The imminst page is really slow lately, anybody has the same problem ? If so, any special reason for the decrease in speed ?
LongeCityAdvocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans
Imminst page very slowwwwwwwww.w.w...w....w...w
Started by
drmz
, Jan 21 2009 09:49 AM
12 replies to this topic
#2
-
- Guest
- 16,276 posts
- 2,000 ₮
- Location:Philadelphia
Posted 21 January 2009 - 09:55 AM
Yes, I noticed it too. It was incredibly slow for a while, but it seems to have cleared up. I wonder how much of the slowness is under our control via tuning the forum software/adware, and how much is related to other loads on the server? This recent severe slowness was an anomaly, but the forum performance is frequently not as good as it should be.The imminst page is really slow lately, anybody has the same problem ? If so, any special reason for the decrease in speed ?
#6
-
- Life Member, Guardian
- 8,116 posts
- 242 ₮
- Location:Northern, Western Hemisphere of Earth, Usually of late, New York
- ✔
Posted 21 January 2009 - 01:39 PM
For the record those who want to throw more crap at Obama may have a case in blaming him for some of yesterday's slowness across the entire internet.
http://www.sfgate.co.../BU0P15DOF5.DTL
The fact is that the US infrastructure for the internet is another example of ignored, antiquated and dilapidated infrastructure that may be up for renewal under this administration.
Here is an interesting Internet Traffic site that may provide an objective measure for when it is Imminst and when it is systemic.
http://www.internett...rica.htm#graphs
As for what we can do about it, we have upgraded software, we are developing a webmaster position for oversight we can consider a different server though we have benefited from the present relationship, and we have already accomplished a lot to make it better.
http://www.sfgate.co.../BU0P15DOF5.DTL
The fact is that the US infrastructure for the internet is another example of ignored, antiquated and dilapidated infrastructure that may be up for renewal under this administration.
Here is an interesting Internet Traffic site that may provide an objective measure for when it is Imminst and when it is systemic.
http://www.internett...rica.htm#graphs
As for what we can do about it, we have upgraded software, we are developing a webmaster position for oversight we can consider a different server though we have benefited from the present relationship, and we have already accomplished a lot to make it better.
#7
-
- Guest
- 645 posts
- 1 ₮
- Location:Queens, NY
Posted 21 January 2009 - 09:53 PM
Hehe, I'm sorry, I just found this humorous. "What do you plan to do?" Answer: "I would do something." Well said.Directors up for election: what do you plan to do? Personally, if I were elected I would do something to impove the situation.
#8
-
- Life Member, Director, Moderator, Treasurer
- 19,047 posts
- 2,003 ₮
- Location:Wausau, WI
- ✔
Posted 21 January 2009 - 09:58 PM
Lightowl looked at server CPU usage and found that was not the problem, only maxing out at 45% on any particular days. Other members have offered ideas on how to fix things, but directors have to approve access to admin/server areas of Imminst....can't just let anyone go in and have access to operation and everyone's data.
#9
-
- Life Member, Director, Moderator, Treasurer
- 19,047 posts
- 2,003 ₮
- Location:Wausau, WI
- ✔
Posted 21 January 2009 - 10:10 PM
I feel your pain. Since I generally spend 2 to 4 hours at the site everyday, I notice the slow loading at times. I have contacted Thor once again to try a few new things to get the site running faster.
#10
-
- Guest
- 2,491 posts
- -103 ₮
- Location:Atlanta, GA
Posted 21 January 2009 - 11:41 PM
I'm perfectly confident I could figure out how to make this website not be so slow if I had the access to do it.Hehe, I'm sorry, I just found this humorous. "What do you plan to do?" Answer: "I would do something." Well said.Directors up for election: what do you plan to do? Personally, if I were elected I would do something to impove the situation.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
