• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In    
  • Create Account
  LongeCity
              Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans

Photo
- - - - -

Viagra and Cialis - Wow, awesome.


  • Please log in to reply
24 replies to this topic

#1 Ben

  • Guest
  • 2,005 posts
  • -4
  • Location:South East

Posted 21 January 2011 - 01:07 PM


Probably not the best first post in over a month, perhaps two, but there you are.

As per the title of the topic, and its description, I'm a young man that has been using viagra and cialis recently- experimentally. I'll go through my thoughts on each below:

Viagra: Wow, all I need is half a tablet and suddenly I've something that more resembles a stage prop from some 70's farce rather than a body part. Incredible. Rock hardness at will. The sensation and confidence boost is excellent. I believe there's some kind of ejaculatory delay effect; may be imagining this though. All up, super powerful erections, and my baseline, which I'm using as a comparison, isn't too shabby either.

Cialis: This had a noticeable effect on me for around 48 hours. The first time I took it I experienced moderate pain in my lower back- one of the common side effects; I found though that even at very high doses the effect was not as strong as viagra.

#2 Rational Madman

  • Guest
  • 1,295 posts
  • 489
  • Location:District of Columbia

Posted 21 January 2011 - 11:00 PM

Probably not the best first post in over a month, perhaps two, but there you are.

As per the title of the topic, and its description, I'm a young man that has been using viagra and cialis recently- experimentally. I'll go through my thoughts on each below:

Viagra: Wow, all I need is half a tablet and suddenly I've something that more resembles a stage prop from some 70's farce rather than a body part. Incredible. Rock hardness at will. The sensation and confidence boost is excellent. I believe there's some kind of ejaculatory delay effect; may be imagining this though. All up, super powerful erections, and my baseline, which I'm using as a comparison, isn't too shabby either.

Cialis: This had a noticeable effect on me for around 48 hours. The first time I took it I experienced moderate pain in my lower back- one of the common side effects; I found though that even at very high doses the effect was not as strong as viagra.


As you noted, and due in large part to the role that each agent plays in cAMP degradation, they can exert effects on cognition and anxiety that vary between subtle and acute. And at the risk of portraying myself in a poor light, I confess that I noticed these effects during a period of using the services of expensive escorts in New York, whom because of their beauty and sexual prowess, can be quite intimidating. Incidentally, I have seen some research where a treatment value was noted in Alzheimer's Disease models, but because of the indication of the drugs, the level of research interest has been somewhat tepid.

Edited by Rol82, 22 January 2011 - 01:12 AM.

  • like x 1
  • dislike x 1

#3 maxwatt

  • Guest, Moderator LeadNavigator
  • 4,941 posts
  • 1,615
  • Location:New York

Posted 21 January 2011 - 11:29 PM

Probably not the best first post in over a month, perhaps two, but there you are.

As per the title of the topic, and its description, I'm a young man that has been using viagra and cialis recently- experimentally. I'll go through my thoughts on each below:

Viagra: Wow, all I need is half a tablet and suddenly I've something that more resembles a stage prop from some 70's farce rather than a body part. Incredible. Rock hardness at will. The sensation and confidence boost is excellent. I believe there's some kind of ejaculatory delay effect; may be imagining this though. All up, super powerful erections, and my baseline, which I'm using as a comparison, isn't too shabby either.

Cialis: This had a noticeable effect on me for around 48 hours. The first time I took it I experienced moderate pain in my lower back- one of the common side effects; I found though that even at very high doses the effect was not as strong as viagra.


As you noted, and due in large part to the role that each agent plays in cAMP degradation, they can exert effects on cognition and anxiety that vary between subtle and acute. And at the risk of portraying myself in a poor light, I confess that I noticed this effect during a period of using the services of expensive escorts in New York, whom because of their beauty and sexual prowess, can be quite intimidating. Incidentally, I have seen some research where a treatment value was noted in Alzheimer's Disease models, but because of the indication of the drugs, the level of research interest has been somewhat tepid.

