• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In    
  • Create Account
  LongeCity
              Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans

Photo
- - - - -

Statin Use Correlates With Higher Telomerase Activity


  • Please log in to reply
12 replies to this topic

#1 reason

  • Guardian Reason
  • 1,101 posts
  • 250
  • Location:US

Posted 30 August 2013 - 11:34 AM


There has been interest in extending increasing telomerase expression as a means to slow aging for some years. The available tools other than gene therapy are sparse on the ground, however. Telomerase extends telomere length, the caps of repeating DNA sequences at the ends of chromosomes that shorten with each cell division. Telomerase may have other roles that more directly impact aging, however, such as an influence on mitochondrial function.
Shorter telomeres in at least some tissues correlate with stress and ill health and aging, but this is a very dynamic system - average telomere length can change in either direction on a short time scale. It is far from clear that progressively shorter telomere length is a cause of aging rather than just a reflection of other changes and damage, and the same goes for natural variations in levels of telomerase in the body. While increasing expression of telomerase is shown to extend life in mice, that may or may not have anything to do with telomere length, and mouse telomerase biology is quite different from that of humans.
So all this said, it was only a matter of time before researchers evaluated all the existing approved drugs for treatment of age-related conditions to see if any of them altered telomerase activity. There are regulatory incentives to beware of here, however, in that it is much cheaper for research institutions to try to find marginal new uses of already approved drugs than to work on new and radically better medical technologies that would then have to go through the exceedingly and unnecessarily expensive approval process. So don't expect anything of great practical use to result from this:

Not only do statins extend lives by lowering cholesterol levels and reducing the risks of cardiovascular disease, but new research [suggests] that they may extend lifespans as well. Specifically, statins may reduce the rate at which telomeres shorten, a key factor in the natural aging process. This opens the door for using statins, or derivatives of statins, as an anti-aging therapy. "By telomerase activation, statins may represent a new molecular switch able to slow down senescent cells in our tissues and be able to lead healthy lifespan extension."
To make this discovery, Paolisso and colleagues worked with two groups of subjects. The first group was under chronic statin therapy, and the second group (control), did not use statins. When researchers measured telomerase activity in both groups, those undergoing statin treatment had higher telomerase activity in their white blood cells, which was associated with lower telomeres shortening along with aging as compared to the control group. This strongly highlights the role of telomerase activation in preventing the excessive accumulation of short telomeres.
"The great thing about statins is that they reduce risks for cardiovascular disease significantly and are generally safe for most people. The bad thing is that statins do have side effects, like muscle injury. But if it is confirmed that statins might actually slow aging itself - and not just the symptoms of aging - then statins are much more powerful drugs than we ever thought."

Link: http://www.eurekaler...s-sms082913.php

View the full article at FightAging

#2 Turnbuckle

  • Location:USA
  • NO

Posted 30 August 2013 - 02:31 PM

The deadly lure of statins! They slow the erosion of your telomeres while destroying your mitochondria.
  • Dangerous, Irresponsible x 1

#3 hav

  • Guest
  • 1,089 posts
  • 219
  • Location:Cape Cod, MA
  • NO

Posted 10 September 2013 - 08:01 PM

The deadly lure of statins! They slow the erosion of your telomeres while destroying your mitochondria.


According to the abstract, statin use seems to slow telomere errosion in the elderly compared to those who do not use statins:

A new pleiotropic effect of statins in elderly: modulation of telomerase activity.

Recent evidence suggests a link between statins and telomere biology. Whether statin treatment may modulate telomerase activity and affect telomere erosion rate is unknown. We aimed at investigating the potential impact of statin therapy on peripheral blood mononuclear cells telomerase activity, its implication on LTL variability, and its association with telomere shortening rates along with aging. The cross-sectional study was conducted in 230 subjects (age range: 30-86 y) stratified according to statins treatment. LTL was measured by quantitative polymerase chain reaction and telomerase activity by a PCR-ELISA protocol. Subjects on statin treatment showed higher telomerase activity (P<0.0001) and longer LTL (P=0.028) levels compared to the nonstatin group. Statin therapy was associated with higher telomerase activity independently of multiple covariates, including age, gender, smoking habits, lipid, systemic inflammation, glucose, and blood pressure levels (P=0.019). Indeed, subjects on statin treatment showed significant lower telomere erosion along with aging. Every 1 y increment in age, LTL decreases by 0.058 Kb in no statin and 0.033 Kb in statin groups, respectively, as well as the major difference in telomere attrition between groups was found after the age of 65 yr (P<0.0001). In summary, statins, modulating telomerase activity, affect telomere erosion along with aging


Of course, if the statin usage is also accompanied by myopathy and cognitive loss, that longevity effect might not be a such a good thing.

Howard

sponsored ad

  • Advert

#4 maxwatt

  • Guest, Moderator LeadNavigator
  • 4,949 posts
  • 1,625
  • Location:New York

Posted 10 September 2013 - 08:53 PM

I recall seeing a paper to the effect that most statin users who developed myopathies, after a washout period, if they restarted the drug, did not suffer the effects and statins were well tolerated. Whether it was the dose, lack of a ramp-up period, another confounding factor or what, if anything, I have no idea. And the paper did not speak to the few who could not tolerate them under any circumstances. Which is another question deserving research.

