original thread
read the original thread before voting... as of now my vote will be going for 1100iu but ill wait for discussions before actually voting.
Posted 05 November 2009 - 01:12 AM
Posted 05 November 2009 - 09:58 AM
original thread
read the original thread before voting... as of now my vote will be going for 1100iu but ill wait for discussions before actually voting.
Posted 05 November 2009 - 10:08 AM
Edited by Pike, 05 November 2009 - 10:11 AM.
Posted 05 November 2009 - 10:39 AM
i accidentally voted for 1000, but intended to vote 1100. so, move one 1000-IU vote to 1100.
i vote 1100 because that's the dose the literature for all-cause cancer reduction supports.
edit: in all reality, though, i think the dose we use in this is largely for aesthetic purposes because just by taking a walk on a sunny morning increases d-vitamin levels about as much as a high potency supplement, if not more.
Posted 05 November 2009 - 03:34 PM
Posted 05 November 2009 - 04:50 PM
Note to self: Take more walks naked. You'll save 80 cents a month AND be amused.
Posted 05 November 2009 - 08:22 PM
Note to self: Take more walks naked. You'll save 80 cents a month AND be amused.
Are you in the US ?
Welcome to the wonderful amusing world of the sex offender registry.
Posted 07 December 2009 - 12:22 AM
It looks like a majority of voters (54% right now) want more than 11001100 is good. My guess is this recommendation will come up a bit as more data comes in. But for now its the best amount.
Posted 07 December 2009 - 04:16 PM
Posted 09 December 2009 - 12:03 AM
Why such odd amounts??? (1100 and 1200)
A much better poll would have had these choices:
<1000
1000-1500
2000-3500
4000-5500
6000-7500
8000-9500
10,000
>10,000
(I take 10,000 daily.)
Posted 09 December 2009 - 10:33 AM
It's very hard to say what's best for the majority of people due to variables such as location, skin colour, sunning habits, metabolism, weight, existing illness etc. I take 10k as well. 5000IU is probably the best worldwide median estimate.Why such odd amounts??? (1100 and 1200)
A much better poll would have had these choices:
<1000
1000-1500
2000-3500
4000-5500
6000-7500
8000-9500
10,000
>10,000
(I take 10,000 daily.)
I'd like to see something in the 2ks included, that's going to be best for the majority of people.
Posted 09 December 2009 - 01:36 PM
Agreed, I would like to see between 2k-3kI'd like to see something in the 2ks included, that's going to be best for the majority of people.
Posted 09 December 2009 - 04:42 PM
Edited by kismet, 09 December 2009 - 04:43 PM.
Posted 10 December 2009 - 10:37 PM
Posted 11 December 2009 - 12:06 AM
At least. 6k might be even betterAgreed, I would like to see between 2k-3kI'd like to see something in the 2ks included, that's going to be best for the majority of people.
Posted 11 December 2009 - 12:19 AM
Posted 12 December 2009 - 06:03 AM
I have a good diet so I would not take the full dose every day....because? (sorry if that spoils all the fun )
Posted 26 April 2010 - 06:13 PM
Posted 26 April 2010 - 08:36 PM
Why such odd amounts??? (1100 and 1200)
A much better poll would have had these choices:
<1000
1000-1500
2000-3500
4000-5500
6000-7500
8000-9500
10,000
>10,000
(I take 10,000 daily.)
Posted 15 July 2010 - 04:49 AM
Posted 20 October 2010 - 04:15 AM
It's been over a year now. I've settled into 5000 iu D3 a day. I have to say it seems like D3 does more for me than everything else combined. It's been over a year since I caught a cold or flu. I went through this years Chinese New Year without getting the flu for the first time in many years. In the whole school only myself, and one other person remained well. At least half the school was sick at any given time.
Posted 20 October 2010 - 04:46 AM
10K IU would send my levels to the moon. I've tested several times, and 2000 IU of an oil-based formulation plus 660 IU of dry (as part of a multi-component product) gets me to 53 ng/ml. People are all over the map on bioavailability of D3, plus we can have widely varying body weight and composition. Are you using an oil-based or a dry formulation? The dry ones are notorious for poor absorption.Have the people commenting on levels had their levels checked, before and after Vit D supplementation?
I take 10,000 iu's per day, because it turned out 7500 IUs was not enough to get my levels above 45, which is where I want them for both longevity and anti-cancer effects supported in the literature. Granted, I stay out of the sun due to strong family hx skin cancer. But there is no chance that 2000 iu's is going to be harmful to anyone. I would have chosen 2000 iu's and let people supplement beyond that on their own... but Vit D will still require supplementation beyond this multi so there is no harm in a lower dose. My only point was that debating between 800 and 1100 iu's is irrelevant. Most people will need minimum 5000 iu's.
Posted 30 January 2012 - 10:39 AM
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users