Some super antioxidant has been developed that is 100 times stronger than vit. E does anyone know more about this?
Super antioxidant?
#1
Posted 20 January 2005 - 11:21 AM
Some super antioxidant has been developed that is 100 times stronger than vit. E does anyone know more about this?
#2
Posted 20 January 2005 - 03:29 PM
#3
Posted 20 January 2005 - 07:09 PM
#4
Posted 20 January 2005 - 07:16 PM
Astaxanthin, considered to also be around 10 times more powerful than vitamin A. I take 400 mg a day.
Is this a 2% compound like BAC sells?
#5
Posted 20 January 2005 - 08:11 PM
Here is the exact brand I am taking: http://www.vitacost....611&bt=products . I bought about a dozen bottles a few months ago and expect to not have to buy any more for a while. What do you think? I thought the price was right when I bought them but perhaps there are mitigating factors such as bioavailability or new products of which I am unaware. Any further disclosure of my ignorance in such matters would be appreciated. [lol]
Chip
#6
Posted 20 January 2005 - 08:30 PM
#8
Posted 21 January 2005 - 03:15 PM
#9
Posted 21 January 2005 - 07:29 PM
lynx, how might I get those papers from you. Are they in electronic form? PM me maybe. TIA
Chip
#10
Posted 21 January 2005 - 08:29 PM
I am looking for the papers.
Morelife.org has some really good arguments for the superiority of nTBHA over PBN.
#11
Posted 22 January 2005 - 09:11 AM
#12
Posted 22 January 2005 - 09:19 AM
#13
Posted 22 January 2005 - 04:21 PM
How about not using cryptic combinations of letters and instead write the full names so everyone could understand what you are talking about?
Because people who are familiar with free radical research use the abbreviations out of convenience.
#14
Posted 04 March 2006 - 05:22 PM
The relation to R-lipoic acid can only be indirectly ascertained, in that Ames used PBN/ALCAR combos and got the same results as R-ALA/ALCAR. nTBHA is one possible metabolite of PBN. nTBHA has shown similar mitochondrial metabolism improvement to PBN and R-ALA.
I am looking for the papers.
Morelife.org has some really good arguments for the superiority of nTBHA over PBN.
I know that is an old thread but i had it bookmarked
Can someone post some papers/references links to nTBHA?
#15
Posted 04 March 2006 - 05:30 PM
#16
Posted 04 March 2006 - 05:47 PM
If I am looking for a strong antioxidant, should I use its ORAC value to determine the strongest ?
the problem using only the orac scale, is that antioxidents become oxidized! lol. google about 'free radical cascades'
look for multiple antioxidents that work in complex... E complex + C + r-ala, NAC + C, etc etc
or antioxidents that dont become potent free radicals after oxidation like CoQ10(although coq10 is super expensive, there are others i just cant remember).
herbal antioxident complexs that have other health benefits are good... ie: full spectrum green tea or berry extracts.
#17
Posted 04 March 2006 - 06:30 PM
#18
Posted 04 March 2006 - 06:30 PM
#19
Posted 04 March 2006 - 06:30 PM
#20
Posted 04 March 2006 - 07:00 PM
#21
Posted 05 March 2006 - 01:17 PM
http://www.nowfoods....l&item_id=43852
refs:
Y. Kong, et al., Korea Cancer Center Hospital, “Influence of an orally effective superoxide dismutase (GLISODin)® on strenuous exercise-induced changes of blood antioxidant enzymes and plasma lactate” AACC Poster, Presented July 2004
Free Radic Res. 2004 Sep;38(9):927-32. Influence of an orally effective SOD on hyperbaric oxygen-related cell damage. Muth CM, Glenz Y, Klaus M, Radermacher P, Speit G, Leverve X. Sektion Anasthesiologische Pathophysiologie und Verfahrensentwicklung, Universitatsklinikum Ulm, D-89073 Ulm, Germany. PMID: 15621710 [PubMed - in process]
#22
Posted 05 March 2006 - 03:54 PM
Ok, who said so? How much was the oxidative stress before they started and how much was it after the study? Glisodin is never very clear about this. Why do they not do a peer review human study proving it reduces oxidative stress?
For that mattter, why doesn't any manufacture of anti-oxidants do a peer review human study proving their anti-oxidants reduce oxidative stress?
#23
Posted 06 March 2006 - 04:51 AM
#24
Posted 06 March 2006 - 06:49 AM
LEF also endorses GH3.
#25
Posted 06 March 2006 - 07:24 AM
Glisodin didn't make the list.
http://www.esculape....nsiondrugs.html
#26
Posted 06 March 2006 - 03:32 PM
#27
Posted 06 March 2006 - 03:49 PM
What I said was:
1) There are no anti-oxidants in that list, because a stack of different ones is needed to achieve good results. Look at the "protandim" thread.
2) There is not enough literature for LEF to recommend it in the top list.
3) Considering that I already take a good stack of anti-oxidant, adding Glisosin seems a good idea. I'm not the only one here that takes it
#28
Posted 06 March 2006 - 03:56 PM
That list is ten years old, I'm sure that would look alot different now. It seems like they have quit discussing anti-aging drugs in recent years.
Yea, 10 years is kind of old. The main thing that suprised me about that list was that GH3 was even on it.
#29
Posted 06 March 2006 - 04:31 PM
I've seen studies where people taking vitamin C and E had elevated C and E in their blood, but no reduction in oxidative stress.
This might or might not be the case with oral plant SOD. Why doesn't Glisodin do a study where they just do a before and after test of oxidative stress to answer this question?
#30
Posted 07 March 2006 - 01:08 PM
This might or might not be the case with oral plant SOD. Why doesn't Glisodin do a study where they just do a before and after test of oxidative stress to answer this question?
Money I guess. Doing clinical studies is VERY expensive and supplement companies rarely can afford them. I dont know who made Glisodin, but I dont think its a pharma.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users














