• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In    
  • Create Account
  LongeCity
              Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans

Photo
- - - - -

The need for cycling ?

nad+

  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
1 reply to this topic

#1 cjacek

  • Guest
  • 56 posts
  • 0
  • Location:Canada

Posted 09 June 2021 - 10:04 AM


Hi,

In my late 40's, and in an effort to keep my NAD+ levels at optimum, I'm taking a bunch of things daily  including a NAD+ precursor, NAMPT and AMPK activators and CD38 and NNMT inhibitors. But I was just wondering if cycling these, for example 5 days on / 2 days off, could possibly prevent adaptation, while at the same time not diminishing any benefits. I personally thinks so but would like your opinions on this. I feel that taking 2 days off per week (rather than just 1) might be more effective at preventing possible homeostasis, while likely still keeping good progress going. What do you think? 

Thanks,

Dan 


  • like x 1

#2 Gal220

  • Guest
  • 1,030 posts
  • 624
  • Location:United States

Posted 06 July 2021 - 03:40 AM

I cant find the thread, another user said Alive By Science rep recommended 4 days on, 3 days off.


  • like x 1





Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: nad+

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users