• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In    
  • Create Account
  LongeCity
              Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans

Photo
- - - - -

investigating the copper-chelation/collagen/tendons issue


  • Please log in to reply
44 replies to this topic

#31 geddarkstorm

  • Guest
  • 191 posts
  • 31

Posted 01 December 2008 - 10:04 PM

Good ideas for elphaba, Maxwatt.

geddarkstorm -- A metabolite of quercetin is a Sirt1 inhibitor. Despite it's other benefits, it should perhaps not be used with resveratrol.


Actually, I'm not all that convinced about that. There is only one paper, which I'll have to go to lab to get full access to, but they did not see inhibition of Sirt1 in vitro cells, only inhibition of their recombinant Sirt1 from the sound of it. Quercetin had no effect on the in vitro cells. That is, it's stated:


SIRT1 stimulation by polyphenols is affected by their stability and metabolism.
de Boer VC, de Goffau MC, Arts IC, Hollman PC, Keijer J. Mech Ageing Dev. 2006 Jul;127(7):618-27. Epub 2006 Apr 17.
"Using metabolically active HT29 cells we were able to show that quercetin (a stimulator of recombinant SIRT1) could not stimulate intracellular SIRT1. The major quercetin metabolite in humans, quercetin 3-O-glucuronide, slightly inhibited the recombinant SIRT1 activity which explains the lack of stimulatory action of quercetin in HT29 cells."


When I go into lab again tomorrow, I'll grab the full paper and tell you what they really saw. But notice, in the abstract, that quercetin activated the recombinant Sirt1 outside of a cell, but didn't the Sirt in the cells, and then its metabolite slightly inhibited recombinant Sirt1 which is part of their a-cellular assay from the sounds of it? (not sure, again have to get the paper), and in the end, there was no net effect of Sirt1 intracellularly from what it sounds like the abstract says. Furthermore, we know that recombinant Sirt1 assays are misleading as resveratrol is seen to directly interact with recombinant Sirt1 having a fluorophore, but not directly interact with native Sirt1 (that is, resveratrol's molecular mode of action doesn't appear to be direct binding and activation to Sirt1, or at least it doesn't seem clear from the studies I've read. There's intracellular pathways to activate Sirt1's various roles after all and resveratrol may activate an upstream effector that then turns on Sirt1). And even more, Sirt1 does have various rolls, so which roll would quercetin be inhibiting? This isn't even in vivo, which may change things yet again, and I've seen two papers so far that say quercetin activates Sirt1 in more complex systems (one I'll be referencing later). I really need that paper..

Still, even if quercetin's metabolite mildly inhibits Sirt1, the great increase in Sirt1 given by resveratrol while quercetin is being metabolized is probably all that's needed in theory, as activation of Sirt1 even transiently can lead to the deacylation of the PGC-1 gene, and it is that gene's transcription that gives all the beneficial effects of resveratrol seen to date. In other words, studies where the PGC-1 gene was modified so it could not be deacylated by Sirt1 resulted in resveratrol having no effect on cell metabolism and gene expression. Conversely, putting in PGC-1 which was always deacylated gave the same effects as seen by resveratrol (PMID: 17112576). So, resveratrol acts through the Sirt1 pathway to turn on PGC-1 and that is where we see our benefits. Sirt1 doesn't have to be on long, which is why even though resveratrol has a half life of ~14 minutes (3 hours with quercetin?), it is till long enough to activate Sirt1 to turn on PGC-1. That's why I'm a little skeptical that quercetin interferes with resveratrol to a significant extent till I see more evidence, especially in vivo.

On the other hand, quercetin affects other pathways, such as MAPK's. The effects you have when taking it may be due to its other functions, not interference with resveratrol, per ce. For instance, quercetin increases the expression of Bone sialoprotein which is implied to nucleate hydroxyapatite crystals in mineralized connective tissues (PMID: 17243115). Depending on the source of your joint pain, that could be a reason it increases it, by increasing calcium crystal formation. On the other hand, for other people, quercetin and its main metabolite (which is the sulfated version, not the glucuronidated form according to this paper) inhibits the inflammatory eicosanoid leukotriene B4 (PMID: 18096136), a powerful inflammatory mediator that may play a role in a lot of arthritis and other pains, along with other inflammatory eicosanoids. So, if that was the source, then quercetin would be expected to help. Nothing can be ruled out of course, and different cell lines and biochemistries may respond differently to the combination, and the two at once may have more effects than either alone. It would be interesting to know if quercetin by itself when not taking resveratrol affects your level of joint pain in any way, and maybe that will help tease this issue apart.

