasing the neuronal density of GABA transporter molecules, which can affect pre-synaptic reuptake of GABA that is released into the synaptic cleft.
 
 
So, in short, yes - Phenibut will fully substitute for Baclofen withdrawal syndrome plus some (with it’s additional effect as a Voltage-Gated Ca+ Channel site inhibtor), however Baclofen will only partially substitute for Phenibut during withdrawal syndrome (at least the GABA -B Receptor agonism, but lacking the Ca+ Channel inhibition of Phenibut).  Also, yes, to some degree over time, the GABA -B agonism will develop some cross-tolerance, as repeated use of either GABA -B Receptor agonist will eventually cause some down-regulation of GABA -B Receptors.  However, if the drugs are alternated in cycles like you describe, this will probably slow the development of this cross-tolerance for a while.
 
We had poster ask me to provide some general information, comparing and contrasting several of the more well-known gabapentinoid compounds in a thread asking about Baclofen vs. Phenibut for anxiety, and that information is probably pertinent here, also:
 

 

 

Gabapentin (common brand name Neurontin) - Of course, this is the prototype of this class of compounds, that was first identified as having an inhibitory effect on a2o-subunit-containing Voltage-Dependent Ca+ channel neuro-transmission in certain neurons in the brain.  This inhibitory action on Voltage-Gated Calcium Channels calms the action of certain neuronal channels, and although Gabapentin has no direct binding affinity for GABA -A or GABA -B Receptors directly, in some ways it can be characterizes as a GABA modulator and/or GABA-productionn catalyst.  Chemically, Gabapentin is the neurotransmitter GABA (Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid) with the addition of a cyclic cyclohexyl ring to the GABA backbone. Pharmacologically, this appears to nullify any affinity for either the ionotropic GABA -A Receptors or the metabotropic GABA -B Receptors.  Instead, it possesses a novel mechanism-of-action that defines the gabapentinoid class of compounds - that is that it acts selectively as an inhibitor of a2o-subunit-containing Voltage-Gated Ca+ Channels in various types of neurons throughout various brain structures. (As well as within a2o Ca+ channels within nerve fibers in the spinal cord and Peripheral-Nervous-System, as well). It is this action that makes Gabapentin suitable for the treatment of certain types of neuropathic pain disorders.

Although in some circles, Gabapentin is used for the treatment of some anxiety disorders, its only real prevalent use in psychiatry (in my personal experience, using it alongside psychiatrists) is its use off-label as a mood-stabilizer (similar to the way that Lithium is used) even though its precise mechanism-of-action is distinct from that of traditional mood-stabilizing drugs.  The action by which Gabapentin exerts its mild mood-stabilizing effects is likely via the same mechanism that it effects anxiety disorders - in that Gabapentin modulates the action of glutamate decarboxylase and aminotransferase (two enzymes that are responsible for the biosynthesis of GABA).

Pregabalin (common brand name Lyrica) - A close structural analogue of Gabapentin, and another structural derivative of the endogenous neurotransmitter GABA (Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid).  Chemically, Pregabalin is also composed of the chemical backbone of GABA, with the addition of an isobutyl group (in place of the cyclohexyl group on the Gabapentin molecule), making it roughly 2.5x as potent at a2o-subunit Voltage-Gated Calcium Channel sites than Gabapentin itself.  Because of it's stronger inhibitory action at these sites, as well as its more prominent action on increasing GABA biosynthesis (via glutamate decarboxylase and aminotransferase) as well as increasing the synaptic density of the GABA transporter molecules and increasing the functional rate of GABA transport from synaptic space to pre-synaptic neurons (and vise-versa), it has been declared as a drug of potential abuse and federally scheduled as a Schedule V Drug by the US Drug Enforcement Administration.  Because of its more pronounced action on GABA biosythesis, GABA reuptake (via affecting the GABA transporter), and its increased inhibitory action on a2o-subunit Ca+ Channels, it has been proven to be considerably more effective than Gabapentin in several clinical trials evaluating its effectiveness for the treatment of anxiety disorders such as Generalized Anxiety Disorder. (Although this use is generally accompanied by the use of a Tricyclic Antidepressant or Selective-Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI)).  A recent clinical evaluation by Bandelow et al. (2007) comparing the long-term effectiveness of Pregabalin against traditional anxiolytic agents such as various benzodiazepines and drugs such as venlafaxine, concluded that Pregabalin may be as effective at treating Generalized Anxiety Disorder as these drugs are, while remaining more effective long-term compared to several benzodiazepine drugs, due to the rapid development of tolerance to benzodiazepine drugs in many subjects.  Now, these findings are encouraging at first glance, but have yet to be replicated (or displayed on a large-scale study population), and in my professional opinion - although potentially beneficial for the treatment of Generalized Anxiety Disorder with the co-administration of a serotonergic agent such as a Tricyclic Antidepressant or Selective-Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI), I do not feel that Pregabalin provides enough GABAergic activity to truly be effective at treating severe anxiety disorders, or psychophysical anxiety disorders, such as Panic Attack Disorder.

