• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In    
  • Create Account
  LongeCity
              Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans

Photo
- - - - -

Keeping up Appearances


  • Please log in to reply
17 replies to this topic

#1 kevin

  • Member, Guardian
  • 2,779 posts
  • 822

Posted 21 March 2003 - 01:32 AM


Our appearance mirrors the internal changes that go along with aging and let's face it, nobody wants to look old. Although the reality of death is so ingrained in our society it is difficult to convince anyone to fund serious research into life-extension, there are billions of dollars spent on largely ineffective products, trying to keep up a youthful appearance.

A more pro-active approach to fighting aging and involving the public at large will come not when they know that a pill can mimic starvation and give longer life, but when they will be able to see concrete results on the surface... their appearance. The lengths people will go to in fighting an aging appearance can be pretty drastic, and I think the aging boomers will scramble for methods of keeping young that are proven to work.

From skin, to hair, to teeth, muscle degeneration etc.. it all falls apart and it makes us look 'old'... I'd like to have a thread that is designated to those advances in biotech that are helpful in keeping us together on the outside.

------
Men routinely pay thousands of dollars to get hair moved around on their head. Granted, it's pretty extreme, but it is just another example of what people will do to look younger.

Would being able to stop balding make the average Joe (especially the balding one) think that life-extension was possible?... maybe even immortality? Absolutely...

Here's a press release that the follicularly challenged may be interested in.

March 20, 2003— The delicate interplay of two chemical signals coaxes stem cells into becoming hair follicles, according to new research by scientists at the Howard Hughes Medical Institute at The Rockefeller University.

The research has implications for understanding hair growth and hair-follicle development, and it may also help explain how diverse structures, such as teeth and lungs, are formed or how some forms of skin cancer develop.

In an article published in the March 20, 2003, issue of the journal Nature, researchers led by HHMI investigator Elaine Fuchs at The Rockefeller University discovered that two signaling molecules, Wnt and noggin, influence immature stem cells to begin the process of forming hair follicles.

According to Fuchs, studies in her laboratory and others revealed the possible involvement of Wnt and other proteins in the signal transduction pathways that trigger hair-follicle formation. In previous studies, Fuchs and her colleagues produced an abnormally furry mouse with high numbers of hair follicles by genetically altering the animals to produce a stabilized form of a protein called beta-catenin. They also knew that beta-catenin was affected by the Wnt protein. Among the other proteins they implicated in hair-follicle formation was “lymphoid enhancer-binding factor 1” (Lef1), which is part of a transcription complex that controls gene activity.

“One of the aspects that scientists have been trying to understand in development of hair follicles, tooth buds, mammary glands and lungs is how these various transduction pathways work together,” said Fuchs.

The researchers also had evidence that a second mechanism, involving a signaling molecule called bone morphogenetic protein (BMP), is also required for creating epithelial buds — pockets in the skin that are the precursors of hair follicles.

Through experiments using mouse skin cell cultures and skin from embryonic mice with various genes knocked out, the researchers showed that Wnt stabilizes beta-catenin and increases its concentrations in the target stem cell. In concert, noggin inhibits BMP, leading to production of Lef1. In addition, beta-catenin activates Lef1, which in turn downregulates the gene for the protein E-cadherin. E-cadherin is important in cell adhesion. Reduced levels of E-cadherin trigger reduction of cell adhesion structures, called adherens junctions, a process important in initiating formation of the epithelial bud.

“Unlike the earlier experiments, in which we genetically altered the animals, in these experiments, we have altered the stem cells using external factors that the skin normally makes,” said Fuchs. “And in doing so, we have been able to elicit the initial responses that occur in the development of the hair follicles.

“The other important advance is that we now understand how Wnt and inhibition of the BMP signaling pathway work together by regulating this transcription factor complex. The discovery provides insights into how signals simultaneously operate together to activate a particular event, in this case, a transcription factor.”

