• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In    
  • Create Account
  LongeCity
              Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans

Photo
- - - - -

FYI: new abstract resveratrol + excercise

resveratrol

  • Please log in to reply
8 replies to this topic

#1 geo12the

  • Guest
  • 762 posts
  • -211

Posted 08 December 2015 - 06:40 PM


Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2015 Sep 11:1-7. [Epub ahead of print]

Influence of exercise training with resveratrol supplementation on skeletal muscle mitochondrial capacity.

Author information
  • 1Department of Kinesiology, 330 River Road, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
Abstract

Physical inactivity reduces, and exercise training increases, mitochondrial capacity. In rodents, exercise training effects can be augmented by large doses of resveratrol supplementation but whether this can occur in humans with a smaller dose is unclear. This study sought to determine the effects of resveratrol supplementation in combination with exercise training on skeletal muscle mitochondrial capacity. Sixteen healthy young adults were randomly assigned in a double-blind fashion to consume either placebo or 500 mg of resveratrol plus 10 mg of piperine, a bioenhancer to increase bioavailibilty and bioefficacy of resveratrol. Participants ingested the pills daily for 4 weeks and completed 3 sessions per week of submaximal endurance training of the wrist flexor muscles of the nondominant arm. The contralateral arm served as an untrained control. Skeletal muscle mitochondrial capacity was measured using near-infrared spectroscopy. Changes in mitochondrial capacity from baseline to post-testing indicated significant differences between the resveratrol+piperine-trained arm and the placebo-trained arm (p = 0.02), with the resveratrol+piperine group increasing about 40% from baseline (Δk = 0.58), while the placebo group increased about 10% from baseline (Δk = 0.13). Neither the placebo group nor the resveratrol+piperine group exhibited changes in mitochondrial capacity in the untrained arm. In conclusion, low-intensity exercise training can increase forearm skeletal muscle mitochondrial capacity when combined with resveratrol and piperine supplementation.

 


  • Informative x 4
  • Good Point x 2
  • like x 1

#2 malbecman

  • Guest
  • 733 posts
  • 156
  • Location:Sunny CA

Posted 08 December 2015 - 11:34 PM

 Interesting find, thanks.



Click HERE to rent this advertising spot to support LongeCity (this will replace the google ad above).

#3 maxwatt

  • Guest, Moderator LeadNavigator
  • 4,949 posts
  • 1,625
  • Location:New York

Posted 09 December 2015 - 01:33 AM

More confirmation of the effects on exercise.  Resveratrol is well known to be a strong PPAR-gamma agonist.  An effect is to increase insulin sensitivity and increase mitochondrial density, as well as turning white fat (energy storage) into brown fat (energy generating).  Some years ago a licensed cycling coach descried the positive effects of resveratrol on two of his charges and on himself, it this forum.

 

Though often discounted as a failed life-extension treatment, resveratrol is anything but inert, and has a number of positive effects. 


  • Good Point x 1

#4 NeuroGeneration

  • Guest
  • 103 posts
  • 11
  • Location:NYC
  • NO

Posted 09 December 2015 - 08:28 PM

Can somebody comment on the posted study in relation to this one? 

 

Resveratrol blunts the positive effects of exercise training on cardiovascular health in aged men. Abstract  

