Please link a study of this kind if you know!
Probably nobody wants to google for studies of so many different kind of nutrients - of which is kind of common knowledge that either taking them with food or without food enhances their absorption. For example some minerals, like magnesium, or individual amino acids, are better taken without food to avoid competition with calcium and other proteins in foods. Fat soluble vitamins, like A, D, K, CoQ10 or tocotrienols are better taken with the largest fat-containing meal of the day. Again other minerals are better taken with meals for avoiding stomach upset.
But to your examples: Niacin is sufficiently absorbed in high enough doses, you can even directly feel it through the niacin flush, which the bid from chicken breast breast would add only insignificant amounts. At least if you take niacin for its pharmacological effects. Nevertheless, you still better take niacin with meals to dampen the flush a bit.
Nothing compares to oral vitamin C absorption than mega-doses of ascorbic acid powder in water on a empty stomach. On the contrary, the sugars in Oranges would even compete with vitamin C absorption.
Then liver has many times more vitamin A than many supplements, you wouldn't indulge every day.