• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In    
  • Create Account
  LongeCity
              Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans

Photo

Scientists REVERSE age-related functional decline in mouse livers!


  • Please log in to reply
15 replies to this topic

#1 Irradiance

  • Guest
  • 13 posts
  • 0
  • Location:Brisbane

Posted 11 August 2008 - 12:33 AM


In scientific first, Einstein researchers correct decline in organ function associated with old age

(BRONX, NY) — As people age, their cells become less efficient at getting rid of damaged protein — resulting in a buildup of toxic material that is especially pronounced in Alzheimer's, Parkinson's disease, and other neurodegenerative disorders.

Now, for the first time, scientists at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University have prevented this age-related decline in an entire organ — the liver — and shown that, as a result, the livers of older animals functioned as well as they did when the animals were much younger. Published in the online edition of Nature Medicine, these findings suggest that therapies for boosting protein clearance might help stave off some of the declines in function that accompany old age. The study's senior author was Dr. Ana Maria Cuervo, associate professor in the departments of developmental & molecular biology, medicine and anatomy & structural biology at Einstein.

The cells of all organisms have several surveillance systems designed to find, digest and recycle damaged proteins. Many studies have documented that these processes become less efficient with age, allowing protein to gradually accumulate inside cells. But aging researchers continue debating whether this protein buildup actually contributes to the functional losses of aging or instead is merely associated with those losses. The Einstein study was aimed at resolving the controversy.

One of these surveillance systems — responsible for handling 30 percent or more of damaged cellular protein — uses molecules known as chaperones to seek out damaged proteins. After finding such a protein, the chaperone ferries it towards one of the cell's many lysosomes — membrane-bound sacs filled with enzymes. When the chaperone and its cargo "dock" on a receptor molecule on the lysosome's surface, the damaged protein is drawn into the lysosome and rapidly digested by its enzymes.

In previous work, Dr. Cuervo found that the chaperone surveillance system, in particular, becomes less efficient as cells become older, resulting in a buildup of undigested proteins within the cells. She also detected the primary cause for this age-related decline: a fall-off in the number of lysosomal receptors capable of binding chaperones and their damaged proteins. Could replenishing lost receptors in older animals maintain the efficiency of this protein-removal system throughout an animal's lifespan and, perhaps, maintain the function of the animal's cells and organs as well?

To find out, Dr. Cuervo created a transgenic mouse model equipped with an extra gene — one that codes for the receptor that normally declines in number with increasing age. Another genetic manipulation allowed Dr. Cuervo to turn on this extra gene only in the liver and at a time of her choosing, merely by changing the animals' diet.

To keep the level of the receptor constant throughout life, Dr. Cuervo waited until mice were six months old (the age that the chaperone system's efficiency begins to decline) before turning on the added receptor gene. When the mice were examined at 22 to 26 months of age (equivalent to approximately 80 years old in humans), the liver cells of transgenic mice digested and recycled protein far more efficiently than in their normal counterparts of the same age — and, in fact, just as efficiently as in normal six-month old mice.

Does maintaining efficient protein clearance in liver cells of an older animal translate into better functioning for the liver as a whole? Since a key function of the liver is metabolizing chemicals, Dr. Cuervo answered this question by injecting a muscle relaxant into very old transgenic mice and very old normal mice. The very old transgenic mice metabolized the muscle relaxant much more quickly than very old normal mice and at a rate comparable to young normal mice.

"Our study showed that functions can be maintained in older animals so long as damaged proteins continue to be efficiently removed — strongly supporting the idea that protein buildup in cells plays an important role in aging itself," says Dr. Cuervo. "Even more important, these results show that it's possible to correct this protein 'logjam' that occurs in our cells as we get older, thereby perhaps helping us to enjoy healthier lives well into old age."

Dr. Cuervo next plans to study animal models of Alzheimer's, Parkinson's and other neurodegenerative brain diseases to see whether maintaining efficient protein clearance in the brain might help in treating them. "Most people with these conditions are born with a mutation that gives rise to defective proteins, but they don't experience symptoms until later in life," says Dr. Cuervo. "We think that's because their protein-clearance systems can handle abnormal proteins when the person is younger but get overwhelmed as their efficiency falls with age. By preventing this decline in protein clearance, we may be able to keep these people free of symptoms for a longer time."