Ageing is thought to be associated with decreased vascular function partly due to oxidative stress. Resveratrol is a polyphenol, which in animal studies has been shown to decrease atherosclerosis, and improve cardiovascular health and physical capacity, in part through its effects on Sirtuin 1 signalling and through an improved antioxidant capacity. We tested the hypothesis that resveratrol supplementation enhances training-induced improvements in cardiovascular health parameters in aged men. Twenty-seven healthy physically inactive aged men (age: 65 ± 1 years; body mass index: 25.4 ± 0.7 kg m(-2); mean arterial pressure (MAP): 95.8 ± 2.2 mmHg; maximal oxygen uptake: 2488 ± 72 ml O2 min(-1)) were randomized into 8 weeks of either daily intake of either 250 mg trans-resveratrol (n = 14) or of placebo (n = 13) concomitant with high-intensity exercise training. Exercise training led to a 45% greater (P < 0.05) increase in maximal oxygen uptake in the placebo group than in the resveratrol group and to a decrease in MAP in the placebo group only (-4.8 ± 1.7 mmHg; P < 0.05). The interstitial level of vasodilator prostacyclin was lower in the resveratrol than in the placebo group after training (980 ± 90 vs. 1174 ± 121 pg ml(-1); P < 0.02) and muscle thromboxane synthase was higher in the resveratrol group after training (P < 0.05). Resveratrol administration also abolished the positive effects of exercise on low-density lipoprotein, total cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein ratio and triglyceride concentrations in blood (P < 0.05). Resveratrol did not alter the effect of exercise training on the atherosclerosis marker vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1). Sirtuin 1 protein levels were not affected by resveratrol supplementation. These findings indicate that, whereas exercise training effectively improves several cardiovascular health parameters in aged men, concomitant resveratrol supplementation can blunt these effects.



→ source (external link)

 

Obviously one study is focused on cardiovascular fitness and the other on muscle mitochondrial capacity. However, the thought behind the blunting of cardiovascular benefits was that it was due to an antioxidant style reduction of the hormetic effects of exercise. If that were the case, though, I would suspect that the resveratrol treated muscles would *not* have greater mitochondrial capacity than those that were not treated.

 

Could it have something to do with the intensity of the exercise (the muscle study being more intense and customized to the individual, the cardio one being standardized training)? Is there an alternative explanation for resveratrol negatively impacting the cardiovascular system's hormetic response, but not the mitochondrial response? Something else?

 

Any commentary is appreciated!



#5 maxwatt

  • Guest, Moderator LeadNavigator
  • 4,949 posts
  • 1,625
  • Location:New York

Posted 09 December 2015 - 11:43 PM

Recent data do not provide evidence that resveratrol causes ‘mainly negative’ or ‘adverse’ effects on exercise training in humans

"...The authors concluded ‘exercise training effectively improves several cardiovascular health parameters in aged men, [but] resveratrol supplementation blunts most of these effects’. The slightly blunted response to exercise in a few dependent variables is embellished in the running head, entitled ‘adverse effects of resveratrol on cardiovascular health’. Such powerful wording suggests resveratrol actually counteracts the benefits of exercise training and is harmful, yet the results presented do not support such strong statements.The results presented reveal that, of ∼45 variables examined, exercise training improved 12 variables and did not influence 18 variables, independent of treatment group. Clearly, resveratrol does not blunt ‘most’ of the effects of exercise or produce ‘mainly negative’ effects, as the majority of comparisons revealed similar effects for resveratrol and placebo....."  They go on to criticize the statistical methods use, questioning the significance of the differences. 

 

Often a study will be presented to draw a conclusion the (lead) researcher wants to prove, a bee in his bonnet or a contrarian view that will gain his lab some attention.  This may have been the case here, though the author demurs in a reply to the reply.

 

Also note, dosage:  some have here reported their own experience, finding a dose of 400 mg a day for three months resulted in improved exercise tolerance in trained individuals. This study used 250 mg for a few weeks.

 

If one wants an exercise mimetic, PPAR-delta agonists are more effective than resveratrol for that purpose.

 


  • Informative x 3

#6 NeuroGeneration

  • Guest
  • 103 posts
  • 11
  • Location:NYC
  • NO

Posted 10 December 2015 - 01:03 AM

Thanks, maxwatt – this helps a lot. I'll incorporate 250mg of resveratrol + 25mg pterostilbene, on top of my one daily BASIS pill (125mg nicotinamide riboside, 25mg pterosilbene). I'm 30, so I don't suspect I'd need a larger dose at this point.



