• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In    
  • Create Account
  LongeCity
              Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans

Photo
* * * * * 1 votes

Longecity has 'Unsatisfactory' WOT rating


  • Please log in to reply
12 replies to this topic

#1 Nootropic Cat

  • Guest
  • 148 posts
  • 36
  • Location:meow

Posted 17 August 2012 - 07:25 AM


For those who don't know, the Web of Trust add-on is a safe browsing tool that provides user-generated ratings of websites.

I've only just noticed that this site has an orange 'unsatisfactory' rating... I'm sure I would have noticed that before so most likely prior to this insufficient votes had been cast since the name change to generate a visible rating.

I'd encourage everyone to go here and up-rate the site back into the green.

Edited by TripleHelix, 17 August 2012 - 07:27 AM.

  • like x 3

#2 Logic

  • Guest
  • 2,659 posts
  • 587
  • Location:Kimberley, South Africa
  • NO

Posted 17 August 2012 - 11:06 AM

Done

You have to sign up. (top right)

Edited by Logic, 17 August 2012 - 11:07 AM.

  • like x 1

#3 Mind

  • Life Member, Director, Moderator, Treasurer
  • 19,042 posts
  • 2,000
  • Location:Wausau, WI

Posted 17 August 2012 - 06:20 PM

Done.
  • like x 1

#4 The Immortalist

  • Guest
  • 1,462 posts
  • 323
  • Location:.

Posted 17 August 2012 - 08:05 PM

Done

#5 MrHappy

  • Guest, Moderator
  • 1,815 posts
  • 404
  • Location:Australia

Posted 18 August 2012 - 12:48 AM

Done.
  • like x 1

#6 Nootropic Cat

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 148 posts
  • 36
  • Location:meow

Posted 18 August 2012 - 10:35 AM

That looks to have fixed it. Good job leaving some comments as well guys :~

#7 MrHappy

  • Guest, Moderator
  • 1,815 posts
  • 404
  • Location:Australia

Posted 18 August 2012 - 10:43 AM

I think a few more could be helpful - it's at 'good'. It should be 'excellent'! :)
  • like x 1

#8 AgeVivo

  • Guest, Engineer
  • 2,113 posts
  • 1,555

Posted 18 August 2012 - 10:56 AM

Done
  • like x 1

#9 Nootropic Cat

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 148 posts
  • 36
  • Location:meow

Posted 18 August 2012 - 02:53 PM

I think a few more could be helpful - it's at 'good'. It should be 'excellent'! :)


True... Bump.

#10 The Immortalist

  • Guest
  • 1,462 posts
  • 323
  • Location:.

Posted 19 August 2012 - 12:16 AM

I think a few more could be helpful - it's at 'good'. It should be 'excellent'! :)



#11 The Immortalist

  • Guest
  • 1,462 posts
  • 323
  • Location:.

Posted 20 August 2012 - 02:40 AM

bump

#12 lifebuddy

  • Guest
  • 156 posts
  • 19
  • Location:California

Posted 28 November 2012 - 02:43 AM

Done. Didn't even realize that site existed before now. Does it even make a difference what the rating is? Is it a popular reference for the trustworthiness of sites?

#13 Nootropic Cat

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 148 posts
  • 36
  • Location:meow

Posted 28 November 2012 - 06:38 AM

I think it's very widely used, generally as a browser add-on. Very useful for safe browsing, for example you can see ratings on your google search results, before even visiting the actual site.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users