Dr. Cuervo will also investigate whether maintaining efficient protein clearance in all the body's tissues will influence longevity and prevent the functional losses associated with growing old. "There's reason to hope that drugs exerting a similar effect throughout the body may help us enjoy healthier lives well into old age," says Dr. Cuervo. Meanwhile, she notes, evidence is mounting that two dietary interventions —low-fat and calorie-restricted diets — help cells to maintain efficient protein clearance.



#2 Lazarus Long

  • Life Member, Guardian
  • 8,116 posts
  • 242
  • Location:Northern, Western Hemisphere of Earth, Usually of late, New York

Posted 11 August 2008 - 12:41 AM

This makes 3 times we have posted this article today but it does belong in the genetics section too.

(Lucid)
Very interesting, should probably be in the bio science forum. But very cool.


I agree so I merged the one started later by Dachshund in the supplements area into this one for consistency. However the post is also Bioscience along with a related discovery here.

Click HERE to rent this GENETICS advertising spot to support LongeCity (this will replace the google ad above).

#3 forever freedom

  • Guest
  • 2,362 posts
  • 67

Posted 11 August 2008 - 01:12 AM

This is really nice.

#4 dachshund

  • Guest
  • 98 posts
  • 1

Posted 11 August 2008 - 02:58 AM

http://www.physorg.c...s137592884.html

#5 VP.

  • Guest
  • 498 posts
  • 200

Posted 11 August 2008 - 04:12 AM

http://www.physorg.c...s137592884.html

Dr. Cuervo will also investigate whether maintaining efficient protein clearance in all the body's tissues will influence longevity and prevent the functional losses associated with growing old. "There's reason to hope that drugs exerting a similar effect throughout the body may help us enjoy healthier lives well into old age," says Dr. Cuervo. Meanwhile, she notes, evidence is mounting that two dietary interventions —low-fat and calorie-restricted diets — help cells to maintain efficient protein clearance.


Very important news IMHO.

#6 lucid

  • Guest
  • 1,195 posts
  • 65
  • Location:Austin, Tx

Posted 11 August 2008 - 04:22 AM

Very interesting, should probably be in the bio science forum. But very cool.

#7 luv2increase

  • Guest
  • 2,529 posts
  • 37
  • Location:Ohio

Posted 11 August 2008 - 06:08 AM

The best way to make sure one has optimal protein clearance is by taking care of your kidneys (drinking lots of water) and being sure that the alkaline/acid balance of the body is in favor of the alkaline side!!!! Reducing calorie intake etc is just plain stupid not to mention disgusting. If I looked like a skinny CR freak, I'd die prematurely due to low self-esteem and stress from looking like sh*t and everyone (friends & family & girlfriend ---> HELL IF EVEN HAD ONE) thinking that I was anorexic or something. My cortisol levels would be through the roof causing all my bio-markers to go down the tubes.

See, the monkeys didn't have to worry about this negative aspect of their calorie reduction. If they did consciously know they looked like crap, they wouldn't have lived longer than normal diet monkeys. ;)

#8 Ghostrider

  • Guest
  • 1,996 posts
  • 56
  • Location:USA

Posted 11 August 2008 - 06:31 AM

The best way to make sure one has optimal protein clearance is by taking care of your kidneys (drinking lots of water) and being sure that the alkaline/acid balance of the body is in favor of the alkaline side!!!! Reducing calorie intake etc is just plain stupid not to mention disgusting. If I looked like a skinny CR freak, I'd die prematurely due to low self-esteem and stress from looking like sh*t and everyone (friends & family & girlfriend ---> HELL IF EVEN HAD ONE) thinking that I was anorexic or something. My cortisol levels would be through the roof causing all my bio-markers to go down the tubes.

See, the monkeys didn't have to worry about this negative aspect of their calorie reduction. If they did consciously know they looked like crap, they wouldn't have lived longer than normal diet monkeys. ;)


I don't see an advantage of basing one's self esteem on his/her appearance. The trick is to avoid aging as much as possible. Someday though, once SENS or some other robust anti-aging strategy is fully implemented, maybe no one would be doing calorie restriction...it's a trade off, a personal choice.

#9 curious_sle

  • Guest
  • 464 posts
  • 12
  • Location:Switzerland

Posted 11 August 2008 - 03:47 PM

<h2 class="inline">source
</h2><h2 class="inline">How recycling could keep your organs young</h2>
  • 18:00 10 August 2008
  • NewScientist.com news service
  • Tamsin Osborne
Imagine if we could stop the ageing process in its tracks, keeping our organs youthful for the rest of our lives. That's exactly what a team of researchers have done with the livers of mice, raising the possibility that this might one day be possible in humans.