Also, take a look at this paper:


Resveratrol protects dopaminergic neurons in midbrain slice culture from multiple insults.
Okawara M, Katsuki H, Kurimoto E, Shibata H, Kume T, Akaike A. Biochem Pharmacol. 2007 Feb 15;73(4):550-60. Epub 2006 Nov 9.

"Notably, resveratrol activates sirtuin family of NAD-dependent histone deacetylases implicated in regulation of various cellular processes including gene transcription, DNA repair and apoptosis. Here we examined neuroprotective effect of resveratrol on dopaminergic neurons in organotypic midbrain slice culture. Resveratrol and quercetin, another sirtuin-activating polyphenol, prevented the decrease of dopaminergic neurons and the increase of propidium iodide uptake into slices induced by a dopaminergic neurotoxin 1-methyl-4-phenyl pyridinium (MPP(+))."

Albeit, this isn't working with the metabolites of either, and I don't know if the neurons would metabolize them, so definitely take it with a grain of salt - the quercetin may not even have had its protective effects via Sirt1 but some other mechanism. It still paints a complex picture as here's a cell line that displays benefits from both resveratrol and quercetin. Everywhere I look, the story is painfully complex for all these compounds...

EDIT: Holy moly this is terribly off topic.. sorry.

Edited by geddarkstorm, 01 December 2008 - 10:12 PM.


#32 maxwatt

  • Guest, Moderator LeadNavigator
  • 4,949 posts
  • 1,625
  • Location:New York

Posted 02 December 2008 - 12:04 PM

Good ideas for elphaba, Maxwatt.

geddarkstorm -- A metabolite of quercetin is a Sirt1 inhibitor. Despite it's other benefits, it should perhaps not be used with resveratrol.


Actually, I'm not all that convinced about that. There is only one paper, which I'll have to go to lab to get full access to, but they did not see inhibition of Sirt1 in vitro cells, only inhibition of their recombinant Sirt1 from the sound of it. Quercetin had no effect on the in vitro cells. That is, it's stated:

.....[see above post above for material that was edited for brevity's sake]

EDIT: Holy moly this is terribly off topic.. sorry.


Not so off topic. A lot of what we think we know we don't know.

I am wondering if the increase in joint pain I felt with quercetin was due to quercetin itself, or if it increased the serum levels of resveratrol, pushing the effective dose above the maximum point of the dose/response curve. Trying quercetin alone would possible give a clue. Luteolin also increases serum levels of resveratrol. This is something to revisit.

Click HERE to rent this advertising spot to support LongeCity (this will replace the google ad above).

#33 stephen_b

  • Guest
  • 1,735 posts
  • 231

Posted 02 December 2008 - 05:15 PM

I am wondering if the increase in joint pain I felt with quercetin was due to quercetin itself, or if it increased the serum levels of resveratrol, pushing the effective dose above the maximum point of the dose/response curve.

If that were true, then a smaller dose of resveratrol with quercetin would have the same effect as a larger dose of resveratrol.

StephenB

#34 FunkOdyssey

  • Guest
  • 3,443 posts
  • 166
  • Location:Manchester, CT USA

Posted 02 December 2008 - 05:36 PM

I am wondering if the increase in joint pain I felt with quercetin was due to quercetin itself, or if it increased the serum levels of resveratrol, pushing the effective dose above the maximum point of the dose/response curve.

If that were true, then a smaller dose of resveratrol with quercetin would have the same effect as a larger dose of resveratrol.

StephenB


...and the cackle of evil laughter echoed through the dark tunnels of Bill Sardi's lair.....

#35 hmm

  • Guest
  • 143 posts
  • 2

Posted 02 December 2008 - 06:39 PM

I am wondering if the increase in joint pain I felt with quercetin was due to quercetin itself, or if it increased the serum levels of resveratrol, pushing the effective dose above the maximum point of the dose/response curve.

