• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In    
  • Create Account
  LongeCity
              Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans


Adverts help to support the work of this non-profit organisation. To go ad-free join as a Member.


Photo
- - - - -

What's the point of immortality in a sick world?

immortality

  • Please log in to reply
10 replies to this topic

#1 tfor

  • Guest
  • 202 posts
  • 19
  • Location:Earth

Posted 14 July 2016 - 10:36 PM


I don't know about you, but I am becoming more disgusted of this planet on a daily basis.

 

How likely is it that everything which we see now will sooner or later resolve and then there will be peace on earth and everything will be just fine?

 

I think this is never going to happen. Retards blinded by their perverted religion will probably still be blowing up people 500 years from now.

 

Why should this ever come to an end?

 

When I think about how life was 20 years from now and how life is now then it's already hard to bear. Sure, in the past there were also threats and

 

rumors of wars but terrorism hasn't been on such a level where a bomb can basically go up in a mall,supermarket,stadium,school at any second now.

 

It's really disgusting.

 

And terrorism is only one of the threats. What about GMO and environmental toxins? Imo the planet is also becoming more hostile to human life.

 

 

Long story short, I really ask myself does immortality (if it could be achieved) make sense if you can't escape this shit hole at the same time?

 

Immortality would only make sense if you could escape to another planet at the same time where you could live in peace.  This might work

 

for the super rich people but not for the ordinary person.

 

 

What's your take on this?

 

Do people who strive for immortality generally have a positive outlook and assume that conflicts will all be solved in the future?

 

Or think about this: Imagine they finally have the technology to freeze people and then terrorists come and blow the facilities up and thousands of

 

frozen people die without noticing it.

 

 

And you should also ask yourself if they really get the technology one day then who'd be interested in granting every human being access to longecity

 

or immortality? Already now they're saying that the planet is overcrowded. Now imagine what happens if people stop dying. This will only result in even more

 

wars.


  • unsure x 2
  • Dangerous, Irresponsible x 1

#2 Clifford Greenblatt

  • Member
  • 355 posts
  • 4
  • Location:Owings Mills, MD

Posted 23 July 2016 - 09:48 PM

I think immortalists are seeking to build a society with conditions that are safe and highly favourable to immortalists, even if contrary societies continue to exist. Worldview is crucial to your concern about the condition of the world. In a naturalistic worldview, immortalists would hope to gain sufficient power, through radically advanced technology, to obtain full protection from threats from contrary societies. In a biblical worldview, the source of hope is not in any society of this world, but in freedom from the corruption of the present world through a new creation brought about by the Creator of all that is.


  • Informative x 1

#3 Danail Bulgaria

  • Guest
  • 2,213 posts
  • 421
  • Location:Bulgaria

Posted 26 July 2016 - 04:58 PM

What's the point of immortality in a sick world?

 

to heal the sick world? or make it the paradise on earth?

 

 


  • Cheerful x 1

sponsored ad

  • Advert

#4 A941

  • Guest
  • 1,027 posts
  • 51
  • Location:Austria

Posted 27 July 2016 - 10:22 PM

The point is to make a world worth living in.

Of course we see the horrors, not of evil, but stupidity, everywhere, but we have to get rid of them, to create a better wordl, or 3,4 Billion Years of evolution have been wasted.



#5 corb

  • Guest
  • 507 posts
  • 213
  • Location:Bulgaria

Posted 28 July 2016 - 03:05 PM

Regional crime, terrorism and wars are ugly. But they only kill thousands of people.
Car crashes kill a million people every year.
And aging kills tens of millions every year.

 

So to me it's clear which one we should be focused on.

 

It's not really optimism and I don't even consider myself an immortalist, I'm just concerned with the biggest problem - and as most times in human history it's the one the majority prefers to ignore. If there was a world war raging I'd be a bit more concerned but as things are right now, not really.

 

www.fightaging.org has some articles on overpopulation on his blog if you're interested. Also please bare in mind people had wars when they were a mere few million spread out on all continents. Anything could be a reason for a war, never denounce a humanist idea on that ground, it's silly. It's like saying we shouldn't feed and help the poor because they'll spread disease - prominent fascists used to say that.



#6 jroseland

  • Guest
  • 1,117 posts
  • 162
  • Location:Europe

Posted 02 August 2016 - 08:48 AM

I met an old childhood friend in Prague recently. He was traveling Europe with his beautiful & classy girlfriend.
 
