@able you still don't understand what I mean. The mechanism of high NMN with low NAD+ being neurotoxic is something that is observed in chemotherapy but can also occur in other circumstances. So when you take NMN sublingual are you at risk to selectively create the same circumstances as observed in cells undergoing chemotherapy? The Sinclair study show a very rapid absorption and spiking of NMN levels.
Let me ask it differently would you recommend sublingual NMN in the case described here:
https://www.longecit...n-degeneration/
If you think the answer is yes then post a link that has analyzed the expression of SLC12a8 in the eye tissues. Would I recommend sublingual NR? No I would not but I see the risk factors there lower as the NRK path is slightly more indirect. Oral NR capsules would be the safest as that is the most natural path.
As for you offending / calling out / challenging my motivations (and no I don't have 500k shares) is that also your MoO in real life when you don't like something? Let me at least clarify this. My INCOME is not related in anyway to the supplement industry. Yours? You have a stock portfolio? Because then you know that shares you buy and sell at the press of a button, most people that invested in the time I did have a nice profit if they sell today. There are plenty of investment opportunities and when a stocks potential leaks out you move on. Chromadex from an investment perspective is a very high risk investment, the success of the company is entirely related to a successful go to market campaign that reaches a broad global audience. Something that you will not find on this board.
Edited by stefan_001, 13 April 2019 - 08:20 AM.