Damaged proteins gradually accumulate in the cells of our body as we age, but until now no-one knew whether this build-up was actually responsible for the functional decline of our organs.

Now research has shown that proteins build up because the cellular cleaning machinery breaks down. By engineering mice in which this system remains operative despite old age, Ana Maria Cuervo and her team at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University in New York have prevented the rodents' livers from ageing.

The implication is that if we could artificially preserve this system in our own cells we might be able to prevent age-related damage in our organs too.


Partners in grime
Old proteins are cleaned up by "chaperone" molecules that dock with enzyme-filled compartments called lysosomes, where the unwanted molecules are recycled.

To extend the working life of the clean-up system, Cuervo's team made mice with an extra copy of the gene that codes for a receptor protein that lets the chaperone dock to the lysosome.

The team found that the livers of old mice with the extra gene worked just as well as the livers of young normal mice, and much better than those of old mice without the extra gene.

But how would this work in humans? We can't yet safely add genes to the cells of living people, but Cuervo explains that finding a drug that stops the existing receptor proteins breaking down could have the same effect.

"We are starting drug screening with the idea of looking for compounds that stabilise this particular receptor in the lysosomes," she says.


Diet hope
Better still would be to maintain the pathway through diet alone. "We know that the stability of this protein is related to changes in lipids," says Cuervo. A low-fat diet might therefore be able to prolong receptor life.

As this protein clearance pathway is used all over the body, Cuervo's team hope their finding will be relevant in other organs, such as the brain. In diseases like Alzheimer's and Parkinson's, an abnormal amount of proteins build up in the brain cells. Being able to improve the clearance of these proteins might allow us to delay the onset of symptoms.

But others are more sceptical. Douglas Schmucker of the University of California, San Francisco, has his doubts.

"We have been unable to demonstrate such age-related changes in the same enzymes in non-human primates," he says. "The rodent liver may not be the most appropriate model to mimic age-related changes in the human."

Journal reference: Nature Medicine (DOI: 10.1038/nm.1851)

http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nm.1851

#10 Mind

  • Life Member, Director, Moderator, Treasurer
  • 19,046 posts
  • 2,000
  • Location:Wausau, WI

Posted 11 August 2008 - 07:13 PM

Better still would be to maintain the pathway through diet alone. "We know that the stability of this protein is related to changes in lipids," says Cuervo. A low-fat diet might therefore be able to prolong receptor life.


The 2nd sentence is not in quotes. Who's opinion is this? How low is low? Fats are essential for optimum health. I would find it odd that an extremely low fat diet could enhance organ function (based on better chaperone mediated autophagy -CMA).

Ana Maria Cuervo found that CR upregulates CMA activity in mice. In conjunction with this most recent research, Cuervo's study would seem to elucidate another mechanism by which CR extends lifespan - by upregulating CMA activity and thus preserving better organ function late in life. CR perhaps slows the decline of CMA activity with age, but does not stop the decline - and thus the need for LysoSENS. Aubrey and Methuselah must be very happy with this new research as it would seem to give the premise behind LysoSENS a huge boost.

#11 Mariusz

  • Guest
  • 164 posts
  • 0
  • Location:Hartford, CT

Posted 14 August 2008 - 02:24 PM

Scientists have stopped the ageing process in an entire organ for the first time, a study released today says.

http://www.abc.net.a...tm?site=science

Looks like Lysosens makes sense:D
Mariusz

#12 Michael

  • Advisor, Moderator
  • 1,293 posts
  • 1,792
  • Location:Location Location

Posted 21 August 2008 - 01:21 PM

Scientists have stopped the ageing process in an entire organ for the first time, a study released today says.

http://www.abc.net.a...tm?site=science

Looks like Lysosens makes sense:D

Indeed. I just posted on this study in detail over at the MF Forums.

-Michael

#13 VictorBjoerk

  • Member, Life Member
  • 1,763 posts
  • 91
  • Location:Sweden

Posted 21 August 2008 - 01:58 PM

What about the hayflick limit in the organ?

#14 maestro949

  • Guest
  • 2,350 posts
  • 4
  • Location:Rhode Island, USA

Posted 21 August 2008 - 04:51 PM

Impressive. Provides hope for genetic tinkering but some caution is merited as several questions remain.

Did they truly stop the aging process of the liver (per the glitzy titles of the articles) or did they simply stop a single aging pathway? If these mouse livers were kept alive through some type of synthetic life support or if the experiment were done in a longer lived species, wouldn't the liver have accumulated numerous other issues over time?