PM me their contact numbers, would you? ;)

More seriously, if you have an erection lasting more than four hours it is a medical emergency. It cuts off the blood supply to the affected organ which can necessitate amputation.

Edited by maxwatt, 21 January 2011 - 11:47 PM.


#4 Ben

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 2,005 posts
  • -4
  • Location:South East

Posted 25 January 2011 - 09:09 AM

...at the risk of portraying myself in a poor light, I confess that I noticed these effects during a period of using the services of expensive escorts in New York, whom because of their beauty and sexual prowess, can be quite intimidating.

No poor light at all, I'm hugely impressed! :)

Mmm, the idea of splitting a pricey New York professional whore in half with some Viagra is a really lovely image...

if you have an erection lasting more than four hours it is a medical emergency. It cuts off the blood supply to the affected organ which can necessitate amputation.

....no, wait, nevermind.

#5 Rational Madman

  • Guest
  • 1,295 posts
  • 489
  • Location:District of Columbia

Posted 26 January 2011 - 12:48 AM

...at the risk of portraying myself in a poor light, I confess that I noticed these effects during a period of using the services of expensive escorts in New York, whom because of their beauty and sexual prowess, can be quite intimidating.

No poor light at all, I'm hugely impressed! :)

Mmm, the idea of splitting a pricey New York professional whore in half with some Viagra is a really lovely image...

if you have an erection lasting more than four hours it is a medical emergency. It cuts off the blood supply to the affected organ which can necessitate amputation.

....no, wait, nevermind.

I wouldn't refer to them as whores, because that conjures the image of a street walker, which these women are not even remotely close to resembling. And if you treat them like whores, you'll find your appointment or relationship promptly terminated, or your name on a blacklist that many of escorts keep amongst themselves---they really take advantage of social networking applications. Because of the popular image of the industry, perhaps I should make some effort to dispel false notions promoted by feminists and religious puritans. So let me offer the following points that have formed my impression of the industry:

1. Most that bother to advertise their services or maintain a website charge a minimum of $300 an hour, with some of the non-porn star escorts charging up to $4000 an hour. Forget backpage.com, look for the best on Eros.com.
2. Most have at least a bachelor's degree of education, or are otherwise very intelligent.
3. Most set strict parameters that must be adhered to during appointments: like no S&M, no Greek, no CIM, no kissing, and during the actual appointment, no discussion of the contractual arrangement or the money exchanged---excuse my vulgarity.
4. Higher class escorts invariably require extensive screening, which can entail filling out a formal application, providing references, sometimes signing a non-disclosure agreement, using identity protecting software, meeting for an interview or non-sexual date, and extensively corresponding via phone and e-mail. So consequentially, a significant number of candidates get turned down.
5. Most are independent, but even with agency escorts, the compensation arrangement is quite fair---usually 50/50, minus agency incurred expenses.
6. Higher class escorts are often interested in meaningful relationships with a select few gentlemen, not one shot affairs. And with this class of escorts, they usually see only a handful of gentlemen each week.
7. The preferred duration of appointments is four hours, and typically doesn't just involve sex, but dinner, drinks, conversation, theater, movies, or any number of social attractions on the calendar.
8. The best escorts in the world will be found in one of three meccas: New York, London, or the greater Los Angeles area.
9. Many capitalize on their careers as models and actresses, but however, don't always provide a service that meets the price for their services. So it's important to read reviews published on the Zagat of the industry, The Erotic Review. But some of the best prohibit the publishing of reviews, so sometimes you have to rely on the word of mouth reputation.
10. Finally, using an escort shouldn't be a source of shame, because many of these women don't live up to the popular cliched image of desperate, drug abusing, nymphomaniac, and psychologically scarred women. They after all, earn an income often greatly exceeding that of members of the most celebrated profession in societies---so they're usually not in an economically delicate situation. And because of the contractual conditions and discretion of escorts, it often feels more like dating, and not a sordidly cheap affair. Indeed, the better providers are brilliant at creating the illusion that you're a boyfriend, and often times, their feelings are to varying degrees genuine---because after all, they're highly sexual beings that enjoy their careers. And it's not unprecedented for an escort to pursue a private romantic relationship with the clients, but this is something that should proceed only at the provider's suggestion, of course, because their prices have a basis in the fantasy they indulge. Because of the price range, though, their services are affordable to most, so I highly suggest that just about everyone roll the dice and try using the services of a classy escort at least once in their life.

