Can anyone compare generic modafinil (e.g. from Drugs-one.com) to that of brand-name Modiodal? I realize that no difference should exist, although quality may influence efficacy.
L
onge
C
ity
Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans
Posted 22 December 2004 - 01:56 AM
Posted 22 December 2004 - 02:03 AM
Can anyone compare generic modafinil (e.g. from Drugs-one.com) to that of brand-name Modiodal? I realize that no difference should exist, although quality may influence efficacy.
Posted 22 December 2004 - 05:23 AM
Posted 22 December 2004 - 01:57 PM
have you had this product analysed nootropi?
Posted 23 December 2004 - 04:30 AM
Posted 23 December 2004 - 08:21 AM
Posted 23 December 2004 - 08:58 AM
Posted 23 December 2004 - 09:32 AM
Posted 23 December 2004 - 09:13 PM
Posted 24 December 2004 - 01:59 AM
I ordered 10mg valiums a while back (from drugs-one) and they were NOT 10mg. The sheet said they were but I know what 30mg of valium feels like and when I took theirs I felt almost nothing. Anybody else? Are the xanax the same way?
Posted 24 December 2004 - 03:18 AM
Edited by zg00, 24 December 2004 - 05:14 AM.
Posted 25 December 2004 - 07:31 AM
What someone is doing taking 30 mg of valium at one time is an interesting question (do people really take that much for recreational uses? We use 5-10 mg to sedate people). In any case, while one person's opinion should not be taken as gospel, still one has to wonder abotu the quality of their stuff.
Posted 25 December 2004 - 07:26 PM
Posted 29 December 2004 - 12:19 PM
Posted 30 December 2004 - 06:51 PM
I think this is going a little OT. Valium, while it might be an excellent drug for the short term treatment of anxiety, is not a nootropic.
I believe scottl was simply using it to add some meat to my observation regarding the various opinions floating around on the internet on the brand vs. generic argument.
www.dr-bob.org might be a much more appropriate site to ask your question, but even there they frown on discussions surrounding drug abuse (although happily, not recovery). So I'd at least reccomend rewording it.
Posted 30 December 2004 - 08:10 PM
Posted 30 December 2004 - 08:59 PM
Posted 30 December 2004 - 11:47 PM
... snip ...have you had this product analysed nootropi?
When the CEO of these respective corporations is deciding the best way to maximize profits, he would (unless he has the intelligence of an ape) see a much higher cost in not implementing cost effective quality control standards, as there is a high likelyhood that one of their competitors or customers could prove that their products were unsafe; and such a proof would undeniably discredit their business.
... snip...
Posted 31 December 2004 - 06:54 AM
Lets no split hairs here. If the drug was designed to be used recreationally, then using in such a way would not construe abuse. Personally I don't care one way or the other, so don't take what I'm saying to heart.
Dr. Bob's site isn't exactly anti or pro med, I'd consider it more of a support group. But its an excellent resource for information and discussions on psychology, pharmacology (including very useful discussions on individual reactions to different new/old/etc medications), depression, anxiety, over eating, creative writing, substance use, alternative treatments, religion or politics and just about anything else you can think of. Its an adult board and one of the better moderated boards I've come across.
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD at University of Chicago Department of Psychiatry.
Posted 01 January 2005 - 08:26 PM
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users