AgingSoft the software in biogerontology
jonano 20 Jun 2005
research for aging. Feel free to visit my page here:
http://www.nanoaging...showpage&pid=47
--Jon
Infernity 20 Jun 2005
It's like *aging* and that's it. There are plenty of things I believe we don't think of that comes with aging.
Tiniest example- the grinding of the gristle, which the body does not provide a replacement; the lost of these tiny hairs in the ears that makes us lose our ability of hearing, in the end- they shall all fall and bring us to deafness... And there are plenty more small things we don't think of when we think of aging.
I saw a while ago a program about aging, and they have demonstrated one of the biggest problems, very nicely put.
Take a picture of yourself and photocopy in a black and white photocopying machine. Now take the the result and make an experiment.
Simply copy it. and then copy the copy. and then, copy the copy... etcetera, etcetera...
You'll see that the most recent copy is less evident.
In the end you'll see nothing.
This is exactly what happened to us.
The cells simply get harmed with time in to inability to copy, or copy a defective one, as every once in a time there are few lagging... Till nothing lefts. Well, yet we die before all are defected. It is not an easy case, to stop mishap from happening, after all, these are simply incidents, they happen. Unfortunately people are so firmly fixed on it being natural. How sad. They do not even bother listening, and those who do prefer ignoring or not comprehending because they don't want to be wrong, or go *against the grain*.
You should decide which part of the aging thing you wish to focus on. There are lots of aging theories.
Yours
~Infernity
ilia 20 Jun 2005
Mech Ageing Dev. 2005 Jan;126(1):99-103.
Modelling the disposable soma theory of ageing.
Drenos F, Kirkwood TB.
School of Clinical Medical Sciences-Gerontology, Henry Wellcome Laboratory for Biogerontology Research, Institute for Ageing and Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne NE4 6BE, UK.
We describe a mathematical model, developed using the Mathematica programming system of the disposable soma theory of ageing. The model makes explicit predictions about the optimal strategies for investment in somatic maintenance versus investments in growth and reproduction and confirms the central prediction of the disposable soma theory that the optimum investment in somatic maintenance is less than what would be required for indefinite longevity. We also describe how the optimal investment in maintenance is affected by varying the parameters that specify the schedules of reproduction and mortality.
PMID: 15610767 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
jonano 21 Jun 2005
Have you considered resource allocation models? Here is a recent article by Kirkwood in this area:
Mech Ageing Dev. 2005 Jan;126(1):99-103.
Modelling the disposable soma theory of ageing.
Drenos F, Kirkwood TB.
School of Clinical Medical Sciences-Gerontology, Henry Wellcome Laboratory for Biogerontology Research, Institute for Ageing and Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne NE4 6BE, UK.
PMID: 15610767 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Where did you get this text ? I want the url please
--Jon
jonano 21 Jun 2005
--Jon
jonano 21 Jun 2005
We will ask them if they need some software and that we can provide them some programmers for free.
Are you interested to do this job for me please ?
--Jon
ilia 21 Jun 2005
This entire issue of Mechanisms of Ageing and Development is freely available on www.sciencedirect.com, so I am attaching the whole thing.
Attached Files
Infernity 21 Jun 2005
Here's a place where members suppose to fill in their Media, but no one but three did.
http://www.imminst.o...&f=63&t=6591&s=
See if they can fill it...
Yours
~Infernity
John Schloendorn 22 Jun 2005
bgwowk 22 Jun 2005
Actually, Infernity, that's not a good model of aging. Life is digital (genetic code), not analog. Like digital music, life is intrinsically capable of replicating its essential aspects perfectly across millions and millions of cell divisions. Our germ cells do exactly that. As Mike West likes to point out, the cells of your body are part of a living legacy of protoplasm that has been continuously dividing and faithfully preserving the machinery of life FOR THREE BILLION YEARS.Take a picture of yourself and photocopy in a black and white photocopying machine. Now take the the result and make an experiment.
Simply copy it. and then copy the copy. and then, copy the copy... etcetera, etcetera...
You'll see that the most recent copy is less evident.
In the end you'll see nothing.
This is exactly what happened to us.
The cells simply get harmed with time in to inability to copy, or copy a defective one, as every once in a time there are few lagging...
We age as individuals for the same reason our skin cells slough off and die: Individuals, like skin cells, have evolved as expendable elements in a grand scheme that keeps living machinery going for eons. In other words, aging of individual organisms evolved as a consequence of individual expendability in the perpetuation of genes, not because life is intrinsically incapable of making good cell copies. There is no basic reason our somatic cells, with a few tweaks, could not perform with the same stability and essentially unlimited replicative capacity of our germ line.
The belief that life by nature must always "wear out" is perhaps the most common misconception about biological immortality. Life's innate capacity for renewal and pepetuation of correct cell operation is worth remembering.
---BrianW
jonano 22 Jun 2005
http://www.ncbi.nlm....0767&query_hl=1
jonano 22 Jun 2005
John Schloendorn 23 Jun 2005
This could really save a lot of time to a lot of people I think.
rahein 23 Jun 2005
John Schloendorn 27 Jun 2005
JonesGuy 27 Jun 2005
Both astronomy and life-sciences could use 3-D navigable images. The number of times I've rotated an enzyme in my head is beyond count (and I guess as an exercise it's good for staving off brain decay), but woof! it's tough.