Anyway, I understand if the navigators decide to either delete or edit this entry, because I realize that I'm probably in violation of the terms of use of agreement. So whatever happens, there will be no hard feelings. I just sensed that there's probably some level of interest, but for varied reasons, many are unfortunately reluctant to move to the next step.

Edited by Rol82, 27 January 2011 - 02:26 AM.


#6 chris w

  • Guest
  • 740 posts
  • 261
  • Location:Cracow, Poland

Posted 26 January 2011 - 11:35 PM

Wow,

Higher class escorts invariably require extensive screening, which can entail filling out a formal application, providing references, sometimes signing a non-disclosure agreement, using identity protecting software, meeting for an interview or non-sexual date, and extensively corresponding via phone and e-mail. So consequentially, a significant number of candidates get turned down.


Sounds like much pain in the ass, if I ever got turned down after "extensive screeing" ( I mean... filling out an application ? That's just surreal ) by a woman who gets paid for sexual encounters which, in the end, makes her a prostitute no matter how they choose to call themselves, I'd feel a British Petroleum magnitude of shame. I think I'll stick with the more down to earth, prole Daughters of Corintus for the time being, thank you.

You describe someone who fully enjoys the power an attractive woman has over a man ( being the chooser and making him jump the hoop ), AND makes a living out of it, that has to seriosuly corrupt a person in the long run, talk about entitlement complex. I say a princess whore is still a whore, sorry.

Edited by chris w, 26 January 2011 - 11:37 PM.

  • like x 2

#7 Ben

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 2,005 posts
  • -4
  • Location:South East

Posted 27 January 2011 - 01:11 AM

I don't know about that Rol, I think I'd still classify these women as whores.

My definition of a whore: A woman that is paid money primarily to have sex with men, there being an implied or explicit understanding that this is the main purpose of the engagement.

I'd say it fits your classy whores.

The info. though on the scene is interesting, but cut the issue any where you like and the relationship is still abusive one (the Johns being the abusers that is.) Being a whore a carries a stigma as the majority of public opinion is against it and there cannot not be a loss of dignity as a result of the acts performed in return for shallow financial gain, or a few extra baubles and trinkets. A need undoubtedly created by the influence of a shallow and heavily consumerist society.
  • like x 2

#8 Rational Madman

  • Guest
  • 1,295 posts
  • 489
  • Location:District of Columbia

Posted 27 January 2011 - 01:25 AM

Wow,

Higher class escorts invariably require extensive screening, which can entail filling out a formal application, providing references, sometimes signing a non-disclosure agreement, using identity protecting software, meeting for an interview or non-sexual date, and extensively corresponding via phone and e-mail. So consequentially, a significant number of candidates get turned down.


Sounds like much pain in the ass, if I ever got turned down after "extensive screeing" ( I mean... filling out an application ? That's just surreal ) by a woman who gets paid for sexual encounters which, in the end, makes her a prostitute no matter how they choose to call themselves, I'd feel a British Petroleum magnitude of shame. I think I'll stick with the more down to earth, prole Daughters of Corintus for the time being, thank you.

You describe someone who fully enjoys the power an attractive woman has over a man ( being the chooser and making him jump the hoop ), AND makes a living out of it, that has to seriosuly corrupt a person in the long run, talk about entitlement complex. I say a princess whore is still a whore, sorry.


Well, with the Emperor's Club VIP and Deborah Jeanne Palfrey busts, members of the industry are taking greater precautions. But for the most part, security measures don't extend far beyond requiring references. Higher in the stratosphere, though, it's a different story. And in my opinion, securing the services of an escort pales in comparison to the psychological and financial costs that are often incurred in traditional courtship and romance---especially the Park Avenue types. So many find it to be a refreshing respite from walking though minefields, and an excellent opportunity to fulfill fantasies that can be sometimes difficult to realize. Anyway, I think it might be more appropriate to take this discussion to the private messenger, because this topic is pretty ill-fitting for this messageboard.

