Can someone explain the "Twilight"...
advancedatheist 21 Nov 2009
She also had plans to see the "New Moon" film last night, so I'll probably have to listen to her talk about the movie for the next two days as well.
I don't understand the appeal of a 100 year old teen-looking vampire who still goes to high school.
Shepard 21 Nov 2009
It's way too accurate.
It's a literary abortion. The movie was even worse. Even if you're crazy about the book, it was just a poorly made movie.
Anyway, it's amazing the number of Twilight backgrounds that you see on college girls' laptops. I've heard of several ruined relationships because the male wasn't as good as Edward. It further erodes my faith in humanity.
Edited by Shepard, 21 November 2009 - 03:25 PM.
advancedatheist 21 Nov 2009
RighteousReason 21 Nov 2009
I read the first couple of books. The books aren't bad, understanding that the target demographic is teenage girls. I will probably see the movies someday.My week end desk help, a 20 year old woman named Liz, read all four of the novels (even though she says she doesn't normally read books!), and then she had to tell me all about them. More than I cared to know, in other words.
She also had plans to see the "New Moon" film last night, so I'll probably have to listen to her talk about the movie for the next two days as well.
I don't understand the appeal of a 100 year old teen-looking vampire who still goes to high school.
Edited by RighteousReason, 21 November 2009 - 04:04 PM.
Luna 30 Nov 2009
It's just good. you can relate to it (Twilight)
niner 30 Nov 2009
FunkOdyssey 30 Nov 2009
Vampires are about sex and danger and beautiful people. What's so hard to see about the attraction of that?
And don't forget, vampires are about immortality! Its an easy way to start conversations on the topic. This twilight movie might feature one of the only widely-appealing, moralistic, immortal protagonists on film anywhere.
Skötkonung 30 Nov 2009
I think it is decent entertainment if you know what to expect -- it isn't a brilliant sequel to some Anne Rice novel, it doesn't involve some deep plot, or provide a new perspective to the vampire archetype. The Twilight movies are just teen romance movies based around a vampire plot. When I saw Twilight, I enjoyed it as passive entertainment and even had to laugh in a few places. It is what it is.It's way too accurate.
It's a literary abortion. The movie was even worse. Even if you're crazy about the book, it was just a poorly made movie.
Anyway, it's amazing the number of Twilight backgrounds that you see on college girls' laptops. I've heard of several ruined relationships because the male wasn't as good as Edward. It further erodes my faith in humanity.
Now if you want a really interesting vampire film, I suggest a Swedish film called "Låt den rätte komma in" or translation "Let the Right One In" I think.
It is about a centuries old vampire child that seduces a young Swedish boy. It is pretty twisted. Makes me want to move back to my home country with our real winters
Anyways, I've been told I could pass for a vampire because I am so white / light complexion. I just tell them I have some of the same goals...to stop my skin from aging by hiding from the sun hah.
Esoparagon 01 Dec 2009
Singularity 01 Dec 2009
TheFountain 01 Dec 2009
In a way, the Twilight fad shows that we still don't know how to use our relative abundance constructively. These girls and young women have the discretionary income to buy the novels, the paraphernalia, the DVD's and the movie tickets so that they can indulge in a fantasy borrowed from a Mormon housewife, and not a very good fantasy at that. I have trouble imagining women doing that in, say, Afghanistan (though in the Afghan towns with electricity they might catch a Bollywood film once in a while).
Or maybe it just shows how tired women are of most men that they are seeking some abstract ideal embodied in the character of edward.
TheFountain 01 Dec 2009
I think it is decent entertainment if you know what to expect -- it isn't a brilliant sequel to some Anne Rice novel, it doesn't involve some deep plot, or provide a new perspective to the vampire archetype. The Twilight movies are just teen romance movies based around a vampire plot. When I saw Twilight, I enjoyed it as passive entertainment and even had to laugh in a few places. It is what it is.It's way too accurate.
It's a literary abortion. The movie was even worse. Even if you're crazy about the book, it was just a poorly made movie.
Anyway, it's amazing the number of Twilight backgrounds that you see on college girls' laptops. I've heard of several ruined relationships because the male wasn't as good as Edward. It further erodes my faith in humanity.
Now if you want a really interesting vampire film, I suggest a Swedish film called "Låt den rätte komma in" or translation "Let the Right One In" I think.