So what would be the next step in this research path? Devising a retrovirus to insert a gene that encodes supplemental protein clearance proteins and then testing this on aged mice? In multiple organs?

"My ideal intervention in the future would be a better diet rather than a pill," she (Cuervo) says.


Is there a distinction? Of course she means a synthesized molecule that could be delivered to provide a similar protein clearance function but if an animal or vegetable product can't be found to mimic the benefits then wouldn't a "pill" be the better solution? Perhaps she's concerned about side affects that accompany many drugs? Perhaps I'm paying too much attention to what she thinks rather than the facts. Probably :)

#15 Athanasios

  • Guest
  • 2,616 posts
  • 163
  • Location:Texas

Posted 21 August 2008 - 06:55 PM

Did they truly stop the aging process of the liver (per the glitzy titles of the articles) or did they simply stop a single aging pathway?

Exactly my thoughts. My guess would be that this would not have as big of an impact on a more complex organ.

also highlighting from Michael's post at MF:

It would also be useful to see any long-term studies of abnormalities in these animals. Another problem that plagues, interventions that rely on perturbing the body's basic metabolic regulatory systems (the "gerontological" approach) is that doing so inevitably harbors side-effects. Those pathways are regulated as they are because evolution has determined, through trial and error, that they are the best way to keep us functioning normally and healthily in a real-world environment, and we mess with them for a lifetime at our peril.


Edited by cnorwood, 21 August 2008 - 06:59 PM.


Click HERE to rent this GENETICS advertising spot to support LongeCity (this will replace the google ad above).

#16 Michael

  • Advisor, Moderator
  • 1,293 posts
  • 1,792
  • Location:Location Location

Posted 22 August 2008 - 01:01 AM

How recycling could keep your organs young
18:00 10 August 2008
NewScientist.com news service

[...] But others are more sceptical. Douglas Schmucker of the University of California, San Francisco, has his doubts.

"We have been unable to demonstrate such age-related changes in the same enzymes in non-human primates," he says. "The rodent liver may not be the most appropriate model to mimic age-related changes in the human."

Hadn't seen this; it's an extremely important caveat, if so. I can't find any obvious report of this; maybe it's in (1), or unpublished. A key question would be how young they started tracking.

What about the hayflick limit in the organ?

The Hayflick limit is essentially a lab artifact, caused by the culturing of cells under atmospheric (20%) rather than physiologic (<3%) oxygen, which massively increases ROS-induced telomere shortening. It is almost never reached in vivo in humans.

Also, it now looks IAC as if the liver is not actually a regenerating organ as once thought (2).

Did they truly stop the aging process of the liver (per the glitzy titles of the articles) or did they simply stop a single aging pathway?

The latter -- but as reported, it had a lot of downstream benefits. Makes me very hopeful for LysoSENS!

If these mouse livers were kept alive through some type of synthetic life support or if the experiment were done in a longer lived species, wouldn't the liver have accumulated numerous other issues over time?

Sure, and they were still accumulating 'issues' as it was -- just much more slowly.

"My ideal intervention in the future would be a better diet rather than a pill," she (Cuervo) says.


Is there a distinction? Of course she means a synthesized molecule that could be delivered to provide a similar protein clearance function but if an animal or vegetable product can't be found to mimic the benefits then wouldn't a "pill" be the better solution? Perhaps she's concerned about side affects that accompany many drugs?

I'm pretty sure she's referring to the CR effect, rather than to a 'pharmacological' effect of a food or nutrient.

And, of course, the record so far of guessing what goodies present in foods whose consumption is associated with Good Things should be put in a pill is pretty miserable (eg (3) ...

References
1. Schmucker DL.
Age-related changes in liver structure and function: Implications for disease ?
Exp Gerontol. 2005 Aug-Sep;40(8-9):650-9. Review.
PMID: 16102930 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

2. Lazzerini Denchi E, Celli G, de Lange T.
Hepatocytes with extensive telomere deprotection and fusion remain viable and regenerate liver mass through endoreduplication.
Genes Dev. 2006 Oct 1;20(19):2648-53.
PMID: 17015429 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

3. Bjelakovic G, Nikolova D, Gluud LL, Simonetti RG, Gluud C.
Mortality in randomized trials of antioxidant supplements for primary and secondary prevention: systematic review and meta-analysis.
JAMA. 2007 Feb 28;297(8):842-57. Review. Erratum in: JAMA. 2008 Feb 20;299(7):765-6.
PMID: 17327526 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users