Edited by Rol82, 27 January 2011 - 01:34 AM.


#9 Rational Madman

  • Guest
  • 1,295 posts
  • 489
  • Location:District of Columbia

Posted 27 January 2011 - 01:28 AM

I don't know about that Rol, I think I'd still classify these women as whores.

My definition of a whore: A woman that is paid money primarily to have sex with men, there being an implied or explicit understanding that this is the main purpose of the engagement.

I'd say it fits your classy whores.

The info. though on the scene is interesting, but cut the issue any where you like and the relationship is still abusive one (the Johns being the abusers that is.) Being a whore a carries a stigma as the majority of public opinion is against it and there cannot not be a loss of dignity as a result of the acts performed in return for shallow financial gain, or a few extra baubles and trinkets. A need undoubtedly created by the influence of a shallow and heavily consumerist society.


Well, I was never suggesting that it's an ennobling profession, but at the same time, I don't think it's deserving of the level of contempt that it is subjected to by critics.

Edited by Rol82, 27 January 2011 - 01:30 AM.


#10 rwac

  • Member
  • 4,764 posts
  • 60
  • Location:Dimension X

Posted 27 January 2011 - 01:33 AM

I don't think it's deserving of the level of contempt that it is subjected to by critics.


It's not.
They're fulfilling a need, same as the bootleggers during prohibition.

#11 niner

  • Guest
  • 16,276 posts
  • 2,000
  • Location:Philadelphia

Posted 27 January 2011 - 01:56 AM

3. Most set strict parameters that must be adhered to during appointments: like no S&M, no Greek, no CIM, no kissing...

Wow. No kissing? Hmm. I wouldn't have expected that. So what are we paying for, again?

#12 Rational Madman

  • Guest
  • 1,295 posts
  • 489
  • Location:District of Columbia

Posted 27 January 2011 - 01:59 AM

3. Most set strict parameters that must be adhered to during appointments: like no S&M, no Greek, no CIM, no kissing...

Wow. No kissing? Hmm. I wouldn't have expected that. So what are we paying for, again?


Well, the parameters aren't uniform, of course. And at least in my experience, kissing wasn't a problem.

#13 maxwatt

  • Guest, Moderator LeadNavigator
  • 4,941 posts
  • 1,615
  • Location:New York

Posted 27 January 2011 - 03:28 AM

These women are not whores, though they sleep with men for money.

There are distinctions in the oldest profession, perhaps in an ascending scale: whore, street-walker, hooker, prostitute, call-girl, escort, courtesan, Geisha. Street-walkers include those women near the Lincoln Tunnel who'll hop in your car and give you a blow job. Some of them are transvestites. Rol's encounter seems somewhat above the call-girl, at the escort level. I met one such lady in a non-professional context. She was working her way through medical school, eventually married another doctor. I can only imagine how her knowledge of anatomy contributed to the satisfaction of her clients.

Back to Cialis vs. Viagra: Cialis does seem to be longer lasting, and less intense. As it is not a PDE6 inhibitor, it does not cause the occasional side effect of blue-tinged and blurry vision. However, it does block other PDE enzymes that are muscle relaxants and so commonly causes backache that can last for 36 hours. You can get a free sample of Cialis if you have a prescription and are a first time user,(google for it) either the traditional dose, or a low dose every-day Cialis that is supposed to have a cumulative effect, so one is always ready like the commercials imply. The dose is low enough to not cause back ache, but it takes three or four days to have an effect. This is probably why they are giving Cialis away, most men want the immediate performance rush Viagra gives, and Cialis are trying to win customers. If a middle aged man wants to be always ready to bang like a bunny, I suppose this works. Viagra takes about an hour to take effect, and lasts for perhaps three. Women tend to like the extended foreplay this entails. Much of the Viagra sold on the internet is counterfeit, though it may contain a low dose of real Viagra. I believe legitimate Viagra will cost around $20 a pill. Though price is no guarantee, anything less and you can be sure it is a fraud.

