• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In    
  • Create Account
  LongeCity
              Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans

Photo
- - - - -

Are specialist doctors usually easier to get along with?

doctors

  • Please log in to reply
1 reply to this topic

#1 InquilineKea

  • Guest
  • 788 posts
  • 89
  • Location:Redmond,WA (aka Simfish)

Posted 11 May 2012 - 02:36 AM


I actually look forward to meetings with dentists, dermatologists, and optometrists. They study systems that are fundamentally simpler to that of the whole body, so they don't have the arrogant close-mindedness that a lot of more generalist doctors (like primary care practitioners and psychiatrists) do. It's easy to know that what's best for a single body system corresponds with what's best for healthspan extension, so I rarely disagree with what they say. Maybe there's also less disagreement among practitioners in those fields too (as opposed to fields like psychiatry, which is kind of a mess in many ways) [1].

Plus, most people neglect what's best for their gums/eyes/skin anyways. So they respect people who are really into long-term care of their gums/eyes/skin.

That said, there are (of course) good primary care practitioners and good psychiatrists - it's just that there are a lot of bad ones too. They're the ones who flinch at blood tests or at taking risks with certain prescriptions. Out of all of the fights I've had, I've primarily had them with primary care practitioners and psychiatrists (though I had a fight with an acupuncturist my parents forced me to see, and I also had an uncomfortable discussion with a urologist). I'm seeing a physical therapist right now too - I think it's going well so far - but we'll see about what happens over the long-term.

Has anyone else had the same experience?

[1] Maybe disagreement is a huge thing, since when you *are* in fields with huge amounts of disagreement, the doctor might be biased towards a less effective method, and might force you on it first. This is also true with education, where there are HUGE disagreements over what's most effective, and where the teachers almost never go with what's most effective.

Maybe there are also fewer perverse incentives in dental care/eye care too, though, since it's easier to tell whether or not a treatment is working or not in those fields (whereas in many other things, people often tell you that it's "silently building up" when in many times it isn't).

==

On the other hand though, I don't totally know... I don't want to get x-rays at the frequency they want me to get, and I certainly never got into the situation where they felt like they had to give me a dental amalgam. Those are things where "enhancing" oral health could come at the detriment of long-term health of other parts of the system.

Edited by InquilineKea, 11 May 2012 - 03:00 AM.


#2 Danail Bulgaria

  • Guest
  • 2,220 posts
  • 421
  • Location:Bulgaria

Posted 11 May 2012 - 05:11 AM

InquilineKea, I have heared, that in some countries, USA in this count, the dentists are get paied from the health ensurance only if they represent an x-ray of the patient before and after the treatment, so they make x-rays of their patients like hell. They do x-rays every time, when they have to, and every time, when they do not have to. So, if You live in a country like that, I am completely agree with You, that the x-rays are too much. For the dental amalgam, my oppinion is, that there is not what You to afraid of.





Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: doctors

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users