(Quote Science and religion are not opposed in any way to each other.
Yes they are. Science is based on empirical evidence, while religion is based on hearsay. Science is guided by logical rules which are clearly defined, while religion is not.)
Science is a method designed to test the physical, whatever that is. History is not simply hearsay and there are lots of real issues not physical to give one example, math. What is logic if things must be only physical? I wont repeat myself, except to say science and religion are not opposed.
(Quote Are YOU alive when you are frozen? What is the motive to revive you? In what way are you special enough to revive?
These are good questions. I hope to get a good amount of money saved, because I assume that when people are going to think about reviving me they will ask - "can this person support himself in today's world?" and "who will pay taxes etc on this?", and I intend to have the money saved to use as motive for my revival.
I suppose you are not alive when frozen because all chemical processes are stopped close to absolute zero. It doesn't mean you are dead either. You are paused.)
And this is scientific?
(Quote If the deterministic resurrection works out, it does not matter when will it work out, because you may calculate infinitely in the forwards, and infinitely in the backwards direction. So everything, that has ever lived on that planet will be calculated from the beginning of life to the moment when the dterministic resurrection will be possible. So if once it happens, it may also work for me.
This is likely never going to be possible. The reason is limited memory and limited computational power. At best let's say that the solar system is approximately a closed system where nothing from the outside will impact life here on Earth. Unless time travel to the past is made possible, you will have to at the very least make a copy of the solar system and move it backwards in time. Normally you need more than one atom to simulate one atom so you'd probably need much more material to simulate it on any type of computer. The computational power would also have to be immense.
Also, quantum mechanics doesn't allow to calculate what happened before from my understanding, because you have probabilities and not exact trajectories for particles. But maybe this is a only a limit on very small things like atoms, and you may be able to do it with larger things like cells.)
Science says this? Perhaps there are more limitations I need to add to my list. I said that everything that is only physical dies, not that anything ceases to exist.