There are so-called herbal Viagras, usually Epimedium (Horney Goat Weed) and a few other things, but they basically do not work: none is a PDE5 inhibitor. There is however a weak PDE5 inhibitor extractable from certain herbs, which is non-toxic enough that a sufficiently large dose to have a stiffening effect is possible. Tests are ongoing. In the meantime take your zinc supplements, and dine on wine and oysters when you take your escort to dinner.

----
A brief diversion:

Three English Dons at a British University were strolling through the University town one day, and chanced to pass the local house of ill-repute. The full professor mused aloud: "we have collective nouns for many creatures, as in a 'pride of lions', a 'troop of baboons', or a 'bevy of quail', but isn't it curious we have no such word for these ladies of the night."

The assistant professor, hoping to impress his superiors with his wit, thought a moment and said "I propose we call them 'a queen of tarts.'"

The full professor, not wishing to be upstaged, thought a bit as they continued their stroll, then announced: "Wouldn't it be more appropriate to refer to them as 'a flurry of strumpets?'"

The Dean of the department realized that if he did not wish to be shown up by his underlings, he must top their suggestions. As they walked in silence one could almost see by his furrowed brow, his determined gaze and the way he clenched his pipe between his teeth, that he was thinking furiously. At last he stopped, took the pipe from his lips and said: "Gentlemen, it should be obvious. What we have here is 'An Anthology of English Pros.'"
  • like x 1

#14 Ben

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 2,005 posts
  • -4
  • Location:South East

Posted 27 January 2011 - 03:15 PM

I don't know about that Rol, I think I'd still classify these women as whores.


Well, I was never suggesting that it's an ennobling profession, but at the same time, I don't think it's deserving of the level of contempt that it is subjected to by critics.

Hmm, perhaps various individuals don't deserve the criticism; overall though I support the stigma and the general negative attitude towards it as it's not good for societal harmony.



...in my opinion, securing the services of an escort pales in comparison to the psychological and financial costs that are often incurred in traditional courtship and romance---especially the Park Avenue types. So many find it to be a refreshing respite from walking though minefields...

That's a darn good point. I read the list of requirements and didn't think any were over the top with this in mind.

Anyone who's ever dated vacuous "glams" (as we call them down here) will be able to sympathise hugely.



Back to Cialis vs. Viagra: Cialis does seem to be longer lasting, and less intense.

Yeah definitely wasn't imaginig that. Though the Ranbaxy I had was weaker than the prop. stuff at one point.



Viagra takes about an hour to take effect, and lasts for perhaps three. Women tend to like the extended foreplay this entails.

Can't see much benefit the Cialis has over the V. I'll probably just stick to the V.


Much of the Viagra sold on the internet is counterfeit, though it may contain a low dose of real Viagra. I believe legitimate Viagra will cost around $20 a pill. Though price is no guarantee, anything less and you can be sure it is a fraud.

Hmm, I had some Ranbaxy gold. It's a pretty big Indian pharma. co. Worked pretty well at least, though, could have indeed have been a weak dose or bound with something toxic in the tablet. I guess you can't really ever be certain.



A brief diversion:

Three English Dons at a British University were strolling through the University town one day, and chanced to pass the local house of ill-repute. The full professor mused aloud: "we have collective nouns for many creatures, as in a 'pride of lions', a 'troop of baboons', or a 'bevy of quail', but isn't it curious we have no such word for these ladies of the night."

The assistant professor, hoping to impress his superiors with his wit, thought a moment and said "I propose we call them 'a queen of tarts.'"

The full professor, not wishing to be upstaged, thought a bit as they continued their stroll, then announced: "Wouldn't it be more appropriate to refer to them as 'a flurry of strumpets?'"

The Dean of the department realized that if he did not wish to be shown up by his underlings, he must top their suggestions. As they walked in silence one could almost see by his furrowed brow, his determined gaze and the way he clenched his pipe between his teeth, that he was thinking furiously. At last he stopped, took the pipe from his lips and said: "Gentlemen, it should be obvious. What we have here is 'An Anthology of English Pros.'"

