There's a provincial election going on in Canada where I live right now. In my town I read in the newspaper that there were 90000 people eligible to vote and only 42000 voted. Is this a common occurrence where any of you guy's live? Is voter apathy a good or bad thing?
Adverts help to support the work of this non-profit organisation. To go ad-free join as a Member.
3 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 15 October 2011 - 11:18 PM
There's a provincial election going on in Canada where I live right now. In my town I read in the newspaper that there were 90000 people eligible to vote and only 42000 voted. Is this a common occurrence where any of you guy's live? Is voter apathy a good or bad thing?
#2
Posted 17 October 2011 - 09:56 AM
It's certainly widespread in Poland. We regularly have parliamentary elections where the turnout sticks round 40 % or so (in municipal or provincial it will be even less), and often the most disciplined electorate are the elderly who ussually vote for hard-core right wing parties, which is very unfortunate because those kind of parties don't concern themselves that much with the "mundane" stuff of how to create wealth and keep economic disparities at bay, instead they focus mostly on ideological issues like fighting abortion and taking a stand against the idea of gay marriage, which all may be important matters for the people directly involved in such personal situations, but are not decisive at all in the grand scheme of things.
When you ask one of the absent voters as to why they don't vote, they will say something like "none of the parties really represent me", "it's all rigged anyway", "politicians here are all the same" blah blah blah. Some of that will ring true, but it's kind of like a brocken clock two times a day - they are simply lucky to get it right, it doesn't come from any substantial analysis of the factors at play. It's something wholly different from, say, an Anarchist who has decided to opt-out of the system for well thought-out ideological reasons.They don't even want to take the damn time to learn about what exactly different parties are proposing in terms of tax policies and such (apparently numbers are boring to them), so no wonder they later feel like none represent their interests, because they themselves express no discerneble views that could be represented. I am both angry and bewildered as almost every time there is an election, there will be one or two candidates without any record under their belts who get elected into the parliament, simply because his or her last name is the same as some other, non-related, already famous politician (I'm totally serious about this), it's like people go inside the voting booth and have no idea what they're doing.
So it's all a massive Catch - 22, I'd say. Ignorant electorate breeds lousy politicians, there's no way around that.
Even the ones that actually are active and want to change something are thin on the ground. This Saturday there were protests in Warsaw modeled after the 99% thing, and according to the police 150 people showed up, even though there are things that a lot more folks have reasons to be angry about (In my country there is a difficult situation with affordable housing for example, so the freshly married are often still living with their parents).
Anyway, that's my mini-rant, hope I answered your question.
When you ask one of the absent voters as to why they don't vote, they will say something like "none of the parties really represent me", "it's all rigged anyway", "politicians here are all the same" blah blah blah. Some of that will ring true, but it's kind of like a brocken clock two times a day - they are simply lucky to get it right, it doesn't come from any substantial analysis of the factors at play. It's something wholly different from, say, an Anarchist who has decided to opt-out of the system for well thought-out ideological reasons.They don't even want to take the damn time to learn about what exactly different parties are proposing in terms of tax policies and such (apparently numbers are boring to them), so no wonder they later feel like none represent their interests, because they themselves express no discerneble views that could be represented. I am both angry and bewildered as almost every time there is an election, there will be one or two candidates without any record under their belts who get elected into the parliament, simply because his or her last name is the same as some other, non-related, already famous politician (I'm totally serious about this), it's like people go inside the voting booth and have no idea what they're doing.
So it's all a massive Catch - 22, I'd say. Ignorant electorate breeds lousy politicians, there's no way around that.
Even the ones that actually are active and want to change something are thin on the ground. This Saturday there were protests in Warsaw modeled after the 99% thing, and according to the police 150 people showed up, even though there are things that a lot more folks have reasons to be angry about (In my country there is a difficult situation with affordable housing for example, so the freshly married are often still living with their parents).
Anyway, that's my mini-rant, hope I answered your question.
Edited by chris w, 17 October 2011 - 10:01 AM.
#3
Posted 07 November 2011 - 01:43 AM
In my opinion, most of those not inclined to vote will probably serve their countries best by continuing not to vote. And since I used to work on voter registration, I can attest to the quality of newly registered voters.
sponsored ad
#4
Posted 11 December 2011 - 09:35 PM
In my opinion, most of those not inclined to vote will probably serve their countries best by continuing not to vote. And since I used to work on voter registration, I can attest to the quality of newly registered voters.
You are correct. The real problem like Chris W explained above us is that people are uneducated about the political system in general.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users