Phenibut - Although originally believed to function solely as a selective and competitive metabotropic GABA -B Receptor agonist, recent studies have revealed that in addition to Phenibut's affinity for GABA -B Receptors, it too, like Gabapentin and Pregabalin, acts as a selective a2o-subunit Voltage-Gated-Calcium Channel site inhibitor. Now, as stated in this thread, I do feel that Phenibut is over-used by many in the nootropic/"research chemical" sector online, but I do absolutely feel that it has therapeutic value as an anxiolytic drug, and I have even developed structural relatives and novel compounds based upon its structure for the treatment of anxiety disorders.  Phenibut exerts its anxioltyic action via three primary mechanisms-of-action - Firstly, because of its selective and competitive agonism of metabotropic GABA -B Receptors - Second, because of its gabapentinoid inhibitory action at a2o-subunit-containing Voltage-Gated Ca+ Channel neuro-transmission - And third, because of its action as a TAAR1 (Trace Amine-Associated Receptor 1) antagonist, which effectively antagonizes the endogenous substance B-phenethylamine. (Which is the prototype backbone structure for drugs such as amphetamine, some substituted cathinones, and some other substituted phenthylamines, which can induce anxiety).  Chemically, Phenibut is also a derivative of GABA (Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid) and consists of the GABA backbone, with the addition of a cyclic phenyl ring, which allows the GABA molecule to be lipophillic (fat-soluble) enough to permeate the Blood-Brain-Barrier - and also makes it competitively selective for the GABA -B Receptor over the GABA -A subtype, also providing the molecule with a binding affinity for the TAAR1 Receptor. (Which GABA itself does not).

Gabapentin, Pregabalin, and Phenibut are all close structural relatives, and are all chemical derivatives of GABA (Gama-Aminobutyric Acid), the differences being the addition of a cyclohexyl group on the GABA chain in the case of Gabapentin, the substitution of that cyclohexyl group for an isobutyl group in the case of Pregabalin, and the substitution of that isobutyl group with a cyclic phenyl ring in the case of Phenibut.

Baclofen - Despite having some measurable affinity for the same a2o-subunit Voltage-Gated Calcium Channel sites that the other gabapentinoid compounds listed here do, the actual affinity of Baclofen for these sites is so minute, that I consider it medically insignificant in regards to Baclofen's overall pharmacological mechanism-of-action.  Chemically, Baclofen is the exact same molecule as Phenibut (the GABA molecule with the addition of the cyclic phenyl ring) - with the only difference being the addition of a single chloride atom on the para position of the phenyl ring of Phenibut.  This very slight chemical difference has a surprisingly dramatic effect on Baclofen's overall pharmacological mechanism-of-action.  The addition of the chloride atom on Baclofen's phenyl ring dramatically shields it from the extensive first-pass metabolism in the stomach the Phenibut is subject to. (Typical doses of Phenibut are around 1000mg, whereas typical Baclofen doses are around 20mg).  The addition of the chloride atom on Baclofen's phenyl ring does not affect its selectivity for the metabotropic GABA -B Receptor, as Baclofen retains similar binding affinity and action as an agonist at GABA -B Receptor subtypes.  However, the addition of the chloride atom on Baclofen's phenyl ring does appear to significantly diminish its affinity for the a2o-subunit Voltage-Gated Ca+ Channel sites that the other gabapentinoid compounds mentioned here possess.  Additionally, the addition of the chloride atom on the phenyl ring of Baclofen appears to block all affinity for the TAAR1 (Trace Amine-Associated Receptor 1), for which Phenibut displays noteworthy affinity for, and for which Baclofen does not.  So, despite having some measurable affinity for a20-subunit Voltage-Gated Calcium Channel sites like the other gabapentinoids mentioned above, its actual action at these sites is so minute that Baclofen's only real medically noteworthy mechanism-of-action is as a highly selective and competitive metabotropic GABA -B Receptor agonist.

