• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In    
  • Create Account
  LongeCity
              Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans

Photo

Scare story interview about senolytics

senolytics

  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

#1 osris

  • Guest
  • 531 posts
  • 81

Posted 07 December 2019 - 02:31 PM


Here is an interview with senolytics skeptic Michael Fossel who says that senolytic therapy is dangerous:
 
 
The interviewer seems to get the better of him though, and questions his many assumptions.
 
Here is a rebuttal of the interview and a critical discussion of it:
 
 
Your thoughts.

Edited by osris, 07 December 2019 - 02:38 PM.

  • Informative x 2

#2 Rays

  • Guest
  • 72 posts
  • 28
  • Location:Netherlands

Posted 09 December 2019 - 12:50 PM

Thanks for posting.

I think a three stage approach may be best:

  1. Remove senescent cells
  2. Increase stem cell pool
  3. Lengthen telomeres

 


  • Good Point x 2

#3 HBRU

  • Guest
  • 167 posts
  • 45
  • Location:Italy
  • NO

Posted 10 December 2019 - 02:06 PM

Use of topoisomerase inhibitors for antineoplastic treatments may lead to secondary neoplasms because of DNA damaging properties of the compounds. Also plant derived polyphenols shows signs of carcinogenity, especially in fetuses and neonates who do not detoxify the compounds sufficiently.[12][13][14] An association between high intake of tea (containing polyphenols) during pregnancy and elevated risk of childhood malignant central nervous system (CNS) tumours has been found.[15][16]

 

https://en.wikipedia...erase_inhibitor

 


  • Off-Topic x 2





Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: senolytics

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users