I really haven't thought about how immortality or even cryo-suspension might impact the law. Has anyone even thought about this in a serious sense?
I can only transpose some surprising findings I had as a cloning activist. For instance, even though we know Walt Disney isn't being preserved, what if he was? If revived, what claim would he have on his holdings? ( We used to wonder if a clone of walt could make some claim on the estate.)
If ten thousand people are suspended, what criteria should be used as to whom should be revived first?
If someone was revived and found to be profoundly disabled, should those reviving him be held responsible?
If life and aging were greatly extended, should the government have the right to forbid or strictly control reproduction? (The Raelian religion mandates that those who live the good life and qualify for cloning agree to give up their right to reproduce.)
These are just a few thoughts off the top of my head. Changed conditions require changed laws. Has there been any serious investigation/writing on this subject?