If that were true, then a smaller dose of resveratrol with quercetin would have the same effect as a larger dose of resveratrol.

StephenB


...and the cackle of evil laughter echoed through the dark tunnels of Bill Sardi's lair.....

Doesn't Vivix have quercetin in it?

#36 geddarkstorm

  • Guest
  • 191 posts
  • 31

Posted 02 December 2008 - 06:56 PM

Seems the only way we'll find out for sure is if we test it, heh. Unfortunately, I don't have access to that paper, even through the university - tis irksome.

Edited by geddarkstorm, 02 December 2008 - 06:58 PM.


#37 maxwatt

  • Guest, Moderator LeadNavigator
  • 4,949 posts
  • 1,625
  • Location:New York

Posted 03 December 2008 - 01:37 AM

I am wondering if the increase in joint pain I felt with quercetin was due to quercetin itself, or if it increased the serum levels of resveratrol, pushing the effective dose above the maximum point of the dose/response curve.

If that were true, then a smaller dose of resveratrol with quercetin would have the same effect as a larger dose of resveratrol.

StephenB


Exactly.

#38 stephen_b

  • Guest
  • 1,735 posts
  • 231

Posted 03 December 2008 - 06:47 PM

I am wondering if the increase in joint pain I felt with quercetin was due to quercetin itself, or if it increased the serum levels of resveratrol, pushing the effective dose above the maximum point of the dose/response curve.

If that were true, then a smaller dose of resveratrol with quercetin would have the same effect as a larger dose of resveratrol.

StephenB


Exactly.

I guess I was attempting a subliminal message to get you to do the experiment. :)

StephenB

#39 maxwatt

  • Guest, Moderator LeadNavigator
  • 4,949 posts
  • 1,625
  • Location:New York

Posted 03 December 2008 - 08:58 PM

I am wondering if the increase in joint pain I felt with quercetin was due to quercetin itself, or if it increased the serum levels of resveratrol, pushing the effective dose above the maximum point of the dose/response curve.

If that were true, then a smaller dose of resveratrol with quercetin would have the same effect as a larger dose of resveratrol.

StephenB


Exactly.

I guess I was attempting a subliminal message to get you to do the experiment. :)

StephenB


I require about half as much resveratrol now as I did a year ago for the same level of pain relief in my joints. Using more causes an increase in pain. Other effects, such as better stamina, feeling of well being (mild, not extreme) decreased cold sensitivity, and perhaps lowered blood sugar, seem to be the same as with the higher dose.

Perhaps activating sirtuins has a cummulative effect; the genes stay activated (resulting in more P53 deacytlase and nf-KappaB inhibition). Or the changes induced mean natural sirtuin activation is returned to a more youthful state, so less exogenous stimulation is needed.

I still use 1.4 to 1.6 grams a day. I don't have any quercetin handy, or I might try that experiment. But I am not so curious as to go out and acquire any.

#40 geddarkstorm

  • Guest
  • 191 posts
  • 31

Posted 05 December 2008 - 01:34 AM

I require about half as much resveratrol now as I did a year ago for the same level of pain relief in my joints. Using more causes an increase in pain. Other effects, such as better stamina, feeling of well being (mild, not extreme) decreased cold sensitivity, and perhaps lowered blood sugar, seem to be the same as with the higher dose.

Perhaps activating sirtuins has a cummulative effect; the genes stay activated (resulting in more P53 deacytlase and nf-KappaB inhibition). Or the changes induced mean natural sirtuin activation is returned to a more youthful state, so less exogenous stimulation is needed.

I still use 1.4 to 1.6 grams a day. I don't have any quercetin handy, or I might try that experiment. But I am not so curious as to go out and acquire any.


Hm, that is all very interesting to hear, thanks much for the info. You've been using resveratrol for about two years, based on your last post in the 1 year thread?

Taking into account the recent research about the role of Sirt1 distraction away from regulation and to DNA repair playing a part in aging, it's likely that long term stimulation of Sirt1 will reverse the accruement of Sirt1 gene regulation loss - that is, repackaging of heterochromatin and deactivated genes back to youthful levels, at which time keeping Sirt1 active will then mostly serve to keep PGC-1alpha on transcriptionally, and protect from DNA damage (specifically radiation, which causes double stranded breaks that Sirt1 is required for the repair of).

