Another paper on telomere shortening:
http://the-scientist...-axis-of-aging/
http://f1000.com/897...78ntc705nlzkbp5
The problem is you have to pay $32 for the actual paper.
Once you have the paper, the question becomes, "What is the mechanism that actually causes telomere shortening and how does it work for tissues of different turn over (cell replication periods) rates?".
Its also the chicken and the egg. Does telomere shortening cause mitochondrial dysfunction? Or does mitochondrial dysfunction cause telomere shortening (like I think)?
It is the failure to answer these questions that make telomere shortening theory as a cause aging dubious to me.
My questions for you guys are:
1) Can any of you get this paper for free?
2) Can you answer my questions above?
I couldn't find the paper but I can answer your questions. The mechanism of telomere shortening is VERY well understood. It has to do with DNA replication. If you look at a basic diagram of the double helix being replicated (
http://www.accessexc...llaboration.jpg) you can see that there are two strands, the leading and the lagging strand. You see the DNA polymerase that makes DNA can only synthesize new nucleotides in the 5' to 3' direction of DNA. The leading strand is replicated completely because it is complementary to the direction that DNA polymerase synthesizes in. However the lagging strand is not complementary. In order to compensate for this the DNA is synthesized in short chunks called Okasaki fragments. Basically an RNA primer is laid out next to each Okasaki fragment, DNA polymerase then binds to this primer and replicates the Okasaki fragment. HOWEVER, because the primer must be placed before each fragment it is impossible to place one at the ends of the DNA because there isn't anymore DNA to place RNA primers on. This means every time DNA is replicated we lose a bit of our DNA. Luckily the ends of the DNA are filled with repeating telomeres rather than vital information. However we still lose telomeres every time our DNA is replicated. Now the rate of telomere loss in a cell is proportional to how often that cell divides since DNA is only replicated during cell division. So we lose telomeres faster in tissue types that divide often (ie skin) and more slowly in tissue types that seldom divide (ie nerves).
Now your second question about mitochondrial dysfunction. Telomere shortening DOES NOT cause mitochondrial dysfunction. You see mitochondria actually have their own set of DNA. Unlike chromosomal DNA this DNA is circular and not linear. Because it is circular it is possible to completely replicate it when the mitochondria divides. Therefore mitochondria don't even need telomeres since they aren't losing DNA when they divide. However it is possible that changes in the chromosomal DNA could effect the bodies mitochondria and that these changes could be brought on by telomere shortening, but I don't know for sure. I think it's far more likely that mutations in mitochondrial DNA are the main cause of problems associated with them. Oh and mitochondrial dysfunction certainly DOES NOT cause telomere shortening (as explained in the answer to your first question this is caused by the replicated of chromosomal DNA). So it really isn't a case of the chicken or the egg since the two aren't related.
Edited by 1101, 25 June 2011 - 07:43 PM.