972 replies to this topic

[Gal220]

LNP bio distribution data from Australia's TGA

 

"I think we can be certain this information was on Anthony Fauci's desk...Bear in mind all this was known before the vaccines were approved...I'm struggling for words."

 

 

 

 

[Gal220]

"I took all these senior scientist at their word.."

 

[Gal220]

So according to the report being cited as damning proof of horrible adverse effects, the actual serious adverse reaction rate is 3 in 100,000.

 

What's so frustrating is data like this can have such a wide variance

 

Original clinical trial showed 1 in 800 serious adverse events, and this was with an expensive highly purified shot. 

They never actually tested what was mass injected which was a much dirtier manufacturing process

 

https://brownstone.o...-vaccines-safe/

Edited by Gal220, 25 March 2023 - 10:08 PM.

[smithx]

What's so frustrating is data like this can have such a wide variance

 

Original clinical trial showed 1 in 800 serious adverse events, and this was with an expensive highly purified shot. 

They never actually tested what was mass injected which was a much dirtier manufacturing process

 

Since the current data showing 0.03 serious adverse events per 1,000 vaccinations is post-marketing across a very large population of millions, and the original studies were at least 2 orders of magnitude smaller, we have to rely on the more recent population-wide figures and conclude that the smaller studies may have been under powered or had other issues causing the results to differ from what we actually see in the general population.

 

 

[Gal220]

The German health minister is claiming 1 in 10,000 serious adverse events(Much closer to the clinical trial results).  What is acceptable?

And no doubt, he is going with the most conservative number he can possibly get away with here.  He isn't exaggerating

 

"About a week ago, Germany's health minister, Karl Lauterbach, admitted on national television that the rate of severe adverse events for the covid vaccine, per government data, was 1 in 10,000."

 

https://youtu.be/653x0SpYd48?t=663 (timestamped)

 

Full video

[Gal220]

It sure is interesting that we have members here who find it "pointless time wasting" that the information above was withheld(FOI and still some is blacked out) AND called rubbish by health agencies

 

All the while knowing they were lying, they had the studies in hand Jan 2021.

 

 

What's more disturbing to me is these are Pfizer documents, instead of 3rd party testing

Edited by Gal220, 26 March 2023 - 01:50 AM.

[Daniel Cooper]

Since the current data showing 0.03 serious adverse events per 1,000 vaccinations is post-marketing across a very large population of millions, and the original studies were at least 2 orders of magnitude smaller, we have to rely on the more recent population-wide figures and conclude that the smaller studies may have been under powered or had other issues causing the results to differ from what we actually see in the general population.

 

Bigger sample sizes are always preferred.

 

On the other hand, you have to believe that the people in the initial clinical trials were being considerably more closely followed than the people out in the wild receiving the vaccine once it was released.

 

For instance (I've told this story before around here) - my wife has a friend/former co-worker now retired. Early 70s. She took the first two shots back in Q1 of 2021. On one of those shots (think it was #2) she was admitted to the ER for chest pains and a suspected heart attack. No heart attack but she did have myocarditis.  This was like the 1st or 2nd day post jab.

 

She asked the attending physician whether the vaccination had anything to do with it and was told unequivocally that it did not. I highly suspect she did not make it into any database following adverse vaccine reactions.

 

So the reality is you have a much bigger sample group but almost certainly lower quality data. I have no idea as to what percentage of adverse reactions are that not reported once the vaccine was approved for mass release, but I'm pretty confident it's non-zero.

 

 I took the first two "jabs" so I'm certainly on the side of rooting for there being no long term issues.

[Gal220]

Professor Clancy responds to the TGA data from Australia

 

[Gal220]

DNA contamination with the mRNA, far exceeding regulation limits.  Should be pulled if they can't clean it up(43:04 in video below)

 

https://twitter.com/...566930888601600

https://anandamide.s...izer-monovalent

 

 

Videos

https://rumble.com/v...pril-moss.html (start 16:52)

https://rumble.com/v...d-products.html

 

As he mentions, his methods can easily be duplicated

Edited by Gal220, 26 March 2023 - 09:38 AM.

[Mind]

 

 

 

When people quote sources they really ought to read them carefully. Or at least read the abstracts. The report mentioned is available here:

 

https://www.pei.de/S...icationFile&v=4

 

In the abstract it says:
 

 

So according to the report being cited as damning proof of horrible adverse effects, the actual serious adverse reaction rate is 3 in 100,000.

 

This sort of quoting of 2nd hand sources, like politically motivated bloggers and conspiracy theory tweets, is why I think we need a rule that primary sources only are allowed, and that they need to be scientific studies, not someone's opinion.