Hahahhahahahahahah.

#15 nowayout

  • Guest
  • 2,946 posts
  • 437
  • Location:Earth

Posted 28 January 2011 - 01:23 AM

These women are not whores, though they sleep with men for money.

There are distinctions in the oldest profession, perhaps in an ascending scale: whore, street-walker, hooker, prostitute, call-girl, escort, courtesan, Geisha. Street-walkers include those women near the Lincoln Tunnel who'll hop in your car and give you a blow job. Some of them are transvestites. Rol's encounter seems somewhat above the call-girl, at the escort level. I met one such lady in a non-professional context. She was working her way through medical school, eventually married another doctor. I can only imagine how her knowledge of anatomy contributed to the satisfaction of her clients.


So the ones who do it because they are dirt poor, or forced to, in any case trapped in exploitative circumstances, are whores. The ones who do it not out of need, but because they want to live the high life, aren't? :wacko:

Sounds like you have your cables crossed.
  • like x 1

#16 maxwatt

  • Guest, Moderator LeadNavigator
  • 4,941 posts
  • 1,615
  • Location:New York

Posted 28 January 2011 - 02:15 AM

These women are not whores, though they sleep with men for money.

There are distinctions in the oldest profession, perhaps in an ascending scale: whore, street-walker, hooker, prostitute, call-girl, escort, courtesan, Geisha. Street-walkers include those women near the Lincoln Tunnel who'll hop in your car and give you a blow job. Some of them are transvestites. Rol's encounter seems somewhat above the call-girl, at the escort level. I met one such lady in a non-professional context. She was working her way through medical school, eventually married another doctor. I can only imagine how her knowledge of anatomy contributed to the satisfaction of her clients.


So the ones who do it because they are dirt poor, or forced to, in any case trapped in exploitative circumstances, are whores. The ones who do it not out of need, but because they want to live the high life, aren't? :wacko:

Sounds like you have your cables crossed.

Do not be too literal, for all women in a sense are whores. But a more precise classification of the species is helpful.

#17 Ben

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 2,005 posts
  • -4
  • Location:South East

Posted 28 January 2011 - 02:28 AM

Do not be too literal, for all women in a sense are whores. But a more precise classification of the species is helpful.


That's a good point. Where do you draw the line?

Is this pouty Aussie failed-actress-slut a whore?:

Posted Image

(Man is twice her age and rich, though neither needed to be stated of course.)

I'm not sure.

Edit: Indeed, I've been in relationships that felt as if they were primarily commercial, with a similar exchange going on as that that would occur with a classy escort- even though we were "dating".

Edited by Ben - Aus, 28 January 2011 - 02:31 AM.


#18 chris w

  • Guest
  • 740 posts
  • 261
  • Location:Cracow, Poland

Posted 28 January 2011 - 05:51 PM

I don't know about that Rol, I think I'd still classify these women as whores.

Well, I was never suggesting that it's an ennobling profession, but at the same time, I don't think it's deserving of the level of contempt that it is subjected to by critics.

Hmm, perhaps various individuals don't deserve the criticism; overall though I support the stigma and the general negative attitude towards it as it's not good for societal harmony.


Actually, I think it is better for societal harmony simply given human nature - a married man looking for sex on the side may either take mistresses or visit prostitutes, the former is evidently more likely to break marriages, whores are a sort of no-drama-attached safety valves, some guys just come to them to bitch about their life problems and get stroked on the head ( well, at least so I hear ). Even St Augustine and St Thomas claimed prostitution has its place, that's gotta mean something, right ?



Do not be too literal, for all women in a sense are whores.


Into this notion I don't buy, there's certainly a fair share of those women ( and I know East Europe's gals often carry a gold digger opinion ), but I'm seeing definitely non-hipergamous relationships too ( and no, the guy isn't always that hot to make up for lack of financial prospects and doesn't play in a kick ass rock band either ), it does happen, just not in thousands. Don't tell me you actually don't believe in True Love, huh ? :laugh:

#19 nowayout

  • Guest
  • 2,946 posts
  • 437
  • Location:Earth

Posted 29 January 2011 - 03:35 AM

Do not be too literal, for all women in a sense are whores.