It is about a centuries old vampire child that seduces a young Swedish boy. It is pretty twisted. Makes me want to move back to my home country with our real winters
Anyways, I've been told I could pass for a vampire because I am so white / light complexion. I just tell them I have some of the same goals...to stop my skin from aging by hiding from the sun hah.
One week I watched nothing but vampire films, both new and old. The best ones were Nosferatu from the 70s, bram stokers dracula and the hunger starring david bowie which actually I found the most interesting as it deals with a disease of accelerated aging that sets in if the vampires do not feed. A definitely different perspective on vampires. I have not yet been able to sit through twilight yet. I tried in one sitting but found the acting horrendous.
Skötkonung 01 Dec 2009
I really liked Hunger as well, it is a good film! Havn't seen the 70s version of Nosferatu, but I thought William Dafoe did an excellent job when he reprized the role in Shadow of a Vampire.One week I watched nothing but vampire films, both new and old. The best ones were Nosferatu from the 70s, bram stokers dracula and the hunger starring david bowie which actually I found the most interesting as it deals with a disease of accelerated aging that sets in if the vampires do not feed. A definitely different perspective on vampires. I have not yet been able to sit through twilight yet. I tried in one sitting but found the acting horrendous.
One of my guilt pleasures is Queen of the Damned. Like Twilight, it is aimed at the high school age audience and is loosely based around an Anne Rice novel. I like that Jonathan Davis did the vocals for Lestat's rock band.
Shannon Vyff 02 Dec 2009
VictorBjoerk 02 Dec 2009
TheFountain 02 Dec 2009
I really liked Hunger as well, it is a good film! Havn't seen the 70s version of Nosferatu, but I thought William Dafoe did an excellent job when he reprized the role in Shadow of a Vampire.One week I watched nothing but vampire films, both new and old. The best ones were Nosferatu from the 70s, bram stokers dracula and the hunger starring david bowie which actually I found the most interesting as it deals with a disease of accelerated aging that sets in if the vampires do not feed. A definitely different perspective on vampires. I have not yet been able to sit through twilight yet. I tried in one sitting but found the acting horrendous.
One of my guilt pleasures is Queen of the Damned. Like Twilight, it is aimed at the high school age audience and is loosely based around an Anne Rice novel. I like that Jonathan Davis did the vocals for Lestat's rock band.
You should see werner herzogs version of nosferatu. A brilliant work of art. I am very unforgiving of films that have little to no artistic merit. Twilight to me just seems very mass produced and without a soul, or perhaps with the semblance of a fake soul but I am too educated in art and philosophy not to see through it.
forever freedom 03 Dec 2009
Regarding Twilight I just saw an interview in a swedish magazine with a woman who lived like a vampire, slept in a coffin,dressed in black,hated sun,she also had a fetish for drinking blood( she used a knife and had some willing lovers sharing their blood with her). I wonder what kind of sub-cultures Twilight creates.....
These vampire subcultures already existed far before Twilight.
The Vampire Don
Edited by forever freedom, 03 December 2009 - 12:54 PM.
Shannon Vyff 03 Dec 2009
Skötkonung 03 Dec 2009
That's disgusting, I HATE needles! I wonder if he bleaches his skin? Or if he wears makeup?Regarding Twilight I just saw an interview in a swedish magazine with a woman who lived like a vampire, slept in a coffin,dressed in black,hated sun,she also had a fetish for drinking blood( she used a knife and had some willing lovers sharing their blood with her). I wonder what kind of sub-cultures Twilight creates.....
These vampire subcultures already existed far before Twilight.
The Vampire Don
snow leopard 24 Dec 2009
niner 24 Dec 2009
You know what I think? I think this guy is a fraud. He's just tripping with his pointy incisors and his long fingernails and pale (made up?) skin. He's got this schtick going on and he's so convincing that he's sucked in the girlfriend/blood donor, and all the sensationalist TV programs. So he drinks a little blood. Big deal. People have been drinking animal blood forever. I bet he doesn't do appearances on shows for free.These vampire subcultures already existed far before Twilight.
The Vampire Don
sentrysnipe 24 Dec 2009
I blame the school teachers. My sister got obsessed with this phenomenon through their language arts teacher around 2 years ago.
Great job of feeding into the sexually frustrated and hormonally driven girls of middle school. Nice business model actually. Anne Rice is probably pissed off.
advancedatheist 24 Dec 2009
The vampire meme is good for immortality.
I wonder why our culture has rebranded vampires, but not Victor Frankenstein. He wanted to discover a scientific means to conquer death, so his myth seems more relevant to our interests than the woo basis of vampires' negligible senescence.