If you want to try statins, without using a prescription drug, pleurote mushrooms, a readily available and inexpensive delicacy, contain significant amounts of lovastatin and have been used medicinally in many cultures to treat the same conditions western medicine uses the drug for.
  • like x 2

#5 trying2survive

  • Guest
  • 51 posts
  • 40
  • Location:CA

Posted 12 September 2013 - 06:55 PM

came across this cogent article about how statins work and why avoid them.
http://people.csail....eally_work.html
  • like x 1
  • dislike x 1

#6 Turnbuckle

  • Location:USA
  • NO

Posted 12 September 2013 - 09:18 PM

came across this cogent article about how statins work and why avoid them.
http://people.csail....eally_work.html



Excellent article. I especially liked this concluding remark--

Every individual gets at most only one chance to grow old. When you experience your body falling apart, it is easy to imagine that this is just due to the fact that you are advancing in age. I think the best way to characterize statin therapy is that it makes you grow older faster. Mobility is a great miracle that cholesterol has enabled in all animals. By suppressing cholesterol synthesis, statin drugs can destroy that mobility. No study has shown that statins improve all-cause mortality statistics. But there can be no doubt that statins will make your remaining days on earth a lot less pleasant than they would otherwise be.


So in sum, if "it makes you grow older faster," then it is completely at odds with the purpose of this website.
  • Dangerous, Irresponsible x 1

#7 hav

  • Guest
  • 1,089 posts
  • 219
  • Location:Cape Cod, MA
  • NO

Posted 14 September 2013 - 06:09 PM

came across this cogent article about how statins work and why avoid them.
http://people.csail....eally_work.html


Her statistical analysis technique is fascinating. Doing a computerized heuristic analysis of 8400 online product reviews.

Howard

Edited by hav, 14 September 2013 - 06:28 PM.

  • Cheerful x 1

#8 rwac

  • Member
  • 4,764 posts
  • 61
  • Location:Dimension X

Posted 14 September 2013 - 07:22 PM

came across this cogent article about how statins work and why avoid them.
http://people.csail....eally_work.html


Her statistical analysis technique is fascinating. Doing a computerized heuristic analysis of 8400 online product reviews.

Howard


She's coming at it from a different angle.
"Stephanie Seneff is a Senior Research Scientist at the MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory. She received the B.S. degree in Biophysics in 1968, the M.S. and E.E. degrees in Electrical Engineering in 1980, and the Ph.D degree in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science in 1985, all from MIT."

http://people.csail.mit.edu/seneff/

Edited by rwac, 14 September 2013 - 07:23 PM.


#9 hav

  • Guest
  • 1,089 posts
  • 219
  • Location:Cape Cod, MA
  • NO

Posted 14 September 2013 - 09:08 PM

She's coming at it from a different angle.
"Stephanie Seneff is a Senior Research Scientist at the MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory. She received the B.S. degree in Biophysics in 1968, the M.S. and E.E. degrees in Electrical Engineering in 1980, and the Ph.D degree in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science in 1985, all from MIT."

http://people.csail.mit.edu/seneff/


It occurs to me that her software approach could easily be adapted into lets say a feature of this site, with comments analyzed to quantify the opinions of posters here. Just not sure how accurate that could be. Guess one could make a controlled assessment of the accuracy by comparing the results to actual polls of those who comment. Or in the case of this study, with star ratings of customer reviews on Amazon UK if they sell non-prescription statins there.

Howard

#10 McQueen

  • Guest
  • 37 posts
  • 3
  • Location:Dallas

Posted 03 November 2013 - 03:53 AM

Thank you for the article on statins. I tossed mine that I took intermittently.

#11 Adaptogen

  • Guest
  • 772 posts
  • 239
  • Location:United States

Posted 03 November 2013 - 04:37 AM

So, what are the alternatives for those with predispositions for having high cholesterol? My dad was off his statins for around two or three months, and on his most recent non-comprehensive test his total cholesterol was 377 on the first test, 337 the next day (the test did not tell ratios).

He doesn't exercise or diet religiously, but at home we generally have a pretty good diet of fish a few times a week, nightly salads, and minimal carbohydrates/refined carbs. I have him taking ubiquinol and soon to start c60. Is there anything else I could add to mitigate damage?

#12 Adaptogen

  • Guest
  • 772 posts
  • 239
  • Location:United States

Posted 03 November 2013 - 05:51 AM

and is it true that the benefits of statins are related to NF-Kappa B inhibition and nitric oxide production, rather than the cholesterol lowering effect?

#13 Turnbuckle

  • Location:USA
  • NO

Posted 03 November 2013 - 01:33 PM

Thank you for the article on statins. I tossed mine that I took intermittently.


You should've kept it to poison vermin.
  • dislike x 1




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users