One on one over a succulent meal and couple glasses of wine on a resplendent sunny patio he mentioned that he had saved $12,000 to take his girlfriend on this epic European vacation. My friend is to put it lightly, killing it.
In the past 10 years he's literally starred death in the face a number of times, fought back, won and has parlayed his remarkable survivor story into a pretty successful speaking career. Knowing him so long, I can really see how he's refined his raw talent for communication and likable personality into a highly profitable skill set.
He also operates a pretty successful marketing firm serving clients like Uber, the Denver Nuggets and Make a Wish.
He has a pretty good immediate family (who I know well) and an enviable social circle.
His most recent toy is a $1500 remote control drone.
We talked about meditation, supplementation, coaching and the great books we devote time to reading. He's really been taking his personal development seriously for a while and it's obviously paying off.
 
The discussion turned to legacy; how we hoped to leave the world better than we found it. We discussed the merits of doing so by...
Building bigger businesses
Hiring more
Writing books
Inventing awesome supplements or new technology
Starting none-profits or doing more altruistic work
And of course by simply making more money
I then suggest something he didn't really expect; that he should procreate. I shared the sentiment that even though technology has enabled us wield influence in all these amazing ways to change the world, one of the most powerful ways to change the world is to create life and really invest heavily in raising children.
 
My friend gave me a couple of BS excuses why procreation wasn't on his RADAR...
He likes living with his current roommate in a cool downtown neighborhood
His girlfriend is in an uncertain place in her career
He likes to spend his time on his cool hobbies like rock climbing and traveling
He's got a couple of big, demanding projects ahead of him
Which I didn't buy. I pushed him a little more on the issue...
If what you've told me about your girlfriend is true and she doesn't have some deep, dark secret that would prevent her from being a good wife or mother, then what are you waiting for?
He finally got more honest...
The world is so fucked. So fucked! Climate change. Terrorism. The government taking away our rights. Overpopulation. Technological unemployment. We are so lucky to live at this extraordinary period of history were we have peak freedom, comfort and happiness but it's not going to be like that for long. Shit is going to change. I wouldn't want to bring life into the world that's coming.
 
I pushed back, trying to strike a balance between frankness and diplomatically pace-leading him out the intellectual maze of nihilism that he was in.  
Yeah I can see what you're saying. Sometimes I feel the same when I watch too much of the news aka reality disaster porn, it just seems like the whole world is a train wreck happening in very slow motion.
But you should really read this author Steven Kotler, he's a none-fiction science writer and he writes these books about scientific advancements in really crucial domains; nuclear fission, environmentalism, gene editing, anti-aging, etc - really remarkable stuff!
It doesn't make it into your newsfeed as much but smart people are making tremendous progress on all the global issues you mentioned. The truth is we actually have an excellent reason to be optimistic about the future; throughout history these demons drank cups so full of human blood...
Small pox
Spanish flu
Chattel slavery
Fascism and communism
Large scale religious wars
Infant mortality
Smart people figured out how to fix these problems. In the last 75 years smart people figured out how to set up our world so we didn't have any more world wars that kill off tens of millions of people. Smart people figured out how to end the nuclear stand off between the USA and the USSR that could have ended our species.
We live pretty good lives in this world built by smart people don't we? To paraphrase the comedian Joe Rogan: If I sent you off into the woods in the middle of nowhere with just the clothes on your back and a hatchet how long would it be before you could send me an email?
Your paranoia about creating life that has to live in a world not as good as this one is a self fulfilling prophesy. You've seen the first 10 minutes of Idiocracy. The real problem is not overpopulation, climate change or terrorism, these things can be fixed. The real problem is the cultural and state sponsored eugenic program that encourages the wrong people to breed like rabbits the right people to wait and wait and wait some more before making babies.
Smart people have an obligation to reproduce. Smart individual humans have a tremendous exponential power to fix big problems ailing humanity.
Look man you got a really good life, don't you?
You have this good life largely because your parents (who are pretty smart people right?) choose the inconvenient option of having you! They choose to invest their time in being good parents not... playing with drones and rock climbing! If you think you could be at least as good a parent as your parents you've got a hell of an obligation to reproduce!
My friend then, of course threw my own logic back at me.
OK so what about you then? You certainly seem to be having a lot of fun traveling the world; video blogging, learning languages, salsa dancing and throwing coconuts on the ground. Why aren't you reproducing?
I had the dubiously better excuse of not having found as qualified a partner as he had.
 