In that theoretical view, it makes perfect sense why you need less of it now. It's also likely then, if all this is correct, that you won't need to further decrease resveratrol intake much if at all once full Sirt1 gene pattern regulation is restored throughout your body, which it may now be.

#41 qqqsimmons

  • Guest
  • 9 posts
  • 0

Posted 06 December 2008 - 02:58 PM

i wouldn't be at all surprised if resveratrol had an effect on copper levels. after a few weeks on Country Life Res+, i developed tinnitus.

after reading this thread, and remember my last case of tinnitus from zinc supplementation, i got a copper supplement.

a few hours after the first dose, the noise was pretty much gone. well, that was only about six hours ago, so i can't say for sure...

#42 geddarkstorm

  • Guest
  • 191 posts
  • 31

Posted 08 December 2008 - 11:35 PM

i wouldn't be at all surprised if resveratrol had an effect on copper levels. after a few weeks on Country Life Res+, i developed tinnitus.

after reading this thread, and remember my last case of tinnitus from zinc supplementation, i got a copper supplement.

a few hours after the first dose, the noise was pretty much gone. well, that was only about six hours ago, so i can't say for sure...


That Country Life stuff is full of a lot more than resveratrol (only 50% resveratrol, who knows how much of that is trans, and only 100 mg is pretty much nothing). Also, I can't find anywhere where copper is associated with tinnitus what so ever, only zinc, which alleviates it. Copper is only taken with zinc as zinc can lead to copper deficiencies by impairing copper uptake from food. Tinnitus is associated with low levels of seratonin, which resveratrol may or may not affect if you're also taking a seratonin inhibitor thing. I doubt with the levels you're taking with that Country life stuff that resveratrol could do anything to your seratonin, and certainly not to copper.

#43 bentl

  • Life Member
  • 32 posts
  • 8
  • Location:Chicago

Posted 15 December 2008 - 01:12 AM

I just started reading this thread and was wondering if resv is known to inhibit healing, vascularization, tissue repair? If so , it could it be that the reports of joint and tendon pain are coming from people who are harder on their bodies. My understanding is that high intensity exercise results in muscle growth do to a response to the damage, inciting increased vascularization and tissue growth. If resv slows repair to a rate below the damage rate then cumulative damage would occur.

PS - if so, any suggestions on a thread that would be a better place to continue this?

#44 geddarkstorm

  • Guest
  • 191 posts
  • 31

Posted 15 December 2008 - 02:49 AM

I just started reading this thread and was wondering if resv is known to inhibit healing, vascularization, tissue repair? If so , it could it be that the reports of joint and tendon pain are coming from people who are harder on their bodies. My understanding is that high intensity exercise results in muscle growth do to a response to the damage, inciting increased vascularization and tissue growth. If resv slows repair to a rate below the damage rate then cumulative damage would occur.

PS - if so, any suggestions on a thread that would be a better place to continue this?


Quite the opposite. Resveratrol accelerates and causes healing and repair in a variety of tissues from arteries to neurons to cartilage. Here's a paper on it protecting cartilage cells, and another showing resveratrol protecting cartilage and stopping cartilage matrix loss and fighting inflammatory arthritis, and yet another showing protection against osteoarthritis.

So no, resveratrol has been shown to decrease tissue damage caused by inflammation and stress induced apoptosis and necrosis, and to increase tissue repair.

Edited by geddarkstorm, 15 December 2008 - 02:53 AM.


Click HERE to rent this advertising spot to support LongeCity (this will replace the google ad above).

#45 SearchHorizon

  • Guest
  • 167 posts
  • 28

Posted 27 December 2008 - 01:30 AM

My hunch is that metabolism of resveratrol shares some of the pathways that are triggered via low calorie dieting. Furthermore, I think one pathway is linked to deterioration of joints.

I have mentioned in other posts that I exercise religiously (although I am not religious). When I do a lot of lifting while in caloric deficit I start to develop joint pains. Greater the caloric deficit, greater the joint pains.

Edited by SearchHorizon, 27 December 2008 - 01:31 AM.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users