I'm presently taking 0.5g ALCAR + 0.5g ALCAR Arginate + 0.5g Carnosine + 0.5g K-RALA twice daily.
That looks like a great stack [thumb]
No B-Complex, choline, Omega 3's or 'racetams?
Posted 27 January 2005 - 02:03 AM
I'm presently taking 0.5g ALCAR + 0.5g ALCAR Arginate + 0.5g Carnosine + 0.5g K-RALA twice daily.
Posted 27 January 2005 - 03:01 AM
Oooh, ooh, I grew a neurite!!
[thumb]
LOL... I don't expect to feel anything except slightly stimulated (which I already do from regular ALCAR).
However, If I notice anything I'll let you know.
I'm presently taking 0.5g ALCAR + 0.5g ALCAR Arginate + 0.5g Carnosine + 0.5g K-RALA twice daily.
Posted 27 January 2005 - 04:34 AM
Posted 27 January 2005 - 04:37 AM
Posted 27 January 2005 - 04:43 AM
Cosmos,
Hell no. I take Life Extension Mix, Super Booster (both of which are not a bad deal if you purchace them in the Super sale still going on 'till the 31st) and a whole range of noots (p'tam, ani, pyritinol, alpha-GPC, Huper, vinpo, bacopa, hydergine, deprynyl...) along with PS, idebenone (research overwelmingly states this is positive regardless of what the people at Advanced Orthomolecular Research say (who I might add don't even think p'tam is a good idea!!! Credibility = 0). I also take benfotiamine, pyridoxamine, creatine, whey protein and the aforementioned alcar/carnosine/lipoic acid stack.
Posted 27 January 2005 - 08:56 AM
Posted 27 January 2005 - 05:24 PM
...don't even think p'tam is a good idea!!! Credibility = 0.
Posted 27 January 2005 - 05:46 PM
Posted 27 January 2005 - 06:27 PM
I take ... idebenone (research overwelmingly states this is positive regardless of what the people at Advanced Orthomolecular Research say
(who I might add don't even think p'tam is a good idea!!! Credibility = 0).
http://www.imminst.o...t=0It also contains pyroglutamic acid, which you may prefer to its xenobiotic analogs as a true orthomolecule (if that factors into your risk:benefit analysis).
http://www.imminst.o...t=0My personal bias is for orthomolecules over xenobiotics, so I would favor pyroglutamate over the drug analogs. However, beyond that, which nootropics to use -- individually or in combination -- would really be a matter of experimentation and personal priorities and habits. For instance, if you use nootropics only rarely for an immediate 'hit,' it seems anecdotally that aniracetam might be best, but clearly YMMV; piracetam or pyroglutamate would be better for chronic use because the latter is an orthomolecule and the former is the one with the most extensive human and experimental use.
http://www.imminst.o...733Since safety is your (sensible) concern: for long-term use, consider pyroglutamic acid instead, which is orthomolecular. Of course, this whole class of compounds certainly seems to be very safe; this is just extra caution.
They only consider orthomolecular molecules.Why is ORTHOMOLECULAR in red large type? Just curious...
Posted 27 January 2005 - 09:22 PM
However, we certainly favor orthomolecules over xenobiotics (including xenobiotic boranicals) when
Posted 28 January 2005 - 04:34 PM
orthomolecules = molecules relating to a theory that disease and especially mental illness may be cured by restoring the optimum amounts of such molecules normally present in the body, such as vitamins and minerals.
xenobiotics = A chemical which is not a natural component of the living organism exposed to it.
xenobiotic boranicals = xenobiotic botanicals mispelled (herbs etc) (??)
Posted 28 January 2005 - 10:07 PM
orthomolecules = molecules relating to a theory that disease and especially mental illness may be cured by restoring the optimum amounts of such molecules normally present in the body, such as vitamins and minerals.
xenobiotics = A chemical which is not a natural component of the living organism exposed to it.
xenobiotic boranicals = xenobiotic botanicals mispelled (herbs etc) (??)
Oops. Yes: "botanicals."
I tried editing the post, but I'm getting uneditable gobbledygook instead. I guess the typo stands.[ang]
AOR
Posted 28 January 2005 - 10:10 PM
Posted 28 January 2005 - 10:24 PM
Posted 28 January 2005 - 11:25 PM
Posted 11 April 2005 - 01:28 AM
Posted 29 April 2005 - 09:15 PM
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users