• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In    
  • Create Account
  LongeCity
              Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans

Photo
- - - - -

Sweetener 'not linked to cancer'


  • Please log in to reply
9 replies to this topic

#1 doug123

  • Guest
  • 2,424 posts
  • -1
  • Location:Nowhere

Posted 07 May 2006 - 01:28 AM


News source

Click here for a Q and A on Aspartame

The artificial sweetener aspartame is not linked to cancer, according to a report just released by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA).

The European food watchdog undertook an urgent review of the additive following a study, published in 2005, which suggested aspartame was carcinogenic.

But a working party said the incidence of tumours could not be linked to the artificial sweetener.

It says there is no reason to revise the current recommended intake levels.

Multiple cancers

The review had been prompted by research undertaken by the European Ramazzini Foundation of Oncology and Environmental Sciences (ERF) in Bologna, Italy, which looked at the incidence of tumours found in rats that had been given varying levels of aspartame.

On the basis of the evidence, there is no reason to revise the previously established Accepted Daily Intake


The study monitored more than 1,800 rats, following them throughout their lives.

The results, the foundation believed, showed that aspartame had the ability to induce cancers in a number of sites in the animals' bodies.

Following the publication of the study in the European Journal of Clinical Oncology, the EFSA ordered a review of the safety of the sweetener.

An EFSA sub-group, the Scientific Panel on Food Additives, Flavourings, Processing Aids and Materials in Contact with Food (AFC), put together a working party of European food experts to analyse the foundation's study and to look at other research involving aspartame.

Although AFC said ERF's study was "very extensive", the working group disagreed with the conclusions it had come to.

Other explanations

Dr Iona Pratt, chair of AFC's working group, said: "The Ramazinni Foundation's study showed an increase of cancers of the blood - lymphoma and leukaemia - in the rats."

But, she said, the working group concluded that these tumours were not related to aspartame.

AFC said the rate of the tumours was not related to the dose of aspartame, which would have been expected if there was a link.

The working group believes that a respiratory disease, found in many of the rats that took part in the study, was the likely cause of the tumours.

The AFC also looked at the incidence of kidney tumours and changes to the kidney believed to have been caused by aspartame, but concluded this was an outcome specific to rats.

It also said the diagnoses of some of the cases of malignant schwannomas (a rare type of tumour) had not been confirmed by other scientific institutions, and that the sweetener showed no evidence of genotoxity - the ability to damage DNA.

"On the basis of the evidence," said Dr Pratt, "there is no reason to revise the previously established Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI) or to undertake any further revisions of the safety of aspartame."

The ADI is the level of additive considered to be safe if consumed every day over a lifetime without risk to health.

For aspartame, the ADI is set by the European Commission's Scientific Committee on Food (SCF) at 40 milligrams per kilogram of body weight.

An adult would have to drink about 14 cans a day of diet soft drink, or consume about 80 sachets of sweetener to reach this amount.

A spokesperson from the UK's Food Standards Agency said: "The EFSA's announcement raises similar concerns about the Ramazzini study to those expressed by the UK's independent expert group, the Committee On Carcinogenicity (COC), earlier this year.

"The COC identified a number of issues that indicated the results of the study may not be reliable. These related to concerns about the health status of the animals, some details of methodology which do not conform to currently accepted best practice and adequacy of external peer review."

But ERF stood by its study and said in a statement: "Because of the globalisation of the industrialised diet and the ever increasing use of artificial sweeteners among billions of people in both industrialised and developing countries, the European Ramazzini Foundation considers its work on sweeteners to be of the highest priority for the protection of public health.

"We have planned and are conducting additional research, not only on aspartame, but also on other widely diffused artificial sweeteners and blends used in thousands of foods, beverages and pharmaceutical products."

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.u...ech/4970406.stm

Published: 2006/05/05 12:39:27 GMT

© BBC MMVI

#2 ajnast4r

  • Guest, F@H
  • 3,925 posts
  • 147
  • Location:USA
  • NO

Posted 07 May 2006 - 03:09 AM

one day its not
next day its a 10 yr study saying it is

drink away my friend.

ill keep on NOT using aspartame.

sponsored ad

  • Advert
Click HERE to rent this advertising spot for SUPPLEMENTS (in thread) to support LongeCity (this will replace the google ad above).

#3 biknut

  • Guest
  • 1,892 posts
  • -2
  • Location:Dallas Texas

Posted 07 May 2006 - 05:26 AM

Cancer, maybe, maybe not. Who cares it still tastes like crap and makes you fat.

#4 scottl

  • Guest
  • 2,177 posts
  • 2

Posted 07 May 2006 - 06:06 AM

Adam,

There are enough other choices and enough issues that there is no need to use this.

#5 Shepard

  • Member, Director, Moderator
  • 6,360 posts
  • 932
  • Location:Auburn, AL

Posted 07 May 2006 - 06:08 AM

Um, makes you fat? There are many things to say about aspartame, but I don't think that is one of them.

#6 Brainbox

  • Member
  • 2,860 posts
  • 743
  • Location:Netherlands
  • NO

Posted 07 May 2006 - 12:30 PM

The EFSA should also perform a similar test on all the health effects of suger. That would be ground braking.. [wis]

#7 biknut

  • Guest
  • 1,892 posts
  • -2
  • Location:Dallas Texas

Posted 07 May 2006 - 01:06 PM

shepard, If you research aspartame on the internet one of the most prevalent things said about it is weight gain.

#8 Shepard

  • Member, Director, Moderator
  • 6,360 posts
  • 932
  • Location:Auburn, AL

Posted 07 May 2006 - 01:09 PM

I'm aware of all the reports of people claiming weight gain, I just don't really believe them. I've yet to see any real evidence of this fact, and am currently unaware of any physiological reason for it to occur.

#9 scud

  • Guest
  • 33 posts
  • 0

Posted 07 May 2006 - 06:18 PM

Shepard- my understanding is that the aspartate acts as a neurotransmitter. It crosses the blood brain barrier and causes the neurons in the hypothalamus to constantly fire, causing a chronic hunger state. Can anybody with some brain physiology knowledge help me out here?

sponsored ad

  • Advert
Click HERE to rent this advertising spot for SUPPLEMENTS (in thread) to support LongeCity (this will replace the google ad above).

#10 doug123

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 2,424 posts
  • -1
  • Location:Nowhere

Posted 07 May 2006 - 06:26 PM

Adam,

There are enough other choices and enough issues that there is no need to use this.


Scott: I stay away from all unnatural sweeteners -- and pretty much everything not organic -- I do have to admit I sometimes eat cheese from cows given growth hormone -- and I want to stop this. Trader Joe's (do you know this company?) is a store I swear by -- and Whole Foods too. I thought all of Whole Foods market's restaurants products are hormone free -- but I was mistaken -- I asked the chefs there to show me the cheese they use and it did not say RBST free.

Have you seen the movie The Corporation?

http://www.thecorporation.com/

I highly recommend it.

The reason I posted that here was just to present some speculative evidence. Personally I think aspartame is pretty safe. I don't mess with it though -- except when I go see movies at the local independent theater -- where I order a 50% cherry coke and 50% diet coke concoction. I do not drink soft drinks outside of the theater at all.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users