 

 
If you are using two or more of these drugs at once and are still not experiencing relief, you may be exhausting the therapeutic potential of this drug class, and may need to look into a ce ntrally-acting pain medication, such as an opioid painkiller.  (Starting with something mild, such as Tramadol or hydroquinone, perhaps).  As mentioned previously, Baclofen will work to relax skeletal smooth muscle tissue (like Phenibut, also), but has almost no medically-significant action on Voltage-Gated Calcium Channel sites like Phenibut does.  With herniated disks, it can sometimes be difficult to determine if the pain you are experiencing is nerve pain, skeletal pain, or muscle pain.  Whereas the gabapentinoid drugs that were covered in this thread will help to address nerve pain, and a centrally-acting opioid painkiller will address skeletal and muscle pain, one GABA -A Receptor agonist muscle-relaxant drug comes to mind.. namely, Carisoprodol (Soma), which was only recently scheduled in a lot of countries, but experienced fairly widespread use for years without being a controlled substance.  It is a MUCH more effective skeletal muscle relaxant than Baclofen, and may offer you some relief.  However, just as always, consult with your physician before combining multiple sedative drugs that affect overall cognition.
 
 
 
 
 
-John Gona
Psychopharmacologist
Psychotropic Treatment Specialist
 
Oracle Laboratories
NeuroPsych Institute

Edited by Oracle Laboratories, 12 July 2016 - 02:42 PM.


#7 jcalderaio

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 29 posts
  • 3
  • Location:Long Beach CA

Posted 12 July 2016 - 07:30 PM

 

I am not sure exactly what you are asking.  Do you mean are Phenibut and Baclofen's pharmacological mechanism(s)-of-action cross-tolerant with each other, or are you asking if one will substitute for the other and suppress the withdrawal syndrome of the other?  The answer is yes to both, notably due to two distinct mechanism(s)-of-ation shared between both compounds.
 
First, the primary mechanism-of-action that causes withdrawal; syndrome upon abrupt cessation are Phenibut and Baclofen's affinity for and agonist action at, metabotropic GABA -B Receptors.  The second primary mechanism-of-action (on the one that you are probably seeking), is that both compounds exert an inhibitory action as "gabapentinoids" at a2o-subunit-containing Voltage-Gated Ca+ channel sites throughout the Central-Nervous-System and Peripheral-Nervous-System.  (Although Baclofen to a MUCH lesser extent).  Of course, the same is also true of Pregabalin (Lyrica) in its a2o-subunit-containing Voltage-Gated Calcium Channel site inhibitor properties, and although Pregablin does not possess any direct affinity for GABA Receptors, it can be categorized as a GABA-production catalyst. 
 