The findings also hint at how different kinds of cells interact to produce epithelial buds, said Fuchs. “These signals are probably coming from different cells within the skin,” said Fuchs. “The Wnt pathway is likely coming from adjacent epithelial cells, and the noggin pathway from mesenchymal cells. But, they're working together on a single skin stem cell to produce an activated transcription factor.” Mesenchymal cells are unspecialized cells in embryonic skin from which the dermis will develop.

“How these signal transduction pathways are merging was not understood before, and we now have a much clearer picture of why they need to be there at the same place and time in the developing skin,” said Fuchs.

According to Fuchs, the findings also have implications for understanding how some forms of skin cancer arise. “Our studies suggest that too much or too little E-cadherin can be a bad thing,” she said. “Just the right amount of E-cadherin is needed to loosen the adhesion of the stem cells in the epithelium, to allow them to remodel and grow downward to form the hair follicle. What's interesting is researchers have found reduced levels of adherens junctions in squamous cell carcinomas of the skin. So, we think our findings may be relevant, because they suggest that if the E-cadherin levels are reduced too much, there can still be a downgrowth of the skin, but one that's deregulated. The early stages of hair follicle morphogenesis resemble, to some extent, what happens in the development of a tumor mass.”

The studies in Fuchs's laboratory seek to understand fundamental aspects of hair follicle formation, which could eventually suggest new ways to restore or inhibit hair growth. “These studies raise the possibility that drugs to activate these natural factors could promote hair follicle growth in wanted places, and inhibitory drugs could prevent hair growth in unwanted places,” she said.

Among the next steps in the research, said Fuchs, is to understand how the newly discovered machinery involved in epithelial bud formation links to the later steps that causes mature hair-producing follicles to sprout.

Edited by kperrott, 21 March 2003 - 04:12 AM.


#2 advancedatheist

  • Guest
  • 1,419 posts
  • 11
  • Location:Mayer, Arizona

Posted 21 March 2003 - 02:11 AM

I have trouble relating to the concerns of people who are obsessed with "looking youthful." I wasn't good-looking when I was 18, so the cosmetic aspects of aging make little practical difference to me.

I think we also need to consider the role of evolutionary psychology in wanting to look "young." Our genes program our behavior to broadcast our reproductive fitness to potential mates. If you want to bypass that programming so that you can work on staying alive and healthy past your "natural" life expectancy, then you need consciously to de-emphasize reproduction-driven behavior, including the desire to impress your desired choice of sex partners through your appearance. The money you'd be spending on cosmetic enhancements could be put to better uses, like investing in companies pursuing various kinds of radical life-extension technologies.

To book this BIOSCIENCE ad spot and support Longecity (this will replace the google ad above) - click HERE.

#3 kevin

  • Topic Starter
  • Member, Guardian
  • 2,779 posts
  • 822

Posted 21 March 2003 - 03:19 AM

I understand your reservations to focussing on vanity as a means to an end. I personally believe a person's attractiveness lies in their physical health and energy... both of which are affected by aging. I don't disagree that an obsession with appearance is a waste of time, energy and money but barring the coming of the Singularity I doubt if retraining our species to different behavior is possible. It is after all, in our genes.

In addition our mating behavior is shown to be guided by more esoteric factors than mere looks. Studies have shown that although evolution places a geometric ideal for male and female somewhere in our genes that we may prefer for a sex romp, we are actually truly attracted to something quite different than that ideal for a life partner. Our histocompatibility is even shown to be a key player in our selection of a mate so from a reproductive point of view looks are secondary.

The money you'd be spending on cosmetic enhancements could be put to better uses, like investing in companies pursuing various kinds of radical life-extension technologies.


Exactly...!

I want life-extension front and center in society... and soon. The wallets of the consumer will dictate how fast anti-aging therapies are accepted, supplements are a big part of it but more than that, I think it would be wise to realize that the desire to "look good", not necessarily youthful, will play a HUGE role in getting us there.

Edited by kperrott, 21 March 2003 - 04:02 AM.


#4 Limitless

  • Guest
  • 105 posts
  • 1

Posted 21 March 2003 - 03:21 AM

I have trouble relating to the concerns of people who are obsessed with "looking youthful." I wasn't good-looking when I was 18, so the cosmetic aspects of aging make little practical difference to me.


