Quality of current cryonics questionable, due to shrinkage, other molecular issues, right?
Revival from true death (not hibernation) does not exist in nature, therefore Bayes' Theorem
tells us science discovering how to revive dead has low chances...?
But what about this?:
Science advances to point where we optionally go for brain scans that DO capture
all connectomes, molecular info, etc., but has not yet advanced to "computer revival"
of our scans -- it will come decades or century later...?
Say we have annual WBE scan on our birthday Jan 2 every year, starting age 30.
Say we are age 81.5 & unexpectedly die on a Jun 2.
Our last half year is lost when at some point in future our last WBE scan
is loaded to computer & we become revived at 81.
Perhaps future science uses our pre-81 annual scans to
"maximize" our revived sense of continuous self...?
THE POINT: CRYONICS IS NOT NEEDED...
Comments on this scenario appreciated.
Especially, about how close we are to accurate WBE scan for future revival...?