All of the typical Gabapentinoid compounds consist of the GABA carbon backbone, with various additions of functional groups that either make the molecule lipophillic enough to permeate the Blood-Brain-Barrier, or alter the compound's overall binding affinity for a specific target site within a given neuronal system in the brain.   GABA does not cross the Blood-Brain-Barrier on it's own, so in the case of Phenibut and Baclofen, it is the addition of the cyclic phenyl ring that carries the compound across the Blood-Brain-Barrier, and is also the group that makes the molecule(s) highly selective for the GABA -B Receptor subtype (over GABA -A subtypes).  Also, echoing PeopleProgrammer's comments, the only variation between Phenibut and Baclofen is the additional of a single chloride atom on the para position on the cyclic, aromatic phenyl ring of Baclofen.  This tiny chemical modification alters of pharmacology and pharmacokinetics of Baclofen compared to Phenibut in two primary ways: *one being that the addition of this single chloride atom significantly protects the Baclofen molecule from the extensive first-pass metabolism in the gut and the gastrointestinal tract that Phenibut is subjected to (almost completely being destroyed via first-pass metabolism), making average doses of Phenibut 1000mg to 1500mg, and average doses of Baclofen around 20mg.  Secondly, the addition of that simple halogen group (the single chloride atom on Baclofen) seems to diminish almost all of Baclofen's selectivity for Voltage-Gated Ca+ channels, making Baclofen a pure, selective, and competitive GABA -B Receptor agonist, while Phenibut displays both GABA -B Receptor affinity as well as an inhibitory action at a2o-subunit-containing Voltage-Gated calcium channels which helps to combat neuropathic pain like other classical examples of gabapentinoid compounds, including Pregabalin (Lyrica) and Gabapentin (Neurontin).
 
​Now, the two "classical" examples of the GABApentinoids Gabapentin (Neurontin) and Pregabalin (Lyrica) both act on a2o-subunit-containing Voltage-Gated calcium channels with an inhibitory action, which decreases the frequency that nerves along these channels fire, and also limit how long these channels stay open during neuronal firing - thereby decreasing neuropathic pain.  Now, although Gabapentin and Pregabalin do not possess any GABA Receptor affinity themselves, they do affect the mechanisms of  of glutamate decarboxylase and aminotransferase (two enzymes that are responsible for the biosynthesis of GABA from glutamate).  They also affect  the neuronal density of the GABA transporter molecules and increase the functional rate of GABA transport from the synaptic space to pre-synaptic neurons (and vise-versa), thereby aplifying the action of GABA to some degree.
 
There was a thread not long ago regarding the interchangeability and substitution of Phenibut and Baclofen for anxiety disorders, where a poster asked me about general gabapentinoid pharmacology.  The following information is a quote from that post:

 

 

Gabapentin (common brand name Neurontin) - Of course, this is the prototype of this class of compounds, that was first identified as having an inhibitory effect on a2o-subunit-containing Voltage-Dependent Ca+ channel neuro-transmission in certain neurons in the brain.  This inhibitory action on Voltage-Gated Calcium Channels calms the action of certain neuronal channels, and although Gabapentin has no direct binding affinity for GABA -A or GABA -B Receptors directly, in some ways it can be characterizes as a GABA modulator and/or GABA-productionn catalyst.  Chemically, Gabapentin is the neurotransmitter GABA (Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid) with the addition of a cyclic cyclohexyl ring to the GABA backbone. Pharmacologically, this appears to nullify any affinity for either the ionotropic GABA -A Receptors or the metabotropic GABA -B Receptors.  Instead, it possesses a novel mechanism-of-action that defines the gabapentinoid class of compounds - that is that it acts selectively as an inhibitor of a2o-subunit-containing Voltage-Gated Ca+ Channels in various types of neurons throughout various brain structures. (As well as within a2o Ca+ channels within nerve fibers in the spinal cord and Peripheral-Nervous-System, as well). It is this action that makes Gabapentin suitable for the treatment of certain types of neuropathic pain disorders.

Although in some circles, Gabapentin is used for the treatment of some anxiety disorders, its only real prevalent use in psychiatry (in my personal experience, using it alongside psychiatrists) is its use off-label as a mood-stabilizer (similar to the way that Lithium is used) even though its precise mechanism-of-action is distinct from that of traditional mood-stabilizing drugs.  The action by which Gabapentin exerts its mild mood-stabilizing effects is likely via the same mechanism that it effects anxiety disorders - in that Gabapentin modulates the action of glutamate decarboxylase and aminotransferase (two enzymes that are responsible for the biosynthesis of GABA).

