http://www.theregist...tion_long_life/
It doesn't distinguish between child-onset castrates, adolescent onset castrates or adult onset castrates. At what age would the benefits of castration be negligible?
Posted 07 April 2013 - 05:19 AM
Posted 08 April 2013 - 12:23 AM
Posted 08 April 2013 - 11:50 AM
Posted 09 April 2013 - 06:42 AM
Posted 09 April 2013 - 01:59 PM
Posted 09 April 2013 - 04:54 PM
Posted 09 April 2013 - 05:19 PM
You don't need to cut anything off - they have drugs these days, which is probably a more effective approach anyways given that the adrenal glands also produce testosterone.
Posted 09 April 2013 - 09:50 PM
If the reason for that life elongation is the absence of the testosterone hormone, then if someone wants to use that for life elongation, he has to castrate himself whlie a child, before reaching the puberty. This corresponds also with the theory, that slowing down the sexual maturacy can elongate life. Castrating after the age of 60 - 70 will not work, because of the small amounths of hormones produced anyway.
Here are some citations:
"eunuchs lived to an average age of 70"
What is the point for castrating Yourself and never having children, in order NOT to reach 90 ?
Posted 12 April 2013 - 05:41 AM
Posted 12 April 2013 - 02:14 PM
You should try it and report any benefits! But seriously, what's the point of living if you can't bust any nuts? Correct me if I'm wrong.
Posted 12 April 2013 - 02:23 PM
If the reason for that life elongation is the absence of the testosterone hormone, then if someone wants to use that for life elongation, he has to castrate himself whlie a child, before reaching the puberty. This corresponds also with the theory, that slowing down the sexual maturacy can elongate life. Castrating after the age of 60 - 70 will not work, because of the small amounths of hormones produced anyway.
Here are some citations:
"eunuchs lived to an average age of 70"
What is the point for castrating Yourself and never having children, in order NOT to reach 90 ?
They lived to an average age of 70 back in the 13 century. Isn't that impressive? So you're saying that after puberty testosterone has already done "it's damage" so to speak and a lack of testosterone after puberty wouldn't positively effect lifespan?
Edited by cryonicsculture, 12 April 2013 - 02:24 PM.
Posted 24 April 2013 - 10:37 AM
Posted 05 July 2013 - 08:20 PM
Posted 26 July 2013 - 01:10 AM
Edited by InquilineKea, 26 July 2013 - 01:10 AM.
Posted 26 July 2013 - 06:48 AM
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users