I understand this position. I am 18 in under a month, and consider myself to be pretty attractive, so it's a pretty individual thing. That being said, I'd like to differentiate a bit between looking "Youthful", and looking "Good." People peak at different times. I, myself, got the majority of my looks from my mother's family. (although I'm a male.) The members of my mother's family tend to look "Better", you could say, but peak earlier -and some start to lose their hair -almost as much as my father's family. My father's family also experiences baldness, (more, actually) but usually has more of that "Distinguished look" in middle age -rather than "Pretty boy, or cute looks."

-This sort of variation is so common, that I don't believe everyone wants to look as they did when they were 18. I know many girls whose looks peaked around age 12 or 13!!!! They were the so-called oversexed, "Early-developers" -you could call them. I know other women who looked "Painfully average" until their 30s, and them became very beautiful.....and you know many woman like that mature "Pierce Brosnan" look in a man, so.....you know.


I think we also need to consider the role of evolutionary psychology in wanting to look "young." Our genes program our behavior to broadcast our reproductive fitness to potential mates.


Absolutely [!] However, I believe for some people it's simply aesthetic. (Such as owning an attractive house or car.) For these people, they want to be admired, -but not necessarily slept with.....and to be quite honest: sex, aesthetics, and/or a combination of the two really sells these days.....My main point being: Even if most people eventually give up sex, they may still care about looking good -for whatever reason.


If you want to bypass that programming so that you can work on staying alive and healthy past your "natural" life expectancy, then you need consciously to de-emphasize reproduction-driven behavior, including the desire to impress your desired choice of sex partners through your appearance.


I think this is a little misguided. Aren't healthy people usually more attractive as well [?] .....To be quite honest, I think everyone wants to look good. "Looking Young" often means "Feeling young", and that can be a great desire as the joints start to age.......and also, like I said earlier: wanting to look attractive is not just about wanting to have sex......To be quite honest, I think most people are just jealous of the most attractive people. (although this is subjective) It's that same-old attitude: "If I look good, -I care. If I don't -I don't care." Sounds pretty funny when its put that way, doesn't it [?]



The money you'd be spending on cosmetic enhancements could be put to better uses, like investing in companies pursuing various kinds of radical life-extension technologies.



Yes it could, but couldn't extreme life-extension technologies also make people look young and/or attractive (at least look their best) indefinitely [?] Everyone can get what they want from this solution, I think......Why can't we "Kill two birds with one stone" [?]

And finally: I don't think everyone will have to give up sex and/or having children to become immortal......no more than they would have to leave their bodies -regardless of practicality. Fertility and sexual attractiveness should be easily-extended indefinitely, if aging is reversible......skin and its complexion & elasticity are just another part of the aging puzzle.


Bye for now! :)

#5 kevin

  • Topic Starter
  • Member, Guardian
  • 2,779 posts
  • 822

Posted 21 March 2003 - 04:11 AM

Limitless,

Thanks for your 'youthful' perspective.

Life-extension will surely not only extend life but will also reverse aging otherwise it would certainly be difficult to convince people to invest anything in its' pursuit.

Kevin

#6 Limitless

  • Guest
  • 105 posts
  • 1

Posted 21 March 2003 - 04:50 AM

Limitless,

Thanks for your 'youthful' perspective.    


No problem! [roll] lol :) [B)]


Life-extension will surely not only extend life but will also reverse aging otherwise it would certainly be difficult to convince people to invest anything in its' pursuit.  

Kevin



That's true....It would be hard to convince people to pursue it otherwise.....they're pursuing it for a somewhat less-important reason right now, mostly.....I guess we'll just have to hope that the current scientific outlook(s) prevail, and things go our way. Our position seems to be how the majority of knowledgeable life-extensionists are leaning.......

-I'm not sure why advancedaetheist insisted on separating the concepts of "Extreme life-extension", and reversing the "Physical signs of aging." ......Because aging has a biological-basis, the two concepts would appear to fit together -with the same solution.