Pregabalin (common brand name Lyrica) - A close structural analogue of Gabapentin, and another structural derivative of the endogenous neurotransmitter GABA (Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid).  Chemically, Pregabalin is also composed of the chemical backbone of GABA, with the addition of an isobutyl group (in place of the cyclohexyl group on the Gabapentin molecule), making it roughly 2.5x as potent at a2o-subunit Voltage-Gated Calcium Channel sites than Gabapentin itself.  Because of it's stronger inhibitory action at these sites, as well as its more prominent action on increasing GABA biosynthesis (via glutamate decarboxylase and aminotransferase) as well as increasing the synaptic density of the GABA transporter molecules and increasing the functional rate of GABA transport from synaptic space to pre-synaptic neurons (and vise-versa), it has been declared as a drug of potential abuse and federally scheduled as a Schedule V Drug by the US Drug Enforcement Administration.  Because of its more pronounced action on GABA biosythesis, GABA reuptake (via affecting the GABA transporter), and its increased inhibitory action on a2o-subunit Ca+ Channels, it has been proven to be considerably more effective than Gabapentin in several clinical trials evaluating its effectiveness for the treatment of anxiety disorders such as Generalized Anxiety Disorder. (Although this use is generally accompanied by the use of a Tricyclic Antidepressant or Selective-Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI)).  A recent clinical evaluation by Bandelow et al. (2007) comparing the long-term effectiveness of Pregabalin against traditional anxiolytic agents such as various benzodiazepines and drugs such as venlafaxine, concluded that Pregabalin may be as effective at treating Generalized Anxiety Disorder as these drugs are, while remaining more effective long-term compared to several benzodiazepine drugs, due to the rapid development of tolerance to benzodiazepine drugs in many subjects.  Now, these findings are encouraging at first glance, but have yet to be replicated (or displayed on a large-scale study population), and in my professional opinion - although potentially beneficial for the treatment of Generalized Anxiety Disorder with the co-administration of a serotonergic agent such as a Tricyclic Antidepressant or Selective-Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI), I do not feel that Pregabalin provides enough GABAergic activity to truly be effective at treating severe anxiety disorders, or psychophysical anxiety disorders, such as Panic Attack Disorder.

Phenibut - Although originally believed to function solely as a selective and competitive metabotropic GABA -B Receptor agonist, recent studies have revealed that in addition to Phenibut's affinity for GABA -B Receptors, it too, like Gabapentin and Pregabalin, acts as a selective a2o-subunit Voltage-Gated-Calcium Channel site inhibitor. Now, as stated in this thread, I do feel that Phenibut is over-used by many in the nootropic/"research chemical" sector online, but I do absolutely feel that it has therapeutic value as an anxiolytic drug, and I have even developed structural relatives and novel compounds based upon its structure for the treatment of anxiety disorders.  Phenibut exerts its anxioltyic action via three primary mechanisms-of-action - Firstly, because of its selective and competitive agonism of metabotropic GABA -B Receptors - Second, because of its gabapentinoid inhibitory action at a2o-subunit-containing Voltage-Gated Ca+ Channel neuro-transmission - And third, because of its action as a TAAR1 (Trace Amine-Associated Receptor 1) antagonist, which effectively antagonizes the endogenous substance B-phenethylamine. (Which is the prototype backbone structure for drugs such as amphetamine, some substituted cathinones, and some other substituted phenthylamines, which can induce anxiety).  Chemically, Phenibut is also a derivative of GABA (Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid) and consists of the GABA backbone, with the addition of a cyclic phenyl ring, which allows the GABA molecule to be lipophillic (fat-soluble) enough to permeate the Blood-Brain-Barrier - and also makes it competitively selective for the GABA -B Receptor over the GABA -A subtype, also providing the molecule with a binding affinity for the TAAR1 Receptor. (Which GABA itself does not).

Gabapentin, Pregabalin, and Phenibut are all close structural relatives, and are all chemical derivatives of GABA (Gama-Aminobutyric Acid), the differences being the addition of a cyclohexyl group on the GABA chain in the case of Gabapentin, the substitution of that cyclohexyl group for an isobutyl group in the case of Pregabalin, and the substitution of that isobutyl group with a cyclic phenyl ring in the case of Phenibut.