 

 

There were over 34,000 serious adverse side effects from the COVID injections in Germany. This is a fact. It was reported by the government. Is it impermissible to report facts now?

[Mind]

Here is anther peer-reviewed study indicating blood clotting problems (cerebral venous thrombosis) associated with the COVID injections.

 

125 children were suspected killed by the Pfizer injection in Portugal according to this investigative report. This is disturbing because children have a very near-zero chance pf dying from COVID. Just a reminder, the US just approved a 4th COVID injection for kids and toddlers, something no other country in the world is doing (because they are not as incompetent and unethical as US "health" bureaucrats).

 

I no longer believe anything the CDC says about COVID. Nothing. They have been caught lying and hiding data on multiple occasions (this is a fact. The CDC has even admitted to lying). They are still hiding data that is normally publicly available. They had to be sued to release this recent treasure trove of data, showing they were anticipating an avalanche of reports of side effects and deaths from the COVID injections. Then it happened and they are pretending as if there is nothing going on. No side effects. No deaths. They can't even be bothered to request autopsies.

 

In a recent FOIA request, the CDC admitted that it doesn't even know how many people died "with COVID" or "from COVID". They say that the way they gather data in their system does not allow them to make a distinction. Leadership at the CDC needs to be fired, like yesterday,

 

The Expose has done a good job of combing through the ONS data. People in the UK who got the COVID injections comprise 92% of all COVID deaths in 2022. The un-injected had the lowest COVID mortality in 2022.

 

The scale of side effects and deaths from the COVID injections are being hidden from the world, for the most part. Doctors and nurses are barely even considering reporting injection deaths and side effects. One nurse got fired for reporting suspected side effects and deaths to VAERS. It is so bad in the US that one University Health center (UCSF) is banning their health practitioners from reporting suspected vax injuries and deaths to VAERS. Not only is this unethical, it is against Federal Law. They don't care.

 

Like I mentioned earlier, I am glad the rate of side effects and injuries from the COVID injections is low. I don't want to see some my family and friends dropping dead. However, I continue to get reports of side effects. One acquaintance recently reported severe tinnitus developing immediately after getting the booster. This side effect has been reported around the world (along with vision problems/blindness). It surely points toward an effect on the nervous system, probably in cases where the COVID injection substantially leaves the arm, creating autoimmune responses, including against the central nervous system.

 

 

 

 

 

[Mind]

Yet another review of COVID cases finds no association between SARS-CoV2 infection and myocarditis. The massive increase in myocarditis in the last two years appears to be from the COVID injections.

 

Months and years after most countries of the world decide that the harms of the COVID injections outweigh the benefits, the WHO is finally walking back their everyone-gets-injected-all-the-time stance. Even in Australia, they are no longer recommending the COVID injections for anyone under 65. The U.S seems to be the last country on earth promoting multiple COVID injections all the way down to toddlers. Why is that?

[Mind]

A poll by Rassmussen finds that citizens in the US know equally as many people who died of COVID as they know who (they suspected) died of the COVID injections. The thousands of young people who have "died suddenly" are not going unnoticed by the general public.

 

I don't think people realize the scale of the deception that is going on here. The US "health" bureaucrats/CDC and major hospital systems are ignoring and suppressing any and all discussion about COVID injection problems/deaths. Even in Italy, doctors are being suspended for even the mere suggestion of autopsies for suspected COVID vax deaths.

 

You know it is bad when Australia is not recommending the COVID injection for any healthy people under 65. The only reason they (and most countries in the world) have stopped recommending the COVID injections is because the harms OUTWEIGH the risks. There are plenty of data points showing a massive rise in death and disability in the most vaccinated countries. There are several peer-reviewed studies showing the injected people are MORE likely to catch COVID, MORE likely to infect others, and MORE likely to get sick. They are trying to hide the scale of this debacle by "changing their recommendations". They should be honest and ethical and tell everyone there are severe side effects for a lot of people and that it is not very effective. Most of our public "health" leaders have not been honest or ethical during the COVID panic.

 

Even the most ardent virulent COVID injection peddlers are soft-peddling backward on their recommendations.

 

You might recall that a short while ago, the US/UK governments and leaders at the CDC and FDA were pushing for vax mandates and vax passports. They wanted to take kids away from parents. They wanted to lock people up in camps. They were leading the charge to harass, fire, and destroy anyone who didn't want to take the vax. Social media was full of vicious trolls scolding everyone as "grandma killers" if they didn't get the vax.

 

Now they are all back-peddling about the safety and effectiveness of the vax. Don't expect any apologies.