I liked your comments earlier on the topic of "Proactivity." I've been bothering people on here about the same thing......hopefully we'll discuss that some time in the future, when we get a chance......I'm impatient, just like you.....although, at age 17, I really have a lot less of a justification to be impatient, compared to the older members on these forums.


Bye for now, kperrott [!] :)

Click HERE to rent this BIOSCIENCE adspot to support LongeCity (this will replace the google ad above).

#7 kevin

  • Topic Starter
  • Member, Guardian
  • 2,779 posts
  • 822

Posted 21 March 2003 - 09:08 PM

Rejuvenation with Carnosine

An example of real world overlap of life-extension research and the cosmetics industry...

The supplement carnosine has noted anti-aging properties in delaying cellular senescence though other properties than acting as an anti-oxidant. The abstract below is from a study in April 2002.

http://www.ncbi.nlm....3&dopt=Abstract

More recently carnosine has been tested for other beneficial properties in the treatment of autism and related problems.

http://www.designing...aor.ca/news.asp

Carnosines anti-aging properties in humans began in Oct 1997 when a press release was issued by CSIRO, in Austrailia, which indicated it had found a novel skin rejuvenating compound which it began to include in hand and face cream whose sales have begun to climb extraordinarily due to it's effectiveness in reducing the signs of aging in skin.

http://www.eurekaler...CDFC-300797.php

Edited by kperrott, 21 March 2003 - 09:16 PM.


#8 kevin

  • Topic Starter
  • Member, Guardian
  • 2,779 posts
  • 822

Posted 23 March 2003 - 05:13 AM

Here's another example of someone trying to patent a substance for a skin-rejuvenating product whose anti-aging effects go far beyond wrinkles.

Methods utilizing compositions containing sacred lotus (methyltransferase) to treat aging skin

the enzyme that they have isolated from 'sacred lotus seeds' is 'L-isoaspartyl methyltransferase' an important enzyme in repairing isomerized aspartyl residues that can accumulate in all organisms, even higher plants.

Isomerized aspartyl residues have been implicated in more than a few disease conditions as well, including Alzheimers and epilepsy:

Isoaspartate formation and neurodegeneration in Alzheimer's disease.

Down-regulation of protein L-isoaspartyl methyltransferase in human epileptic hippocampus contributes to generation of damaged tubulin

#9 kevin

  • Topic Starter
  • Member, Guardian
  • 2,779 posts
  • 822

Posted 23 March 2003 - 05:37 AM

Like Carnosine, this is another example of an anti-senescent product used in preventing aging of the skin.

Furfuryladenine (Kinetin and Kinerase) for Skin Rejuvenation

Originating from a 'plant' this one made it into production relatively quickly from it's discovery and is widely available.

Kinetin delays the onset of ageing characteristics in human fibroblasts.

The main component of Kinerase, Furfuryladenine, is one of the primary oxidation products of DNA.

Furfural, a precursor of the cytokinin hormone kinetin, and base propenals are formed by hydroxyl radical damage of DNA.

Now if people would only get as excited about damaged DNA as they do about wrinkles... lol

#10 kevin

  • Topic Starter
  • Member, Guardian
  • 2,779 posts
  • 822

Posted 16 April 2003 - 01:22 AM

An example of how the cosmetic industry is driving the anti-aging market is given by a Betterhumans.com article entitled

Billion-dollar Anti-aging Market Growing Rapidly

details how Baby Boomers who largely just want to look good are spending HUGE sums of cash to stay young.

Links for would-be entrepreneurs who want to capitalize on the trend are also given.

#11 kevin

  • Topic Starter
  • Member, Guardian
  • 2,779 posts
  • 822

Posted 17 July 2003 - 12:11 AM

Here's a totally cutting edge 'cosmeceutical' that is putting some pretty potent ingredients together in a skin care product... Again we see cosmetics leading the way in anti-aging research.. Anything to get rid of those ladies' wrinkles..

