I agree there needs to be a permanent post here. Human beings as we all know make irrational decisions, we are programmed to make them, the tantalising prospect of slowing down or reversing the aging process is likely to exacerbate that trait, we cannot simply wash our hands and argue it is down to the individual to ensure they carry out the full and proper research and discern correctly, when they may not either possess the temporary, inherent or potential capacity to do so - if indeed any of us can: it is a tough trade-off. Even so, the prospective downside of getting it wrong, of failing in these duties of diligence, is not proportional to the perceived crime: where as a community we can help to inform we are obligated to do so.
I feel there should be a post summarising the considerable anecdotal experiences with humans and pets; the now 5 experiments (Baati, Agevivo, Ichor x 3) involving mice and c60oo; theories of action and very importantly the way forward. If say it is proposed that in 18 months time it is anticipated a product will be developed which will be robust, non toxic, without the formation of epoxides which at this stage appear to be the root of the risks, this would I believe enable more informed judgement and perhaps forestall newbies from diving in. And perhaps a suggestion of a steer towards other less risky supplements or activities to delay aging. This might appear condescending to some, but it is a broad church here.