I have seen this posted elsewhere. What do you all make of it?
http://www.ncbi.nlm....pt=AbstractPlus
Edited by FuLL meMbeR, 29 January 2008 - 01:02 AM.
Posted 29 January 2008 - 12:25 AM
Edited by FuLL meMbeR, 29 January 2008 - 01:02 AM.
Posted 29 January 2008 - 12:56 AM
I have seen this posted elsewhere. What fo you all make of it?
http://www.ncbi.nlm....pt=AbstractPlus
Posted 29 January 2008 - 01:53 AM
Posted 29 January 2008 - 01:58 AM
Edited by niner, 29 January 2008 - 02:01 AM.
Posted 29 January 2008 - 02:41 AM
The title is misleading: the trials were all done by the same lab. I updated the wiki entry for resveratrol a while ago to mention these trials, but I haven't read a good rebuttal to the trial. What seems more critical: what independent studies confirm sinclair's findings?
Posted 29 January 2008 - 02:44 AM
When they say "seven independent trials" do they mean 7 different labs? From reading the abstract it sounds like the same guys tried 7 times. While this result in worms doesn't shock me, there's an awful lot of evidence that resveratrol is doing something good... I'm still waiting on lifespan results for mice on a normal diet, or any mammal on a normal diet. (crickets chirping)
edit: lucid, you beat me to it.
Posted 29 January 2008 - 03:08 AM
The title is misleading: the trials were all done by the same lab. I updated the wiki entry for resveratrol a while ago to mention these trials, but I haven't read a good rebuttal to the trial. What seems more critical: what independent studies confirm sinclair's findings?
Posted 29 January 2008 - 04:19 AM
What doses did they use? It's so vague.The title is misleading: the trials were all done by the same lab. I updated the wiki entry for resveratrol a while ago to mention these trials, but I haven't read a good rebuttal to the trial. What seems more critical: what independent studies confirm sinclair's findings?
We saw no significant effects on lifespan in seven independent trials. We analysed our resveratrol and found that its structure was normal, with no oxidative modifications. We therefore re-tested the effects of resveratrol in C. elegans, in both wild-type and sir-2.1 mutant worms. The results were variable, with resveratrol treatment resulting in slight increases in lifespan in some trials but not others, in both wild type and sir-2.1 mutant animals
Posted 29 January 2008 - 05:15 AM
Without the full paper it's impossible to evaluate, and maybe not even then. FWIW, there is a paper demonstrating that caloric restriction does not extend lifespan in a wild strain of mice. At the end of the paper they speculate they may have over-restricted the mice as the restricted group tended to die young, and even the control group may have been calorically restricted.What doses did they use? It's so vague.The title is misleading: the trials were all done by the same lab. I updated the wiki entry for resveratrol a while ago to mention these trials, but I haven't read a good rebuttal to the trial. What seems more critical: what independent studies confirm sinclair's findings?
We saw no significant effects on lifespan in seven independent trials. We analysed our resveratrol and found that its structure was normal, with no oxidative modifications. We therefore re-tested the effects of resveratrol in C. elegans, in both wild-type and sir-2.1 mutant worms. The results were variable, with resveratrol treatment resulting in slight increases in lifespan in some trials but not others, in both wild type and sir-2.1 mutant animals
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users