I'm obviously quiet passionate about topic because this is, perhaps the idealogical challenge of our era. If the jaded pop culture and the media ever pushing it's reality disaster porn continue to convince smart people to not reproduce our society will descend into a very unfunny Idiocracy.
 
Smart people like me (and you?) living these masturbatory lives pursuing shallow hedonism instead of making love to virtuous partners and becoming excellent, committed parents will be the death of our species. The species needs us to do it like they do it on the Discovery Channel.
 
This brings me to a sobering interview I listened to of Mike Adam the Health Ranger; they discuss shoddy chances of survival our society and species face if we don't manage to fundamentally Biohack ourselves and our world.
The survival of our species desperately needs Biohacking, it needs us to invent new technologies and break ground on science that unlocks blazing light of human potential. It also really needs us to make babies.

 

 


#7 pamojja

  • Guest
  • 2,840 posts
  • 721
  • Location:Austria

Posted 02 August 2016 - 11:20 AM

Regional crime, terrorism and wars are ugly. But they only kill thousands of people.
Car crashes kill a million people every year.
And aging kills tens of millions every year.

 

Here are the total deaths of 2014. Be aware of the limitations of such numbers, depending on twisted reporting from health authorities. A recent study found preventable deaths from medical malpractice isn't even reported, but would probably take rank 3.

Cause of Death wld    Rnk    Deaths   7,256,490,011

Coronary Heart Disease    1    7,356,061
Stroke    2    6,670,934
Lung Disease    3    3,104,330
Influenza and Pneumonia    4    3,051,988
Lung Cancers    5    1,599,557
HIV/AIDS    6    1,533,760
Diarrhoeal diseases    7    1,497,724
Diabetes Mellitus    8    1,497,371
Road Traffic Accidents    9    1,254,526
Hypertension    10    1,141,205
Low Birth Weight    11    1,134,954
Liver Disease    12    1,020,891
Tuberculosis    13    934,879
Other Injuries    14    932,484
Kidney Disease    15    864,226
Suicide    16    803,900
Birth Trauma    17    743,908
Liver Cancer    18    740,373
Stomach Cancer    19    733,499
Colon-Rectum Cancers    20    723,913
Alzheimers/Dementia    21    700,834
Falls    22    693,131
Malaria    23    618,248
Congenital Anomalies    24    556,327
Breast Cancer    25    536,521
Violence    26    504,587
Inflammatory/Heart    27    472,290
Malnutrition    28    456,508
Endocrine Disorders    29    410,518
Oesophagus Cancer    30    405,803
Meningitis    31    395,230
Asthma    32    386,318
Drownings    33    372,442
Rheumatic Heart Disease    34    337,335
Pancreas Cancer    35    331,918
Prostate Cancer    36    321,728
Lymphomas    37    312,302
Oral Cancer    38    298,027
Maternal Conditions    39    296,002
Leukemia    40    276,097
Fires    41    267,889
Cervical Cancer    42    264,225
Peptic Ulcer Disease    43    262,911
Epilepsy    44    204,825
Poisonings    45    193,460
Other Neoplasms    46    193,025
Bladder Cancer    47    172,813
Ovary Cancer    48    151,039
Hepatitis B    49    149,164
Measles    50    130,461
War    51    119,463
Parkinson's Disease    52    119,282
Skin Disease    53    111,178
Alcohol    54    107,261
Skin Cancers    55    94,973
Drug Use    56    93,255
Anemia    57    90,160
Syphilis    58    78,911
Uterin Cancer    59    78,670
Encephalitis    60    77,869
Pertussis    61    67,059
Tetanus    62    66,129
Rheumatoid Arthritis    63    66,008
Leishmaniasis    64    48,404
Appendicitis    65    39,551
Hepatitis C    66    38,914
Dengue    67    28,755
Schistosomiasis    68    21,797
Schizophrenia    69    21,102
Multiple Sclerosis    70    19,051
Trypanosomiasis    71    17,971
Chagas disease    72    7,806
Leprosy    73    7,790
Upper Respiratory    74    6,038
Prostatic Hypertrophy    75    5,870
Depression    76    4,320
Osteoarthritis    77    4,149
Ascariasis    78    3,302
Iodine Deficiency    79    3,246
Otitis Media    80    2,810
Diphtheria    81    2,615
Oral conditions    82    1,570
Chlamydia    83    1,076
Vitamin A Deficiency    84    121
Hookworm Disease    85    2
Trichuriasis    86    0

Leaving aside medical malpractice, and considering deaths in a somewhat restricted sense of accidents, unintentional or not:

 

Road Traffic Accidents    9    1,254,526

Other Injuries    14    932,484

Suicide    16    803,900

Falls    22    693,131

Violence    26    504,587

Drownings    33    372,442

Fires    41    267,889

Poisonings    45    193,460

War    51    119,463

Alcohol    54    107,261

Drug Use    56    93,255
 

Deaths from international terrorism compared with road crash deaths in OECD countries.