TNS Recovery Complex™ (TNS stands for Tissue Nutrient Solution) was developed by Advanced Tissue Sciences, Inc. This company developed the technology to grow human skin for grafting in the laboratory. Certain properties (proteins) were found in this research that enable the body's skin to regenerate and repair iteslf. They are called Human Growth Factors (not hormones.) The active patented complex contains:

Transforming Growth Factor-beta (TGF-beta). Responsible for collagen secretion. Increased collagen fills in the depression or wrinkle and restores the support structure of the skin.
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) and Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF). Responsible for new blood vessel formation. New blood vessels deliver nutrients to the tissue that improve growth conditions for fibroblasts, keratinocytes and collagen secretion.
Keratinocyte Growth Factor (KGF). Responsible for epithelial cell growth resulting in the renewal of the epidermal layer of the skin.
Interleukins (IL3 and IL6). Responsible for reduced inflammation, which leads to more rapid healing.

Ingredients: Human Fibroblast Conditioned Media, Ethoxydiglycol, Isoceteth-20, Triethanolamine, Carbomer, Phenoxyethanol, Methylparaben, Propluparaben, Butylparaben, Ethylparaben, Isobutylparaben, Fragrance.


Wound healing factors being used in skin therapy.. !

http://store.yahoo.c...source=overture

#12 kevin

  • Topic Starter
  • Member, Guardian
  • 2,779 posts
  • 822

Posted 21 July 2003 - 03:23 AM

It doesnt' come as a big surprise that the substance ependymin being tested by the pharmaceutical company Ceremedix, will be probably be first seen as a component in 'cremes' meant to rejuvenate skin... It's where the money is after all..

In a press release form Northeastern University we have this quote

Initial tests have already shown startling successes. A rat that suffered a stroke was given the medicine and the effects of the stroke were almost completely reversed. Geriatric mice that received the drug were permanently rejuvenated. Preliminary tests even indicate that in cream form, the drug could have a rejuvenating effect on skin, which is big news for cosmetics companies.


To be fair, it is easier to convince the FDA that a substance applied topically is safer than it would be if taken internally although it is likely that the toxicity of ependymin will be very low as it is a naturally occuring protein in the body.

LIVING TO 120 WITH EASE

I wonder if 'permanent rejuvenation' means 'immortal'..

#13 kevin

  • Topic Starter
  • Member, Guardian
  • 2,779 posts
  • 822

Posted 10 September 2003 - 03:54 AM

Link: http://abcnews.go.co...mice020910.html
Date: 09-10-03
Author: Amanda Onion
Source: ABC News
Title: Glowing Green Mice - Scientists Seek Disease, Balding Cures in Mouse Hair


Posted Image
Glowing Green Mice

Scientists Seek Disease, Balding Cures in Mouse Hair
By Amanda Onion

Sept. 10 — Scientists who created mice with glowing green hair say their work could someday help lead to treatments for baldness and graying, and perhaps a host of other, more serious diseases.

Posted Image
The hair follicle cells in mouse skin glow green as they develop in this microscopic image. These cells later sprouted glowing green hair. (AntiCancer, Inc.)

"The hair follicle is a great factory," explains Robert Hoffman, president of the San Diego-based AntiCancer, Inc. "It can be coded to produce more hair or colored hair. It could also be a good factory for more useful products like insulin."

Researchers at AntiCancer, Inc. first began tackling baldness 12 years ago for chemotherapy patients who lose hair following treatments. Since then researchers at the San Diego clinic, the University of Pennsylvania and other labs have been making gradual steps toward finding a treatment for the condition by manipulating genes in hair follicles, mostly in mice.

Not only could these hair follicles be genetically modified to sprout more robust hair, the hope is they might also be modified to carry genes that would deliver a steady dose of therapeutic cures for people with diabetes, Parkinson's, cancer and other diseases. In this way, a patient's treatment could literally be delivered through their own hair follicles.

"I think this could be done in the relatively near future," says Hoffman. "It could be possible to do it in a year or two in mice."

Making Skin Sprout Green Hair

In the latest results, released today in the journal, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Hoffman's group removed skin grafts from dead mice and introduced the glowing green gene, GFP, by injecting the skin with a virus containing the gene. The team also applied an enzyme called collagenase to the mouse skin, which made the hair follicles more receptive to the glowing green gene.