#7 bixbyte

  • Guest
  • 559 posts
  • 45
  • Location:End of the Galaxy
  • NO

Posted 10 December 2015 - 01:45 AM

Can somebody comment on the posted study in relation to this one? 

 

Resveratrol blunts the positive effects of exercise training on cardiovascular health in aged men. Abstract  

Ageing is thought to be associated with decreased vascular function partly due to oxidative stress. Resveratrol is a polyphenol, which in animal studies has been shown to decrease atherosclerosis, and improve cardiovascular health and physical capacity, in part through its effects on Sirtuin 1 signalling and through an improved antioxidant capacity. We tested the hypothesis that resveratrol supplementation enhances training-induced improvements in cardiovascular health parameters in aged men. Twenty-seven healthy physically inactive aged men (age: 65 ± 1 years; body mass index: 25.4 ± 0.7 kg m(-2); mean arterial pressure (MAP): 95.8 ± 2.2 mmHg; maximal oxygen uptake: 2488 ± 72 ml O2 min(-1)) were randomized into 8 weeks of either daily intake of either 250 mg trans-resveratrol (n = 14) or of placebo (n = 13) concomitant with high-intensity exercise training. Exercise training led to a 45% greater (P < 0.05) increase in maximal oxygen uptake in the placebo group than in the resveratrol group and to a decrease in MAP in the placebo group only (-4.8 ± 1.7 mmHg; P < 0.05). The interstitial level of vasodilator prostacyclin was lower in the resveratrol than in the placebo group after training (980 ± 90 vs. 1174 ± 121 pg ml(-1); P < 0.02) and muscle thromboxane synthase was higher in the resveratrol group after training (P < 0.05). Resveratrol administration also abolished the positive effects of exercise on low-density lipoprotein, total cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein ratio and triglyceride concentrations in blood (P < 0.05). Resveratrol did not alter the effect of exercise training on the atherosclerosis marker vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1). Sirtuin 1 protein levels were not affected by resveratrol supplementation. These findings indicate that, whereas exercise training effectively improves several cardiovascular health parameters in aged men, concomitant resveratrol supplementation can blunt these effects.



→ source (external link)

 

Obviously one study is focused on cardiovascular fitness and the other on muscle mitochondrial capacity. However, the thought behind the blunting of cardiovascular benefits was that it was due to an antioxidant style reduction of the hormetic effects of exercise. If that were the case, though, I would suspect that the resveratrol treated muscles would *not* have greater mitochondrial capacity than those that were not treated.

 

Could it have something to do with the intensity of the exercise (the muscle study being more intense and customized to the individual, the cardio one being standardized training)? Is there an alternative explanation for resveratrol negatively impacting the cardiovascular system's hormetic response, but not the mitochondrial response? Something else?

 

Any commentary is appreciated!

 

 

The two groups do not appear to be equal in my opinion.

Sounds like the Resveratrol group either have asthma or were deprived of oxygen.

See Chart four:

http://www.ncbi.nlm....8/figure/fig04/

 

I run over 4 miles a day in an hour and supplement with 1,000 mg of 98% Resveratrol / day

and I am not gasping for air.

So, this study sounds like horse apples to me.



#8 geo12the

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 762 posts
  • -211

Posted 15 January 2016 - 09:20 PM

Not sure how this new study relates to the above ones. Thoughts?:

 

http://www.nutraingr...ndrial-capacity

http://www.nrcresear...d&#.VplM0vkrLcs



Click HERE to rent this advertising spot to support LongeCity (this will replace the google ad above).

#9 niner

  • Guest
  • 16,276 posts
  • 2,000
  • Location:Philadelphia

Posted 16 January 2016 - 01:43 AM

The difference in the two studies might be the age of the participants, which likely differed by about 40 years.  ("young adults" vs 65 +/- 1)  If that's it, it wouldn't be the first time I've seen such a thing.







Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: resveratrol

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users