Baclofen - Despite having some measurable affinity for the same a2o-subunit Voltage-Gated Calcium Channel sites that the other gabapentinoid compounds listed here do, the actual affinity of Baclofen for these sites is so minute, that I consider it medically insignificant in regards to Baclofen's overall pharmacological mechanism-of-action.  Chemically, Baclofen is the exact same molecule as Phenibut (the GABA molecule with the addition of the cyclic phenyl ring) - with the only difference being the addition of a single chloride atom on the para position of the phenyl ring of Phenibut.  This very slight chemical difference has a surprisingly dramatic effect on Baclofen's overall pharmacological mechanism-of-action.  The addition of the chloride atom on Baclofen's phenyl ring dramatically shields it from the extensive first-pass metabolism in the stomach the Phenibut is subject to. (Typical doses of Phenibut are around 1000mg, whereas typical Baclofen doses are around 20mg).  The addition of the chloride atom on Baclofen's phenyl ring does not affect its selectivity for the metabotropic GABA -B Receptor, as Baclofen retains similar binding affinity and action as an agonist at GABA -B Receptor subtypes.  However, the addition of the chloride atom on Baclofen's phenyl ring does appear to significantly diminish its affinity for the a2o-subunit Voltage-Gated Ca+ Channel sites that the other gabapentinoid compounds mentioned here possess.  Additionally, the addition of the chloride atom on the phenyl ring of Baclofen appears to block all affinity for the TAAR1 (Trace Amine-Associated Receptor 1), for which Phenibut displays noteworthy affinity for, and for which Baclofen does not.  So, despite having some measurable affinity for a20-subunit Voltage-Gated Calcium Channel sites like the other gabapentinoids mentioned above, its actual action at these sites is so minute that Baclofen's only real medically noteworthy mechanism-of-action is as a highly selective and competitive metabotropic GABA -B Receptor agonist.

 

If you are using Baclofen, Phenibut, and Pregabalin together and are still not getting relief from neuropathic pain, then you are probably exhausting the therapeutic potential of the gabapnetinoid class of drugs, and may need to use a milf-moderate strength, centrally-acting opioid painkiller, such as Tramadol or hydrocodone.  In all honesty, the Phenibut is probably a better choice than the Baclofen, since the slight addition of that single chloride atom on the Baclofen molecule nullifies almost all of Baclofen's affinity for and action at, Voltage-Gated Ca+ channels that Phenibut (lacking this halo0gen group) still retains.  Don't get me wrong, the Baclofen may still help some, by exerting it's skeletal smooth-muscle relaxant effect as a consequence of metabotropic GABA -B Receptor binding.  However, the GABA -A agonist skeletal smooth-muscle-relaxant drug that just recently became a scheduled drug in many countries (namely, Carisoprodol (or name brand "Soma" in several countries)) is a much better choice for much people, and exerts much more of a notable effect compared to Baclofen.  However, one must remember, that like many other GABA -A Receptor agonists (particularly some of the older drug classes) these drugs often do impair overall cognition and can be habit-forming.  Your physician will have to weigh the side effects of taking a centrally-acting opioid painkiller or a GABA agonist muscle relaxant drug alongside the Pregabalin that you are already taking.
 

 

 

-John Gona

Oracle Laboratories
NeuroPsych Institute

 

 

I appreciate your very informative, well written reply. Baclofen only helps minimally and the only reason I took it at all, on days I did not take phenibut, was to cycle them. However, now that I know they are cross addictive, I will most likely take Phenibut every day at 2 g for the next 6 months as it helps my pain and I need to finish college. I will deal with withdrawing when I get there.

 

I am already on an opiod - Suboxone. However, it is not working very well for the amount of pain I am in. I want to be on something stronger, methadone would probably be a good choice. The amount of pain I am in from Lyme's in unspeakable and unbearable - I would do almost anything to be out of it.



#8 LizWizard

  • Guest
  • 2 posts
  • 2
  • Location:Canada

Posted 17 July 2016 - 07:01 PM

Hey Oracle Labaratories, I have a related question that is not worth starting a new thread for. I would appreciate the contribution of your expertise!