Maybe because with that attitude towards women, those are the only ones who will come within 500 feet of you. The "streetlight effect" then explains the rest. :-D

Edited by viveutvivas, 29 January 2011 - 03:39 AM.


#20 maxwatt

  • Guest, Moderator LeadNavigator
  • 4,941 posts
  • 1,615
  • Location:New York

Posted 29 January 2011 - 04:13 AM

Do not be too literal, for all women in a sense are whores.


Maybe because with that attitude towards women, those are the only ones who will come within 500 feet of you. The "streetlight effect" then explains the rest. :-D

Treat a lady like a whore, and treat a whore like a lady.



Getting back to Viagra and Cialis, a little research shows these PDE5 inhibitors are metabolized by CYP3A. Grapefruit juice, speciofically its constituens naringin and naringenin are very potent blockers of the action of CYP3A. Hence drinking grapefruit juice, or supplementing with naringin cab be expected to increase the potency and duration of effect of these drugs.

#21 niner

  • Guest
  • 16,276 posts
  • 2,000
  • Location:Philadelphia

Posted 29 January 2011 - 05:12 AM

Do not be too literal, for all women in a sense are whores. But a more precise classification of the species is helpful.

I suspect you had something in mind like women not sleeping with guys unless they "get something", as in "help me raise the kids" or "protect me from the guy in the cave next door". But then by that standard, most men might be a little whorish themselves.

There are a couple different kinds of relationships that I've seen examples of recently: The first is the classic "woman is very hot looking, doesn't work, and is married to a guy with a lot of money". Some might see some degree of whorishness in that. Then there's a new kind that I'm seeing more and more; a relationship where the woman makes more money than the guy. I know of quite a lot of these, actually. Of the ones that I'm aware of, in only one case is the guy distinctly better looking than the woman. Usually they tend to be pretty "well matched", looks-wise. So, are these guys whores? I'd say not, based on what I know about the people involved. And what of the women in the first kind of relationship? Are they whores? Again, I'd have to say no. I see them working hard to raise families while putting up with their husbands' various issues. There is definitely something going on in mate selection though. Men seem to be able to attract hot looking women with money and power, while women don't seem to do the same thing when they have the money and power. I'm not sure they couldn't buy a boy-toy if they were so inclined, but in my circle, they don't seem to want to.

#22 rwac

  • Member
  • 4,764 posts
  • 60
  • Location:Dimension X

Posted 29 January 2011 - 05:22 AM

There is definitely something going on in mate selection though. Men seem to be able to attract hot looking women with money and power, while women don't seem to do the same thing when they have the money and power. I'm not sure they couldn't buy a boy-toy if they were so inclined, but in my circle, they don't seem to want to.


Generally speaking, men are attracted to youth and beauty, women are attracted to status, especially men with higher status than themselves.
  • Agree x 2

#23 Keizo

  • Guest
  • 402 posts
  • 27
  • Location:Sweden
  • NO

Posted 21 December 2015 - 01:55 PM

Does anyone have a clear idea as to how bad sildenafil is for fertility? I did read some study suggesting it has a negative impact on testicular function but another not so. 

 



#24 Bingaman

  • Guest
  • 5 posts
  • 2
  • Location:.

Posted 18 January 2018 - 09:51 AM

Sorry for bumping, I just want to share my 2 cents worth. For me personally, Viagra gives a higher quality, fuller erection than Cialis does. But the extra hours of activity that Cialis lasts make it sometimes the more convenient ED alternative.
viwow.jpg

#25 dazed1

  • Guest
  • 302 posts
  • 3
  • Location:/
  • NO

Posted 01 September 2019 - 11:59 PM

Sorry for bumping, I just want to share my 2 cents worth. For me personally, Viagra gives a higher quality, fuller erection than Cialis does. But the extra hours of activity that Cialis lasts make it sometimes the more convenient ED alternative.
viwow.jpg

 

Is this site safe/fake? anyone can help?




2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users