Over the last couple of years, the literature has convinced me to prefer a high gamma form of Vit E, which I usually consume 400 IU/day with a meal containing fat. (I rotate between the following: Carlson's E-gems Elite, Vitamin Shoppe's High Gamma E, and Now's Gamma E complex).
This new research is a bit disturbing, but I'd like to take a closer look, and am hoping some of you could offer some theory as well:
3/7/2006 - Gamma-tocopherol, the major form of vitamin E consumed in the American diet, and becoming more popular in dietary supplements, produces metabolites that are toxic to cells, claims a new study.
http://www.nutraingr...yemtroznslkhwdf
This study looked at a metabolite of gamma tocopherols (gamma-Toc quinone), and the cytotoxicity thereof. It seems as though gamma-toc itself is not toxic, nor is alpha-toc or alpha-toc quinone (alpha tocopherol's metabolite).
The study used mice brain and skin cells, and monkey kidney cells. This may not be applicable to humans, as mice/human skin concentrations of gamma-toc vary by huge amounts.
The other issue to look at is tocopherols vs. tocotrienols, as this study focused on the former. Some good research has documented the benefits of the latter, such as:
Tocotrienols:
http://www.nutraingr...atherosclerosis
This particular study doesn't distinguish between the 4 totrienols however.
It seems as though quite a few variables exist, including the relevance of a metabolite being toxic vs. the actual compound being toxic...when the metabolite is water soluable and will be excreted anyway. Is any damage done before elimination? I have to instinctively raise an eyebrow at vit E research after that comical meta-analysis in '04...
Hoping some of you Vit. E experts can chime in with some discussion.