Even Saul Kent acknowledges that:
forever freedom 24 Dec 2009
You know what I think? I think this guy is a fraud. He's just tripping with his pointy incisors and his long fingernails and pale (made up?) skin. He's got this schtick going on and he's so convincing that he's sucked in the girlfriend/blood donor, and all the sensationalist TV programs. So he drinks a little blood. Big deal. People have been drinking animal blood forever. I bet he doesn't do appearances on shows for free.These vampire subcultures already existed far before Twilight.
The Vampire Don
What do you mean by "fraud". Obviously, he's not a real vampire, in the way they appear on movies. Not even he claims that. He could have been born with a set of characteristics that are akin to those that stereotypical vampires have (like being thin, pale, and maybe not being disgusted by the idea of drinking blood), and he realized this and played into the role, adding a few more characteristics to become closer to a real vamp, like sleeping in a coffin, only being active at night and using fake incisors (he admitted it in a TV show, without thinking twice).
He is a showman, he doesn't do much mystery about it, but there's enough suggestive content in his image to make it very alluring and magical to mindless preteen girls like the Twilight fans. Apart from the extremes of the vampire subculture (where we'll find nutbags of all sorts), people playing the role like Don are aware of and don't try to hide the fact that they're not real, stereotypical vampires, but just people with maybe a few inborn or adopted (often, inborn and adopted) characteristics that make them be/look closer to these hollywood vampires than most other people.
N.T.M. 07 Mar 2010
*waits for verbal abuse* =/
Forever21 07 Mar 2010
The appeal of Vampirism to me is more like psychodynamics. Vampirism is just humanity's way of expressing our innermost desire. Immortality. The life after death. The defeat of aging itself. We feel so powerless over death and vampire folkore is our escape. It appeals to us because we desire eternal life. Not as an alien being in another world or a heavenly angel above but something more earthly and human. Somebody that can return and reunite with family or loved ones. Someone who can indulge in earthly pleasures, someone who can have friends and enemies. Someone who can give life, take life, do good, take revenge, be happy, get angry, and express other human emotions at a greater intensity. Someone who's attractive, powerful, intelligent, rich, cultured, and carries a number of amazing skills & talents. Through vampirism we express our desire for greater happiness. The sucking of blood is a symbol of our deep yearning for greater pleasure. Whether as an infant getting necessary nutrition from the mother, thumbsucking, a child displaying curiosity of things he could get his hands on, a prehistoric man sucking on a bone marrow meal, adam and eve's yearning for the fruit from the tree of life (hence immortality), the simple joy of sucking on a lollipop, the figurative sucking up to the boss for greater pay, engaging in sexual intimacy with another person. Everything about humanity's greatest desires are intensified in the Vampire world.
And this is why the folkore will live on. Twilight, True Blood, Vampire Diaries are just modern interpretations that relates to the culture of this new generation. But the message and appeal remains the same. Our deep seated desire for Immortality & Pleasure.
Edited by Forever21, 07 March 2010 - 02:56 PM.
advancedatheist 07 Mar 2010
Yet our culture has rebranded vampires as positive mythological figures, even though the vampire myth (VM) and FM both show the transgression of the boundary between life and death. I don't understand why vampires have gotten the public relations makeover, but not Victor Frankenstein and the scientists compared to him.
So, I wonder: If we could reframe cryonics to associate it more closely with VM than with FM, would that change how our culture thinks about cryonics and its goals?
TheFountain 08 Mar 2010
I think, fundamentally, it has to do with frankenstein more resembling the work of science than the work of religion. Vampires are almost like archangels (or fallen heroes) in a sense. So they are more likened to religious figures than frankenstein, who is, in the mind of the masses, the creation of a kooky scientist.I don't understand why vampires have gotten the public relations makeover, but not Victor Frankenstein and the scientists compared to him.
LY999 14 Apr 2010
I think, fundamentally, it has to do with frankenstein more resembling the work of science than the work of religion. Vampires are almost like archangels (or fallen heroes) in a sense. So they are more likened to religious figures than frankenstein, who is, in the mind of the masses, the creation of a kooky scientist.I don't understand why vampires have gotten the public relations makeover, but not Victor Frankenstein and the scientists compared to him.
Well, there is one organization that claims to help people turn into "vampires".
It's called the Temple of the Vampire.
Why don't you ask David Styles about it?
He's a high ranking member there!