• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In    
  • Create Account
  LongeCity
              Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans

Photo
- - - - -

Blueberry vs. blackcurrant


  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 JLL

  • Guest
  • 2,192 posts
  • 161

Posted 28 July 2008 - 08:07 PM


So, clearly blueberry has a lot of positive effects, but what about blackcurrant? According to blackcurrantfoundation.co.uk (see for example http://www.blackcurr...fo.aspx?id=221), the antioxidant, anthocyanin and vitamin C content of blackcurrants is higher than that of blueberries. They also claim it's better for fighting aging in general.

I've been mixing 100 grams of frozen blackcurrants in my morning smoothie for a while now and have been wondering whether I should replace them with frozen blueberries or use both. Blackcurrants cost about a third of blueberries' price, but if blueberries are significantly better for health, the cost would still be manageable for me.

I assume that fresh is better than frozen but frozen is still quite good. Is this correct? Also, any opinions on which would be better, an extract or frozen berries?

#2 nootrope

  • Guest
  • 88 posts
  • 125

Posted 29 July 2008 - 02:51 AM

Blackcurrants also have some Gamma Linolenic Acid too don't they? I had some blackcurrants fresh a few weeks ago.

The levels of beneficial compounds in blueberries can vary quite a bit, depending on whether they are organic/conventional and cultivated/wild. Specific studies at Tufts University have shown brain benefits in animal models from blueberry extract. The chemical or chemicals responsible may or may not be anthocyanins. Maybe it's pterostilbene or something else. I think both blueberries and blackcurrants are great to eat regularly, and don't think it's easy to say which is better. But it's generally harder for me to find blackcurrants in the store so if I see them, I'd buy them over conventional cultivated blueberries.

So, clearly blueberry has a lot of positive effects, but what about blackcurrant? According to blackcurrantfoundation.co.uk (see for example http://www.blackcurr...fo.aspx?id=221), the antioxidant, anthocyanin and vitamin C content of blackcurrants is higher than that of blueberries. They also claim it's better for fighting aging in general.

I've been mixing 100 grams of frozen blackcurrants in my morning smoothie for a while now and have been wondering whether I should replace them with frozen blueberries or use both. Blackcurrants cost about a third of blueberries' price, but if blueberries are significantly better for health, the cost would still be manageable for me.

I assume that fresh is better than frozen but frozen is still quite good. Is this correct? Also, any opinions on which would be better, an extract or frozen berries?



sponsored ad

  • Advert
Click HERE to rent this advertising spot for NUTRITION to support LongeCity (this will replace the google ad above).

#3 Dmitri

  • Guest
  • 841 posts
  • 33
  • Location:Houston and Chicago

Posted 06 August 2008 - 10:21 PM

So, clearly blueberry has a lot of positive effects, but what about blackcurrant? According to blackcurrantfoundation.co.uk (see for example http://www.blackcurr...fo.aspx?id=221), the antioxidant, anthocyanin and vitamin C content of blackcurrants is higher than that of blueberries. They also claim it's better for fighting aging in general.

I've been mixing 100 grams of frozen blackcurrants in my morning smoothie for a while now and have been wondering whether I should replace them with frozen blueberries or use both. Blackcurrants cost about a third of blueberries' price, but if blueberries are significantly better for health, the cost would still be manageable for me.

I assume that fresh is better than frozen but frozen is still quite good. Is this correct? Also, any opinions on which would be better, an extract or frozen berries?


Blueberries are considered the #5 food when it comes to anti-oxidants, so they're likely better than blackcurrant.

http://www.webmd.com...nexpected-foods

top 20:

1 Small red beans (dried).

2 Wild blueberries.

3 Red Kidney beans.

4 Pinto beans.

5 Blueberries (cultivated).

6 Cranberries.

7 Artichokes (cooked).

8 Blackberries.

9 Prunes.

10 Raspberries.

11 Strawberries.

12 Red Delicious apples.

13 Granny Smith apples.

14 Pecans.

15 Sweet cherries.

16 Black plums.

17 Russet potatoes (cooked).

18 Black beans (dried).

19 Plums.

20 Gala apples.

Researchers also found that cooking method also had a significant effect on the antioxidant content of the foods tested, but those effects were not consistent.

For example, cooked Russet and red potatoes had much lower antioxidant levels than those found in raw potatoes. Boiling also decreased antioxidant levels in carrots, but cooking tomatoes increased their antioxidant content.



#4 JLL

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 2,192 posts
  • 161

Posted 07 August 2008 - 06:39 PM

Perhaps blackcurrants weren't included in the study? I think blackcurrants at least have more antioxidants than apples or plums.

#5 Dmitri

  • Guest
  • 841 posts
  • 33
  • Location:Houston and Chicago

Posted 07 August 2008 - 08:53 PM

Perhaps blackcurrants weren't included in the study? I think blackcurrants at least have more antioxidants than apples or plums.


Why do you think it has more than apples and plums?

#6 kismet

  • Guest
  • 2,984 posts
  • 424
  • Location:Austria, Vienna

Posted 09 August 2008 - 03:03 PM

Perhaps blackcurrants weren't included in the study? I think blackcurrants at least have more antioxidants than apples or plums.


Why do you think it has more than apples and plums?

Why do you seem to still believe in the antioxidant fad? There is much more to foods than their antioxidant values.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users