5 replies to this topic

[rainbowmaker]

That is, a sub-forum on:
1. Purity issues and suppliers;
2. Experience reports/Product reviews; and
3. General nootropic discussion

[todd_lee]

I guess that would avoid nearly every thread ending in nootropi's dramatic discussion of purity issues. Although, too many sub-forums might be cumbersome. I think a single thread on purity would suffice.

[hyoomen]

I suppose it could be vaguely beneficial, but I do not believe that traffic on this board in anyway warrants such divisions. If we had 40 or more threads being created a day, I could certainly see it. Since there are so few threads, though, it seems like a lot more clicking and cross-linking would be necessary.

Perhaps a better proposition would be the advent of thread subject indicators ("[purity]: Watch out stuff from Bob's Big Brain Blobs"; "[stack report]: OMG THIS STUFF MAKES ME MORE SMARTER"; "[general]: monkeys eating nootropics like their bananas more yellow, says CNN"). Even this, however, seems a trifle unnecessary.

I do believe a list of such indicators (or even radio options) at time of thread creation would be useful if such a program was implemented. People would be a lot more likely to follow such conventions if they were easily accessible.

Just some .02.

[nootropi]

I will now only defer to other posts. I have already presented my case fully in these earlier posts.

[todd_lee]

[lol]
[thumb] Good thinking hyoomen.

[pinballwizard]

I don't think this matters. The search engine and the mouse pretty much allows you to read whatever you want.