ADPR production was inhibited all the way for NAM. But for NR, the inhibition stopped after 5 hours. So NAM is a Sirtuins inhibitor and NR is a activator after 5 hours.I asked you to point out where that comparison was made in your paper, and you cannot because there is no comparison. No one is making the comparison because there is no money in it. I have tried NR and NMN and gotten nothing from them, however, I got very strong results from 2 grams each of Nam+ribose. Which is to be expected, as that would be like taking 4 grams of NR.
Fig. 5b of Brenner's paper tells the story. The average NAD+ produced by NR and Nam was the same within the error bars. And given that the paper speaks of "mole equivalent doses of Nam," that suggest the researchers used twice as much NR as Nam, as the molar weight of NR (255.2) is roughly twice that of Nam (122.1).
As a recent paper shows NR is indispensable in liver metabolism. So some cells without the ability to utilize NAM can greatly increase their NAD+ from the increased supply of NR. So just measuring the total NAD+ doesn’t reflect all the benefits of NR.
Edited by MikeDC, 26 December 2019 - 02:11 PM.