My question is regarding the buildup of tolerance to Baclofen. I've heard in many places that while tolerance develops to its psychological relaxing effects, tolerance to its anti-spasmodic properties doesn't happen (or happens much slower). What might the reason/mechanism be for this? Does this apply to its muscle relaxation properties too?

Thanks in advance

#9 Oracle Laboratories

  • Guest
  • 35 posts
  • 28
  • Location:Worldwide

Posted 20 July 2016 - 06:57 PM

jcalderaio,
 
Very sorry to hear about your condition.   Most users on forums like this are concerned about the Phenibut/Baclofen question for nootropic purposes concerning anxiety, in which case cycling may help some (since Baclofen lacks much activity as a Voltage-Gated Calcium Channel blocker, like Phenibut), however, since Phenibut provides both Voltaged-Gated Ca+ Channel Inhibition as well as Baclofen's GABA -B Receptor affinity (which is responsible for the muscle relaxant effect), Phenibut may do more for pain relief because of it's wider pharmacological action.  However, I would suggest using what you have been using in the combination that seems to work best for you.
 
It can often be hard to pinpoint exactly the source of the pain related to Lyme's Disease since neuronal damage occurs to the nerve endings (similar to traumatic nerve damage and conditions like Fibromyalgia) which causes pain on the nerve level, but Lyme's Disease also unfortunately causes local inflamation which mimics conditions like gout and arthritis, and the drugs to treat these to types of pain are usually different. (While using an anti-inflammatory to deal with local inflammation and a "gabapentinoid" (like Phenibut) to deal with neuropathic pain).  Now, I cannot give you direct medical advice since I am not your physician, and cannot say for sure what "side of this coin" is causing your pain specifically. (And, even your physician likely cannot tell definitively, either).
 
If you’re really bad off, one thought that I have is to continue to Baclofen for its GABA -B agonist muscle-relaxant effect, but to add a drug like one of the “gabapentinoids” that I mentioned in my last post - a drug like Pregabalin or Gabapentin (brand names Lyrica and Neurontin in the US).  Gabapentin is really not particularly habit-forming, and is rather benign, but can be effective at combating neuropathic pain.  Pregabalin is exceptionally effective at combating neuropathic pain, but can be slightly habit-forming and sedating at high doses, at least initially.  By taking both Baclofen and a drug like Gabapentin of Pregabalin you would be getting the GABA -B Receptor agonism AND the Voltage-Gated Ca+ Channel inhibition of Phenibut, so the combination would essentially have the same pharmacological action as Phenibut, but would likely however have a much more pronounced effect on pain relief.  Then, of course, you could always use something like over-the-counter ibuprofen or naproxen for inflammation, as needed when the pain really acts up.  
 
Just a thought that came to mind that you may want to approach your doctor about, if you’re really having a hard time dealing with the pain.
 
And yes, Buprenorphine (the active opioid agonist in Suboxone) is a fantastic drug for recovering opioid-dependent individuals, and it has some great antidepressant properties, however it only acts as a partial agonist at the mu-opioid receptors unlike drugs like morphine or oxycodone, which act as full agonists, since Buprenorphine was never really intended to treat pain.  It was designed to stimulate the mu-Opioid Receptors just enough to stave off withdrawals, but not enough to cause the euphoric “high” that opioid addicts seek.  In my opinion, it is a far superior drug to treat opioid dependency than Methadone.  However, Methadone (being a full mu-Opioid Receptor agonist) is certainly more effective at treating pain, and was designed to do so, being developed by the Germans due to an opium shortage during the World Wars.
 