They then grafted the skin onto other mice and found these skin patches persistently sprouted hair that glowed green under blue light.

Hoffman said the technique might be applied someday to improve human hair transplants. Hair transplants are normally taken from the side of the head and grafted onto the top of the head. By genetically manipulating the hair follicles of the skin graft, they could be prompted to grow more hair.

But more importantly, the researchers think their method might be used as a screening technique to hunt down particular genes.

"The problem is balding is not a simple disease and we don't yet know about any gene involved in balding," Hoffman says. "This method we developed might be one way to search for these genes."

Until exact balding genes are found, scientists can't cure baldness, but only practice ways of manipulating hair follicles.

Smearing on Genes

Previous work by AntiCancer and by George Cotsarelis of the University of Pennsylvania has introduced genes into hair follicles by encasing them into liposomes — microscopic man-made spheres of fatty material — and then smearing the liposomes onto bare skin. Hoffman's group did this on mouse skin and Cotsarelis did this on human skin that had been grafted onto the backs of mice.

The liposomes were less efficient at delivering genes to the hair follicles, but Hoffman believes the method might someday be improved to offer a more convenient way of treating baldness than hair grafts — once balding genes are found.

More is known about hair coloring.

Researchers have genetically modified albino rats and mice so they sprout black hair. That's a key first step toward developing a genetic treatment for graying hair
, although little is still known about how to grow hair in a range of shades and colors.

"Mice come in all different kinds of colors," says Hoffman. "Once we understand what genes cause what pigments we can get more colors."

Gerard Krueger, a dermatologist at the University of Utah Health Sciences Center in Salt Lake City remains skeptical that this kind of treatment will be available in the near future, pointing out that even if methods work on mice, they might not work on humans.

The Incredible Hair Follicle

"It's very clear you can get genes down hair follicles," says Krueger. "The question is how do you do it in humans in a way that is safe. Cosmetic treatments especially have to be extremely safe to justify."

Ironically, finding treatments for the cosmetic problems of balding and graying might prove more difficult than using hair follicles to treat more serious diseases. This is because researchers will need to modify all more nearly all hair follicles on a person's head to create a full head of non-gray hair. But only a few modified hair follicles could be enough to deliver treatments for diabetes and other diseases.

"The hair follicle is an incredible tool," says Hoffman. "And it's an interesting biological subject. The deeper you dig, the more you want to learn."

#14 kevin

  • Topic Starter
  • Member, Guardian
  • 2,779 posts
  • 822

Posted 22 November 2003 - 04:03 AM

Link: http://home.business...089&newsLang=en
Date: 11-05-03
Source: Business Wire
Comment: The press release below is included here, not because I think that that these 'genetically guided' skin care products are actually going to work, but to illustrate how the cosmetic and 'anti-aging' industry is leading the 'personalization' of health care using the what will shortly be the newest catch phrase of 'genetic testing'.


GeneLink Receives Notice of Allowance of Trademark: Dermagenetics
MARGATE, N.J.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Nov. 5, 2003--GeneLink, Inc. (OTCBB:GNLK) announced that the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office has issued a Notice of Allowance of GeneLink's trademark, Dermagenetics™.

"Advances in skin care enabled by GeneLink's Dermagenetics™ Profiles are imminent," said John DePhillipo, GeneLink's CEO. "A dramatic new series of anti-aging and anti-wrinkling skin creams based on GeneLink's Dermagenetics™ Profiles, will soon be available for women and men, worldwide. A person will be able to visit a cosmetic counter and purchase customized skin cream based on GeneLink's Dermagenetics™ Profiles."

By analyzing an individual's DNA, which can be taken from the mouth with a cotton swab, it is possible to predict if he or she is prone to develop certain skin conditions, skin irritations, premature wrinkling and other risks related to oxidative damage, environmental stresses, and photo-aging.

GeneLink is the leader in the field of Dermagenetics™, the new science of utilizing gene technologies to measure a person's predicted skin deficiencies. Dermagenetics™ facilitates the creation of skin care products and regimens scientifically designed to ameliorate a variety of skin health problems.

