I found this interesting post on another forum I frequent:
Here's the 10 week study the article talks about
http://lipidworld.com/content/7/1/12 Here's the 30 day study
http://www.lipidworl.../content/4/1/12 Both of these studies on
irvingia gabonensis were conducted by Julius Oben, which raises huge red flags to me. Oben is the researcher behind
a study earlier this year showing that cissus quadrangularis was effective as a fat loss aid.
After digging around, I found that Oben, the lead researcher, is actually employed at Gateway Health Alliances Inc, which supplied all the testing materials (and probably funded) all of these studies (if you search, you'll find "All testing materials were supplied by Gateway Health Alliances").
Apparently, they've hired Oben as the "Chief Scientific Officer" at Gateway. How's that for impartial.
In addition, Oben holds a patent on Cissus' use as a weight loss aid:
http://patft.uspto.g....S=PN/7,175,859. Oben is the "inventor" and Gateway Health Alliances is the assignee. Apparently Oben and Gateway Health Alliances have been working together since as early as 2000.
In 2006, Oben published a similar study "The use of a Cissus quadrangularis formulation in the management of weight loss and metabolic syndrome". In that study he used a different product from Gateway Health Alliances called Cylaris. It was a mixture of several ingredients including cissus. Of course, it had amazing results, results that Gateway Health Alliances relies on heavily in their marketing:
http://www.cylarisweightloss.com/ This doesn't mean that Oben's research is necessarily bogus, but can you tell me why an American corporation is having an obscure university in a poor West African country do all the research on their products, while simultaneously employing the lead researcher? Smells like bad fish to me.
Further, how reputable is "Lipids in Health and Disease", the journal that these were studies were published in? From
a dispute about Cylaris: Quote: The challenger also informed ERSP that studies were published only in an online journal and its description as a "peer reviewed journal" is highly circumspect due to its anonymous, on-line submission of potential peer reviewers, the significant processing fee and the relatively short time (i.e., 50 days) between submission to a journal and publication. Some things to think about.