Just curious, is there are reason that you have avoided taking a low-dose traditional opioid such as low dose hydrocodone or oxycodone?  Do you have a history of opioid dependency, or are you simply trying to avoid becoming dependent on such a full-agonist opioid drug?  If you are worried about dependency, the synthetic opioid Tramadol is pretty benign, and in all honesty, despite having a much lower binding affinity for mu-Opioid Receptors, it does act as a mild full agonist, and may help your pain more than Buprenorphine (Suboxone).
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
-John Gona
 
Oracle Laboratories
NeuroPsych Institute


#10 Oracle Laboratories

  • Guest
  • 35 posts
  • 28
  • Location:Worldwide

Posted 20 July 2016 - 07:05 PM

Oops..  I completely missed that you're already taking Lyrica.  Sorry.  I re-read your additional post.



sponsored ad

  • Advert
Click HERE to rent this advertising spot for BRAIN HEALTH to support LongeCity (this will replace the google ad above).

#11 Oracle Laboratories

  • Guest
  • 35 posts
  • 28
  • Location:Worldwide

Posted 20 July 2016 - 08:07 PM

LizWizard,
 
There is a bit a debate surrounding the issue of your question - as to why tolerance to one aspect of a drug develops, yet tolerance to another of its pharmacological mechanisms-of-action may not occur, and this does take place with a number of different drugs.
 
Phenibut, for example, an extremely close structural relative of Baclofen - Baclofen differing from Phenibut only by the addition of a single chloride atom attached to the para position of the cyclic phenyl ring of Baclofen.  
 
When people start using Phenibut, they often notice a general mood-lift and marked antidepressant effect.  This is caused by Phenibut’s effect on pre-synaptic dopamine release, while Phenibut’s GABA -B Receptor agonism and it’s Voltage-Gated Ca+ Calcium channel inhibition are responsible for its anti-anxiety effects.
 
After taking Phenibut regularly for some time, most people notice the “feel good” effect of Phenibut start to fade, as the dopamine receptors that are stimulated by the dopamine that is released due to Phenibut administration become down-regulated. (Developing tolerance).  However, in most cases, based on other studies, and several clinical trials that I and my team have conducted on drugs that are derivatives of Phenibut or that act as pro-drugs to Phenibut (meaning that they produce Phenibut as an active metabolite) tolerance to the anxiolytic effects does not develop near to the same degree, or nearly as quickly as the dopaminergic effects that are responsible for the initial “feel good” mood-lift that patients experience when they first start taking Phenibut.  This is simply because dopamine receptors down-regulate quickly.  (Which is the main reason that recreational drugs that increase dopamine levels build tolerance quickly).
 
Down-regulation of a receptor type can occur in two ways.  Physical down-regulation occurs when receptors “tree off“ or “split off“, requiring more of the neurotransmitters of agonist in question to agonize the receptor(s) sufficiently to produce the desired amount of neuronal activity.  Functional down-regulation occurs when the ion channel of a receptor is desensitized, requiring more of, or a stronger strength agonist to agonize that receptor enough to generate enough neuronal activity along that channel.
 
Now, neuronal systems in the brain are all interlinked, and all indirectly influence each other, so down-regulation to specific neuronal receptor types in the brain (within the Blood-Brain-Barrier) occurs to a much greater degree, and much more quickly, than outside of the Blood-Brain-Barrier in the Peripheral-Nervous-System and the Sympathetic-Nervous-System.  (Just Google “biochemical pathways” and look at the giant, wall-sized posters of all of the direct and indirect feedback mechanisms of the brain).
 
Now, I am not completely sure that I agree with the posts that you have read, suggesting that once the CNS effects subside, the muscle-relaxant and anti-spasmodic effects are entirely sustained, indefinitely  I agree that the psychological sedative effects likely subside long before the full therapeutic effects are exhausted.  If I had to speculate, I would assume that this is because the GABA -B Receptors in the Central-Nervous-System within the brain are being down-regulated at a much faster rate as those outside of the Blood-Brain-Barrier in the Peripheral-Nervous-System at the spinal and supraspinal sites that the Baclofen is binding to, outside of the brain to illicit its relaxant effect of smooth muscle tissue within those supraspinal channels, and that the GABA -B Receptors that Baclofen binds to within the brain (particularly the Parietal Lobe) are simply functionally-down-regulating at a faster rate.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
-John Gona
 
Oracle Laboratories
NeuroPsych Institute
 






Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: phenibut, baclofen, nerve pain, pain, chronic pain, lyme, herniated disc, nootropic

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users