You made me think a lot Armrha.
I am rejoiced to say that I seem to find you understand me pretty much a lot, our lines of thinking are somewhat alike; that's great to to have you here. I'd like to someday discuss these things with in you person.
Well, it's hard to exactly pinpoint what would happen to material travelling near a black hole. The first and most important thing is that the information that falls into a black hole, at least by information theory, is totally lost to this universe. It's light cone is destroyed. In this way, tossing something into a black hole is kind of like subtracting it from the universe; If we tossed you into the black hole, and there was no means in snatching your brain configuration as you hit the event horizon, you would be lost forever inside it (provided you didn't discover a way to travel faster then light...). While they think black holes to decay in a steady release of energy over time, the decay is information-free, pure entropy, a sine wave of hawking radiation, and it doesn't escape from inside the event horizon, just right on the edge.
Hmm when uploading will be possible, it will be possible to totally destroy information then. Lose secretes which never meant to be exposed to what seems as forever. Will we reach it by living that long?
Oh, our humanistic mind, so sophisticated and such thinkers we are here, but so limited... No place to store infinity... So weak.
The concept of a white hole, or the opposite of a black hole, is only mathematically possibly with a zero-mass black hole, which we don't currently think can exist. Otherwise, the event horizon will stop any matter from escaping: Say you are on a vector for the exit of the black hole, once you passed through the event horizon you might come close to where that 'white hole' would be, but the event horizon from the massive black hole would keep you from ever actually escaping. Otherwise, all black holes would constantly be ejecting their matter and things like time travel would be very simple affairs. I don't know why the ejected white hole would be in another dimension.
The white thing won't be termed as a hole since it won't swallow but spit.
Now, it will be in another dimension just for making it easier for us... I mean-
Anyways, if there were common naturally occuring white holes I'd think we'd see them by now... they'd be a lot brighter then black holes.
That's why we wouldn't see it... We are IN IT. We are the things that the 'white projection' has thrashed out...
I suppose you've already thought, 'But what if we discover matter with negative mass/inertia?'. Well, that poses another problem too.
Yes I did, and damn, so many unknown things heh.
Hmm so if the white projection has somewhat base of truth, then the only way to make something totally disappear is to somehow merge the two when the contrasting power is larger- fitting perfectly to have a surplus which matching oppositely the element whom meant to destruction.
In such case the overload from both side will be too big and won't transfigure to one opposite information. The problem is to count perfectly the mass and form. We'll need an extremely sensitive scanners- without limitations at all. Which will be not possible practically vanish something, but just encrypt, hide, change. Although theoretically it is possible.
Yours truthfully
~Infernity