RESULTS:

In the 29 OECD countries for which comparable data were available, the annual average death rate from road injury was approximately 390 times that from international terrorism. The ratio of annual road to international terrorism deaths (averaged over 10 years) was lowest for the United States at 142 times. In 2001, road crash deaths in the US were equal to those from a September 11 attack every 26 days.

CONCLUSIONS:

There is a large difference in the magnitude of these two causes of deaths from injury. Policy makers need to be aware of this when allocating resources to preventing these two avoidable causes of mortality.

 

Would place terrorism with 3,217 yearly deaths at rank 80 after iodine deficiency.

 

The cumulative death toll is still 100% since times immortal. Human and other sentient being have experienced unmeasurable sufferings and joys during all this time, and it will continue this way.

 

But honing in at the presently apparent mass-hysteria about something such minute as terrorism - compared to much, much unsurmountable obstacles for humans surviving as a race - does indicate we're primed for an Orwellian state in the next decade. Also that wont last, only that's for sure.



#8 pamojja

  • Guest
  • 2,840 posts
  • 721
  • Location:Austria

Posted 02 August 2016 - 12:34 PM

And how, arbitrary to the actual facts, media nowadays has so much power over the majority to create such a hysteria:
 
we-terrorism-upd2016-7.png

http://www.datagrave...urope-1970-2015


Edited by pamojja, 02 August 2016 - 12:35 PM.


#9 corb

  • Guest
  • 507 posts
  • 213
  • Location:Bulgaria

Posted 02 August 2016 - 03:01 PM

The cumulative death toll is still 100%

 

If it wasn't we wouldn't have much need for this website.

The death toll will always be 100% given a long enough time period, even if we do not age.
Let's start by increasing healthy lifespans and work up from there and see where the leads us.
 

The mass media induced hysteria is more worrisome than the problems they're talking about, that's true.

Oh and I forgot to add - it's not just terrorism - resources, overpopulation, nuclear power, etc.
Opinion giving "news" programs make sure to spin anything closer to doom and gloom as they can, it's what keeps their mediocre jobs safe.


Edited by corb, 02 August 2016 - 03:12 PM.


#10 RGCheek

  • Guest
  • 20 posts
  • 3
  • Location:United States
  • NO

Posted 23 August 2016 - 03:44 PM

I hate to sound like a troll here, as I am not doing that, but I think the Evolutionary perspective is one of survival alone.

 

So the question is "Which human beings will survive?" Well, the weeds will survive, and then the wealthy oligarchs will breed the weeds into whatever kind of human being they want, or the weeds will have to survive in spite of the Oligarchs if they Oligarchs decide that they prefer Terminator style robots or human simulants instead of people. But the long term picture of that latter situation has the Weedlings breeding like cockroaches until they have the numbers to overwhelm the enclaves of Oligarchs when we have a Rhine Freezing Event similar to the winter of 406.

 

In the end the Weedlings always win, no matter how fine the artistic tastes, or how high the IQs of those they replace.

 

Humanity will survive, but just not maybe in the form we all prefer.



#11 LarryFeltonJo

  • Guest
  • 10 posts
  • 4
  • Location:Atlanta, GA

Posted 13 September 2016 - 11:59 PM

 

The cumulative death toll is still 100%

 

If it wasn't we wouldn't have much need for this website.

The death toll will always be 100% given a long enough time period, even if we do not age.
Let's start by increasing healthy lifespans and work up from there and see where the leads us.
 

The mass media induced hysteria is more worrisome than the problems they're talking about, that's true.

Oh and I forgot to add - it's not just terrorism - resources, overpopulation, nuclear power, etc.
Opinion giving "news" programs make sure to spin anything closer to doom and gloom as they can, it's what keeps their mediocre jobs safe.

 

 

Yep. As bad as things seem today you can choose any time period and determine that the world was a truly fucked-up place then.  For instance, I think the world was much more in danger of swift and imminent destruction in 1960 than it is now.  Assuming the world does last another century, I'd like to be here to see what it looks like, even if it's not some sort of crisis-free utopia.







Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: immortality

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users