GeneLink now offers cosmetic companies the ability to create and market a powerful new class of 'genetically guided' skin-care products; these products are ultimately more effective because they are designed to target an individual's specific needs.

GeneLink, Inc. (www.genelink.info) since 1994, developed the World's First Family Centered DNA Bank and Hereditary Genetic Information Service. With recent breakthroughs, GeneLink is a pioneer and leading provider of DNA tests created to facilitate "genetically guided" health, beauty and wellness products. The company both markets and licenses its proprietary tests to the $1.4 trillion cosmetics, nutritional supplement and healthcare industries.

This press release contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. With the exception of historical information contained herein, the matters discussed in the press release involve risk and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statement. GNLK disclaims any intention or obligation to revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise.

Contacts

GeneLink, Inc.
Maria DePhillipo, 609-823-6991
Email: genelink@aol.com
www.genelink.info

#15 kevin

  • Topic Starter
  • Member, Guardian
  • 2,779 posts
  • 822

Posted 13 April 2004 - 02:01 PM

Link: http://www.japancorp...Asp?Art_ID=7077



Gene May Control Hair Growth and Depilation: Riken Confirms BMP function in Body Hair Growth

Tokyo (JCNN) - Riken (TSE: 6462) announced on April 8 that its research group has recently confirmed the function of@bone morphogenetic protein in body hair growth.

According to their experiments on mice, BMP receptor type IA plays a certain role in both hair growth and depilation. This discovery may pave the way for the development of new hair-growth drugs or epilatory that target BMP receptor type IA.

Detailed research results will be published in the April 15 issue of UK science magazine "Development."


Visit RIKEN CORPORATION at www.riken.co.jp/e/

#16 manofsan

  • Guest
  • 1,223 posts
  • 56

Posted 13 April 2004 - 08:16 PM

And don't forget the main contribution of BMP -- penis size:
http://www.scienceda...40224104308.htm

The first goal of genetic medicine should be to save and lengthen lives, and then after that cosmetic enhancements to improve quality of life. Hey, part of being younger is about looking younger, and so looking better is just a logical extension of that, so why not?

Saving and lengthening lives means curing pathological conditions, but beyond that there are genetic variations which are favorable to quality of life and lifespan, so these should then also be considered legitimate targets.

Besides, the market for cosmetic enhancement is huge. It's an unfortunate fact that the market demand for breast implant surgery or baldness cures is greater than for curing Huntington's disease. Naturally, for genetic medicine to make the most rapid progress, it's going to have to tap as much market demand as possible.

Elective procedures are still legitimate, even if the need isn't dire. Heck, one day people may have thorough sex change procedures done by genetic modification.

#17 manofsan

  • Guest
  • 1,223 posts
  • 56

Posted 13 April 2004 - 10:58 PM

Based on the following articles, I can see a number of ways gene therapy can be used for personal cosmetic/aesthetic improvement:

http://www.newscient...p?id=ns99994688

http://www.sciam.com...9A083414B7F0000

http://www.betterhum...ID=2004-04-12-2

http://www.findartic...1/article.jhtml

http://www.newscient...p?id=ns99994660


But there are many aspects of the body's structure that are rigid and not immediately alterable via gene modification. Suppose you found a hypothetical gene associated with small noses (as opposed to big huge honkers) -- infusing yourself with that gene isn't suddenly going to make your nose shrink in size. I'm not sure that even an apoptosis approach would do that, since the skeleton is largely dead and calcified after your developmental growth years. Some cosmetic genes might be more effective if implanted earlier on in life, perhaps during infancy or childhood, before the body has established its shape.

To book this BIOSCIENCE ad spot and support Longecity (this will replace the google ad above) - click HERE.

#18 manofsan

  • Guest
  • 1,223 posts
  • 56

Posted 13 April 2004 - 11:07 PM

Oh yeah, and don't forget the "nice butt" gene:

http://www.genomenew..._buttocks.shtml




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users